[ANN][ENRG]Energycoin - Android Released - Bittrex -

[juicejoyce]

seem nice here!

[Oto3]

Just Add you all into the list. Check your status of your applications.

Checked my status and didn't find myself

[ILikeMagicBeans]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

Hi

I updated my signature 3 days ago but still not on the list, have I done something wrong?

[energycr]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

Hi

I updated my signature 3 days ago but still not on the list, have I done something wrong?

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

[ILikeMagicBeans]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

Hi

I updated my signature 3 days ago but still not on the list, have I done something wrong?

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

Thanks!

[Ziggy]

signature added
and I hope this coin has somthing better than others.

[Crljeni]

Started wallet after some days. It's out of sync...

[RII-promo]

Started wallet after some days. It's out of sync...

Let it open. After some time it will synchronize.
Did you copy energycoin.conf in AppData folder?

[testbug]

please give me Energycoin =)

Have signature here =)

[J-mine]

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

The poster that asked the question isn't ranked as a "member" or above.  So even though they have fulfilled the guidelines of either adding the signature or posting on your facebook page, you retroactively changed the rules to exclude them from a stake unless you decide they work hard enough to promote the coin.  And, how hard would you expect someone to work to promote it when the first thing you did was change the rules to potentially exclude them? 

It's your coin, but excluding probably half the people AFTER they have already met the original guidelines seems like a bad move, in my opinion.  Of course, I also read 1000x more than I ever post and am not ranked as a member either, so what do I know.   

[roadies]

Siggy updated. Looking forward to the IPO and what this coin can do.

(I assume I needed to use my own address in the sig, correct?)

[Philll90]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

It's not fair, to change conditions on the fly...
Anyway, I support dev.

Some people have so many newbies accounts, so I have to avoid that several stakes will be distributed to few people.

To some extent, I think it is more fair now.

Anyways, you still have a chance to get 1 if you continue supporting our community.   

+1

[Zackgeno96]

ill update my sig in alittlebit still need to download the wallet 

[roadies]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

It's not fair, to change conditions on the fly...
Anyway, I support dev.

Some people have so many newbies accounts, so I have to avoid that several stakes will be distributed to few people.

To some extent, I think it is more fair now.

Anyways, you still have a chance to get 1 if you continue supporting our community.   

+1

Could the requirement be that they have a join date sooner than the ANN thread?

Here's a semi answer to my own question: I suppose we will a future where people keep different accounts stockpiled so they can get multiple stakes of new coins.

[energycr]

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

The poster that asked the question isn't ranked as a "member" or above.  So even though they have fulfilled the guidelines of either adding the signature or posting on your facebook page, you retroactively changed the rules to exclude them from a stake unless you decide they work hard enough to promote the coin.  And, how hard would you expect someone to work to promote it when the first thing you did was change the rules to potentially exclude them?  

It's your coin, but excluding probably half the people AFTER they have already met the original guidelines seems like a bad move, in my opinion.  Of course, I also read 1000x more than I ever post and am not ranked as a member either, so what do I know.  

I have to change the rule because there are so many newbies applying for ENRG. And I found that most of them are only cloned accounts of few people (Maybe one person have more than one account). SO do you expect that it would be fair to distribute shares to these cloned accounts?

I can just not distribute ENRG to the newbies accounts. But I decided to give a chance to one of you, not a cloned account. I will check the profiles of all the newbies and see whether they are active and whether they did something real for this community. How could you expect that those unactive accounts will hold the shares. They will just dump their shares and make some quick money. It will just hurt the development of ENRG.

Just remember that ENRG is not a pump and dump coin. We don't need any one in our community not having firm faith on ENRG.

Thanks.  

[Amph]

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

The poster that asked the question isn't ranked as a "member" or above.  So even though they have fulfilled the guidelines of either adding the signature or posting on your facebook page, you retroactively changed the rules to exclude them from a stake unless you decide they work hard enough to promote the coin.  And, how hard would you expect someone to work to promote it when the first thing you did was change the rules to potentially exclude them? 

It's your coin, but excluding probably half the people AFTER they have already met the original guidelines seems like a bad move, in my opinion.  Of course, I also read 1000x more than I ever post and am not ranked as a member either, so what do I know.   

I have to change the rule because there are so many newbies applying for ENRG. And I found that most of them are only cloned accounts of few people (Maybe one person have more than one account). SO do you expect that it would be fair to distribute shares to these cloned accounts?

I can just not distribute ENRG to the newbies accounts. But I decided to give a chance to one of you, not a cloned account. I will check the profiles of all the newbies and see whether they are active and whether they did something real for this community. How could you expect that those unactive accounts will hold the shares. They will just dump and make some quick money. It will just hurt the development of ENRG.

Just remember that ENRG is not a pump and dump coin. We don't need any one in our community not having firm faith on ENRG.

Thanks.  

the funny thing is that you are a newbie too

just a joke don't take it too seriously

but your behaviour remind me of another dev, i dunno...

[energycr]

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

The poster that asked the question isn't ranked as a "member" or above.  So even though they have fulfilled the guidelines of either adding the signature or posting on your facebook page, you retroactively changed the rules to exclude them from a stake unless you decide they work hard enough to promote the coin.  And, how hard would you expect someone to work to promote it when the first thing you did was change the rules to potentially exclude them? 

It's your coin, but excluding probably half the people AFTER they have already met the original guidelines seems like a bad move, in my opinion.  Of course, I also read 1000x more than I ever post and am not ranked as a member either, so what do I know.   

I have to change the rule because there are so many newbies applying for ENRG. And I found that most of them are only cloned accounts of few people (Maybe one person have more than one account). SO do you expect that it would be fair to distribute shares to these cloned accounts?

I can just not distribute ENRG to the newbies accounts. But I decided to give a chance to one of you, not a cloned account. I will check the profiles of all the newbies and see whether they are active and whether they did something real for this community. How could you expect that those unactive accounts will hold the shares. They will just dump and make some quick money. It will just hurt the development of ENRG.

Just remember that ENRG is not a pump and dump coin. We don't need any one in our community not having firm faith on ENRG.

Thanks.  

the funny thing is that you are a newbie too

just a joke don't take it too seriously

but your behaviour remind me of another dev, i dunno...

Yeah, I'm a newbie, because i have to create a new account to release ENRG.

I have to do that, because I want a more fair way to distribute this coin.

And guys, if you have better ideas of distributions, please just post on this thread, and I will really consider it. 

[energycr]

Important Info:

I just updated the OP and added a new bounty: The new coin image design competition..


Who are good at graphics designing can post your piecework on this thread, and our community can post "+1" followed your post if our community like it.

The winner will get +2 stakes as the rewards.

[Ezravdb]

Important Info:

I just update our OP, please read carefully:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589008.0

In section "FAQ", I wrote the qualifications of who could get 1 stake.

 

Hi

I updated my signature 3 days ago but still not on the list, have I done something wrong?

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

I'm on the list already, that quick!

Great work

[web_PC]

nothing wrong. Its just a lot of work load. And we have to verify things. So in short. You'll be included.

The poster that asked the question isn't ranked as a "member" or above.  So even though they have fulfilled the guidelines of either adding the signature or posting on your facebook page, you retroactively changed the rules to exclude them from a stake unless you decide they work hard enough to promote the coin.  And, how hard would you expect someone to work to promote it when the first thing you did was change the rules to potentially exclude them? 

It's your coin, but excluding probably half the people AFTER they have already met the original guidelines seems like a bad move, in my opinion.  Of course, I also read 1000x more than I ever post and am not ranked as a member either, so what do I know.   

I have to change the rule because there are so many newbies applying for ENRG. And I found that most of them are only cloned accounts of few people (Maybe one person have more than one account). SO do you expect that it would be fair to distribute shares to these cloned accounts?

I can just not distribute ENRG to the newbies accounts. But I decided to give a chance to one of you, not a cloned account. I will check the profiles of all the newbies and see whether they are active and whether they did something real for this community. How could you expect that those unactive accounts will hold the shares. They will just dump and make some quick money. It will just hurt the development of ENRG.

Just remember that ENRG is not a pump and dump coin. We don't need any one in our community not having firm faith on ENRG.

Thanks.  

the funny thing is that you are a newbie too

just a joke don't take it too seriously

but your behaviour remind me of another dev, i dunno...

Yeah, I'm a newbie, because i have to create a new account to release ENRG.

I have to do that, because I want a more fair way to distribute this coin.

And guys, if you have better ideas of distributions, please just post on this thread, and I will really consider it. 

My opinion is, that you waste your time on minor things.
When sharecoin is launched, for those purpose dev made some kind of a bot to check all BTT accounts. More than half of the accounts was rejected.
For any relationship it is not good to self arbitrary change the terms on the fly.
As Amph says, you are also newbie, but I also want to ENRG coin, and to you all the best, and don't take it too seriously..