|
April 20, 2014, 12:54:50 PM |
|
I like NXT but I don't like its horribly skewed distribution of coins to the initial investors -- with the 71 of them holding most of the coins that would ever exist. I've checked out the so-called NXT alternatives, and they don't seem any better to me:
Network Asset System (NAS) is a blatant rip-off of NXT, but with a slightly prettier website. They don't bother to offer anything new, the source code is completely identical to NXT except with some constants altered here and there. The whole codebase, including even the package names and jar file names, are identical to NXT -- just repackaged under a new name and logo. NAS suffers from the same problem a NXT, namely having a shit distribution of the coin. In fact, it's even worse with NAS since most of its coins are concentrated among 36 initial investors.
Nextcoin Lite (NXTL has an ongoing IPO which should be closing anytime now. 60% of the coins will be distributed amongst these 1000 or so IPO investors, with the developers holding the remaining 40% for promotions (15%), development support (15%), misc (10%). The whole thing about NXTL screams amateurish to me, with the numerous spelling errors on the announcement page ('memeber', 'Adress', etc).
New Economy Movement (NEM) is actually something I can get into. The developer teams look decent, at least, and they seem to have the good intention of standing behind the coin long term, while still trying to distribute it to the public fairly. I don't like the fact that in their wordings, NEM seems to try to pass of a lot of NXT features as its own (alias system, asset exchange, etc) and not making it obvious that those are features from NXT. The initial IPO period of NEM is just about over, having gathered ~ 3000 investors from bitcointalk. Their FAQ page in Reddit claims that NEM will include a 'Proof of Importance' (PoI) coin generation that rewards people for actively using NEM as a currency, discouraging hoarding. The people most important in maintaining the network receive the highest coin rewards, not the people with the most NEM. How exactly they would do this is not clear yet.
It's clear to me that NAS and NXTL are quick schemes designed to make the developers richer while still keeping the coins at the hands of the initial investors. None of them, except NEM, also offer or plan to offer anything new to extend the NXT codebase in their 'fork', with NAS being the worst among the three. A fundamental problem with these pure 100% PoS coin is that most of the coins would inevitably be concentrated among early adopters. Since a coin announcement is often made in this forum, people who know about it (and become early investors) are only those who are already a member of the crypto community, locking out the general public.
I think for a crypto '2.0' coin to enjoy a wide adoption, we have to attempt to get the coin into as many hands as possible -- even after the initial IPO is over. This means reaching out to the wider audience beyond just this bitcointalk forum. It probably also means altering the coin's characteristic to prevent hoarding and discourage the rich-gets-richer syndrome, where only big coin holders can actually earn anything from forging, and therefore have no incentives to spend their stash. But the nature of 100% PoS coin means that inevitably developers or some initial investors would always hold most of the coins. So .. How would you propose a fairer distribution scheme of a 100% PoS coin ?
|