Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:13:54 AM |
|
I warned you yesterday about ban evasion not being kosher, you chose to ignore it and continue posting as usual.
I never requested ban evasion, I wanted to appeal on your poor moderation I have tried to be nice and hoped you'll see and try to find a compromise but you only see what you want to see for your own selfish reasons I never requested ban evasion? That doesn't even make sense. He gave you the email that you can appeal to.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:19:51 AM |
|
I warned you yesterday about ban evasion not being kosher, you chose to ignore it and continue posting as usual.
I never requested ban evasion, I wanted to appeal on your poor moderation I have tried to be nice and hoped you'll see and try to find a compromise but you only see what you want to see for your own selfish reasons I never requested ban evasion? That doesn't even make sense. He gave you the email that you can appeal to. do you even follow the order of the posts? He gave me an e-mail to appeal on after he banned my second account
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:27:44 AM |
|
I never requested ban evasion? That doesn't even make sense. He gave you the email that you can appeal to.
do you even follow the order of the posts? He gave me an e-mail to appeal on after he banned my second account I warned you yesterday about ban evasion not being kosher, you chose to ignore it and continue posting as usual.
If he warns you again and you ignore it, don't be surprised if he bans that account too.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
DiamondCardz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:32:27 AM |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
|
BA Computer Science, University of Oxford Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:38:09 AM Last edit: April 21, 2014, 10:51:07 AM by KileZmaj |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
I am cool, I didn't even get annoyed the slighest bit altough I got banned for 30 days for no reason and got a permenent suspension on my other account others would get really pissed I lost 0.6 BTC because of the ban and still I'm not annoyed I am just seeking for justice everyone posts posts like that, it may annoy you but everyone is doing it, then everyone in the off-topic should be banned since in every thread there are around 7-8 posts exactly the same that is what grinds my gears when some are allowed to do something while others aren't even in RL I got kicked out of class multiple times when some students were treated differently then others, my classteacher hated me because I was the only one who stood up to her altough she treated me better then others before that, I didn't want other students to suffer, I hate inequality, especially from superiors I was never afraid of consequences when justice was at stake altough I almost never got the justice I had to do it just to show I wasn't going to take it peacefully.. and so I'm doing the same here so basically I lost -0.6 BTC-28 activity -unable to post -permenantly suspended 1 account I mean, what do I have to lose any more? I lost everything..
|
|
|
|
DiamondCardz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:41:23 AM |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
I am cool, I didn't even get annoyed the slighest bit altough I got banned for 30 days for no reason and got a permenent suspension on my other account others would get really pissed I lost 0.6 BTC because of the ban and still I'm not annoyed I am just seeking for justice everyone posts posts like that, it may annoy you but everyone is doing it, then everyone in the off-topic should be banned since in every thread there are around 7-8 posts exactly the same People do get banned, there just isn't a massive ---BANNED--- header above someone's name if it happened. I guarantee you that if you're the only person on bitcointalk to be banned for this...you wouldn't be banned.
|
BA Computer Science, University of Oxford Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:46:05 AM |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
I am cool, I didn't even get annoyed the slighest bit altough I got banned for 30 days for no reason and got a permenent suspension on my other account others would get really pissed I lost 0.6 BTC because of the ban and still I'm not annoyed I am just seeking for justice everyone posts posts like that, it may annoy you but everyone is doing it, then everyone in the off-topic should be banned since in every thread there are around 7-8 posts exactly the same People do get banned, there just isn't a massive ---BANNED--- header above someone's name if it happened. I guarantee you that if you're the only person on bitcointalk to be banned for this...you wouldn't be banned. some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do it
|
|
|
|
DiamondCardz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:49:31 AM |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
I am cool, I didn't even get annoyed the slighest bit altough I got banned for 30 days for no reason and got a permenent suspension on my other account others would get really pissed I lost 0.6 BTC because of the ban and still I'm not annoyed I am just seeking for justice everyone posts posts like that, it may annoy you but everyone is doing it, then everyone in the off-topic should be banned since in every thread there are around 7-8 posts exactly the same People do get banned, there just isn't a massive ---BANNED--- header above someone's name if it happened. I guarantee you that if you're the only person on bitcointalk to be banned for this...you wouldn't be banned. some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do it It's common sense, really. When someone sees those lower quality posts it'll probably be dealt with by a mod.
|
BA Computer Science, University of Oxford Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:54:05 AM |
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
I am cool, I didn't even get annoyed the slighest bit altough I got banned for 30 days for no reason and got a permenent suspension on my other account others would get really pissed I lost 0.6 BTC because of the ban and still I'm not annoyed I am just seeking for justice everyone posts posts like that, it may annoy you but everyone is doing it, then everyone in the off-topic should be banned since in every thread there are around 7-8 posts exactly the same People do get banned, there just isn't a massive ---BANNED--- header above someone's name if it happened. I guarantee you that if you're the only person on bitcointalk to be banned for this...you wouldn't be banned. some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do it It's common sense, really. When someone sees those lower quality posts it'll probably be dealt with by a mod. but it's not in the forum rules I'v read only this FORUM RULES NO SPAM NO BEGGING (AKA ASKING FOR BITCOINS) NO REFERRAL LINKS
and I have taken it quite literally, I abided those rules for over 6 months I was here law is taken literally, not by common sense forum rules are some sort of law and it's not really a low quality post I simple answered the question asked in the thread
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4312
Merit: 1649
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:00:38 AM |
|
And you're still evading your ban...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
DiamondCardz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:02:58 AM |
|
but it's not in the forum rules I'v read only this FORUM RULES NO SPAM NO BEGGING (AKA ASKING FOR BITCOINS) NO REFERRAL LINKS
and I have taken it quite literally, I abided those rules for over 6 months I was here law is taken literally, not by common sense forum rules are some sort of law and it's not really a low quality post I simple answered the question asked in the thread "No Spam" is basically a wide term for "No annoying/stupid/low-quality posts". I also doubt you were banned for just 1 low-quality post, more like lots over a period of time.
|
BA Computer Science, University of Oxford Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:04:42 AM |
|
some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do itEven your english and writing skills are low quality. I'm not gonna point out your mistakes here but let me highlight something. If you actually read threads around here you would have known this yourself. Also there is this: Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:13:40 AM Last edit: April 21, 2014, 11:28:08 AM by KileZmaj |
|
some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do itEven your english and writing skills are low quality. I'm not gonna point out your mistakes here but let me highlight something. If you actually read threads around here you would have known this yourself. Also there is this: Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
well excuse me, english is not my first language 2. I never make posts like that And you're still evading your ban...
When I first heard this word I used google translate to find it's meaning, it said it had the same meaning as avoiding I assumed it's something like trying to get unbanned I'm just complaining about the ban, rather then requsting it to be denied but 14 days without a single warning first? isn't that excessive use of force I mean it's too much... I could of at least got a warning, 2 weeks is a huge period I had no idea I was doing anything wrong the whole time, if someone warned me, I would of stopped but this way, the only thing I learned is never leave the off-topic or you're going to get banned..
|
|
|
|
DiamondCardz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:14:48 PM |
|
some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do itEven your english and writing skills are low quality. I'm not gonna point out your mistakes here but let me highlight something. If you actually read threads around here you would have known this yourself. Also there is this: Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
well excuse me, english is not my first language 2. I never make posts like that And you're still evading your ban...
When I first heard this word I used google translate to find it's meaning, it said it had the same meaning as avoiding I assumed it's something like trying to get unbanned I'm just complaining about the ban, rather then requsting it to be denied but 14 days without a single warning first? isn't that excessive use of force I mean it's too much... I could of at least got a warning, 2 weeks is a huge period I had no idea I was doing anything wrong the whole time, if someone warned me, I would of stopped but this way, the only thing I learned is never leave the off-topic or you're going to get banned.. Ban evasion means you're dodging your ban by making new accounts. Usually it gets your new account banned and your original ban extended. And after being banned for ban evasion, you're doing it again - bad idea.
|
BA Computer Science, University of Oxford Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:52:20 PM |
|
Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
well excuse me, english is not my first language 2. I never make posts like that And you're still evading your ban...
When I first heard this word I used google translate to find it's meaning, it said it had the same meaning as avoiding I assumed it's something like trying to get unbanned I'm just complaining about the ban, rather then requsting it to be denied but 14 days without a single warning first? I could of at least got a warning, 2 weeks is a huge period I had no idea I was doing anything wrong the whole time, if someone warned me, I would of stopped but this way, the only thing I learned is never leave the off-topic or you're going to get banned.. First: English not being your primary language is not an excuse. English is my third language, this does not matter at all. Second: That is just an example of a useless post, which you have posted many. Third: 14 days is not a long period, a long period would be a Centillion days (10^303). Fourth: This is incorrect. You can also get banned in the off-topic section. (You can make an off-topic reply to a topic in the off-topic section of the forum). Stop complaining, you're making it worse. Wait it out, come back, and watch what you're doing the next time.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:30:58 PM Last edit: April 21, 2014, 05:57:42 PM by KileZmaj |
|
some of them get banned for proper reasons I assume but as I see people who post much lower quality posts then I do they keep posting and posting that means they didn't get banned I guess there should be a rule for banning people for low quality posts because as I said spam and this isn't the same.. instead of posting this shit I could of spammed people with my referral link and got around 30 referrals for the same time ban lol I would of probably even got less lol I did not know that is not allowed how could of I then avoided it? I'v seen people posting like that all the time, if someone told me it's wrong I wouldn't do itEven your english and writing skills are low quality. I'm not gonna point out your mistakes here but let me highlight something. If you actually read threads around here you would have known this yourself. Also there is this: Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
well excuse me, english is not my first language 2. I never make posts like that And you're still evading your ban...
When I first heard this word I used google translate to find it's meaning, it said it had the same meaning as avoiding I assumed it's something like trying to get unbanned I'm just complaining about the ban, rather then requsting it to be denied but 14 days without a single warning first? isn't that excessive use of force I mean it's too much... I could of at least got a warning, 2 weeks is a huge period I had no idea I was doing anything wrong the whole time, if someone warned me, I would of stopped but this way, the only thing I learned is never leave the off-topic or you're going to get banned.. Ban evasion means you're dodging your ban by making new accounts. Usually it gets your new account banned and your original ban extended. And after being banned for ban evasion, you're doing it again - bad idea. does that say somewhere ? how do you know this xD I mean how was I supposed to know that lol so basically when you get banned you're not allowed to make a new account? Some guidelines: 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
well excuse me, english is not my first language 2. I never make posts like that And you're still evading your ban...
When I first heard this word I used google translate to find it's meaning, it said it had the same meaning as avoiding I assumed it's something like trying to get unbanned I'm just complaining about the ban, rather then requsting it to be denied but 14 days without a single warning first? I could of at least got a warning, 2 weeks is a huge period I had no idea I was doing anything wrong the whole time, if someone warned me, I would of stopped but this way, the only thing I learned is never leave the off-topic or you're going to get banned.. First: English not being your primary language is not an excuse. English is my third language, this does not matter at all. Second: That is just an example of a useless post, which you have posted many. Third: 14 days is not a long period, a long period would be a Centillion days (10^303). Fourth: This is incorrect. You can also get banned in the off-topic section. (You can make an off-topic reply to a topic in the off-topic section of the forum). Stop complaining, you're making it worse. Wait it out, come back, and watch what you're doing the next time. please pinpoint where I have made these mistakes, I might have a few typos or missing punctuations but my english is generally good.. when I took an exam on elance I was in top 2% for american-english and 5% for british english .. 2.I have not 3.it is for me, now I'm left without a job for 2 weeks + 2 added on later 4.you can but posts with only pictures a few words are always there while one in the Meta section gets me banned for a month
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:45:26 PM |
|
please pinpoint where I have made these mistakes, I might have a few typos or missing punctuations but my english is generally good.. 2.I have not 3.it is for me, now I'm left without a job for 2 weeks + 2 added on later 4.you can but posts with only pictures a few words are always there while one in the Meta section gets me banned for a month Sometimes typing, grammar and overall composition. Although it is not that bad when you try harder. Since when does 14 days = 1 month? I'm sure that BadBear will take action again, since you're supposed to be banned. We have been trying to tell you this the whole time.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:46:57 PM |
|
please pinpoint where I have made these mistakes, I might have a few typos or missing punctuations but my english is generally good.. 2.I have not 3.it is for me, now I'm left without a job for 2 weeks + 2 added on later 4.you can but posts with only pictures a few words are always there while one in the Meta section gets me banned for a month Sometimes typing, grammar and overall composition. Although it is not that bad when you try harder. Since when does 14 days = 1 month? I'm sure that BadBear will take action again, since you're supposed to be banned. We have been trying to tell you this the whole time. I got 2 weeks added later on, you've said only ban evasion while I had no idea what it meant so basically it means multi-accounting is forbiden when you get banned? I will not post any more since I realized that just now..
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:50:11 PM |
|
I got 2 weeks added later on, you've said only ban evasion while I had no idea what it meant
so basically it means multi-accounting is forbiden when you get banned?
I will not post any more since I realized that just now..
When you get banned, this means that the person behind the account (and the account) is supposed to forbidden from visiting the forums for a period of time. Evading a ban, is what you've done. The easiest way to evade one is to create an account and keep posting. This is against the rules and will get you into more trouble (like it did). Your best and only solution is to wait the ban out.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
KileZmaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:55:27 PM |
|
I got 2 weeks added later on, you've said only ban evasion while I had no idea what it meant
so basically it means multi-accounting is forbiden when you get banned?
I will not post any more since I realized that just now..
When you get banned, this means that the person behind the account (and the account) is supposed to forbidden from visiting the forums for a period of time. Evading a ban, is what you've done. The easiest way to evade one is to create an account and keep posting. This is against the rules and will get you into more trouble (like it did). Your best and only solution is to wait the ban out. okay.. I will send an apology to BadBear since I didn't know what ban evasion was.. have to wait 6 more minutes to send him a message xD
|
|
|
|
|