Hawker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
 |
February 07, 2012, 02:46:02 PM |
|
It's akin to destroying their currency to diminish the burden of existing debts.
It isn't. They pay low interest because they guarantee that the money is repaid. In a world where there are very few safe investments, German, UK and US debt are treated as safe harbours. The money you put in their bonds gets repaid and that's all the investors want. For better returns, you need to take higher risks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runeks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 07, 2012, 07:07:18 PM |
|
Germany has finally conquered Europe.
Germany is not alone in this. Whomever is regarded as a safe harbor will get this benefit. Denmark is also selling Treasury bonds at a negative interest rate. |
|
|
|
|
Kettenmonster
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bool eval(bool b){return b ? b==true : b==false;}
|
|
February 07, 2012, 09:54:57 PM |
|
Just have a look on how banks "create" money. They have to make sure at most 1 out 10 "customers" let them down.
|
The paining (sic!) is done with the QPainter class inside the paintEvent() method.
(source: my internet)
|
|
|
|
BubbleBoy
|
|
February 08, 2012, 08:41:16 AM
Last edit: February 08, 2012, 08:51:56 AM by BubbleBoy |
|
Negative interest rates are clearly a curious concept. Yes, rational agents would rather hold the money instead of lending them out at negative interest rates. At which bank? Any could die tomorrow and never pay back a thing.
In 500 EUR bills if they have to. The players bidding at these bond auctions are typically banks themselves, and they have a "bank account" that can't possibly go bust: the reserve account with the ECB. It makes little sense for a bank to diminish it's reserves in order to buy negative yield assets. What I suspect is going on here is that there is a strong sentiment of Euro dissolution, at which point all nations would revert to older national currencies. Of course investors would prefer to own debt denominated in Deutsche Marks than Italian Liras or (gasp!) Drachmas. So I think the negative interest rates arise because players don't have faith in the currency itself - they believe euros will soon become non-fungible and some types of euros, like those held by Germans will be worth more. |
|
|
|
Kettenmonster
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bool eval(bool b){return b ? b==true : b==false;}
|
|
February 08, 2012, 08:20:37 PM |
|
... Yes, rational agents would rather hold the money instead of lending them out at negative interest rates. ...
Not understandig what others do, does not necessarily mean they are irrational. Possibly maybe it is just a lack of information. |
The paining (sic!) is done with the QPainter class inside the paintEvent() method.
(source: my internet)
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 08, 2012, 09:16:32 PM |
|
... Yes, rational agents would rather hold the money instead of lending them out at negative interest rates. ...
Not understandig what others do, does not necessarily mean they are irrational. Possibly maybe it is just a lack of information. Its not lack of information. Investment in AAA bonds is done when you have money that you don't want to take risks with. Losing 0.5% per year is way preferable to risking losing a lot more. |
|
|
|
|
|
BubbleBoy
|
|
February 08, 2012, 09:18:13 PM |
|
Not understandig what others do, does not necessarily mean they are irrational. That's precisely what I said: assuming the agents are rational, let's see what other rational explanation can cover this behavior. The explanation some posters are giving, present in the original article ("because they are so worried about the potential for big losses elsewhere") makes no sense whatsoever - whoever is writing this does not understand the notions involved. |
|
|
|
Kettenmonster
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bool eval(bool b){return b ? b==true : b==false;}
|
|
February 10, 2012, 11:39:58 PM |
|
... let's see what other rational explanation can cover this behavior.
There is already another explanation given above. European Banks do not only follow the goddess called greed. They also have to stick to some rules. One of them is called NSFR (Net Stable Funding Ratio). The money those Banks are spending here is not there own, just borrowed. (Remember: Banks may spend roughly 10 times the amount they have in their safes.) But due to european laws (Basel II and Basel III soon to come) they have to spend a certain amount in safe harbours, which are rare these days. Thus the prices run crazy. The loss here has to be covered elsewhere. Which is quite easy, as (not sure on the exact figures) they have 5 times the amount spend on state bonds free for other loans. |
The paining (sic!) is done with the QPainter class inside the paintEvent() method.
(source: my internet)
|
|
|
runeks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 11, 2012, 07:44:06 PM |
|
So it's as simple as: - 1. Central banks make up tons of money to "avoid recession"
- 2. Regulation forces banks to place a part of this money in "safe" locations
- 3. Bond yields plummet, some into the negatives
? |
|
|
|
|
film2240
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
Freelance videographer
|
|
February 12, 2012, 12:23:38 AM |
|
Why does this surprise you? In an uncertain world, the Germans (and the UK and US) offer certainty that you will get 98% of your money back. Where else can you get that certainty? Speaking of certainty.In UK,the law says that in the event of a bank going under,the first £85,000 of your money stored (per institution) in a bank account will be protected.If you have more than this,issues arise unless you store the extra money in a different banking institution.Read here for more info: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/safe-savings |
[This signature is available for rent.BTC/ETH/LTC or £50 equivalent a month]
[This signature is available for rent.BTC/ETH/LTC or £50 equivalent a month]
[This signature is available for rent.BTC/ETH/LTC or £50 equivalent a month]
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 12, 2012, 12:26:48 AM |
|
Why does this surprise you? In an uncertain world, the Germans (and the UK and US) offer certainty that you will get 98% of your money back. Where else can you get that certainty? Speaking of certainty.In UK,the law says that in the event of a bank going under,the first £85,000 of your money stored (per institution) in a bank account will be protected.If you have more than this,issues arise unless you store the extra money in a different banking institution.Read here for more info: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/safe-savingsBut if you have £850,000, do you want to manage 10 bank accounts with little to no interest, or buy a couple bonds that guarantee 98% of your money? |
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 13, 2012, 08:08:51 AM |
|
Why does this surprise you? In an uncertain world, the Germans (and the UK and US) offer certainty that you will get 98% of your money back. Where else can you get that certainty? Speaking of certainty.In UK,the law says that in the event of a bank going under,the first £85,000 of your money stored (per institution) in a bank account will be protected.If you have more than this,issues arise unless you store the extra money in a different banking institution.Read here for more info: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/safe-savingsBut if you have £850,000, do you want to manage 10 bank accounts with little to no interest, or buy a couple bonds that guarantee 98% of your money? Is there not a restriction? That only individuals are covered? I seem to remember several charities bankrupted and local authority pension plans damaged when IceSave went down in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
