Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 09:11:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Major Problems in Crypto Currency  (Read 1352 times)
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:37:45 PM
Last edit: April 29, 2014, 07:20:33 PM by upekha
 #1

POW:
- enormous power consumption
- bad distribution through big mining farms
- threat of 51% attack

POS:
- encourages hoarding, but not spending
- lots of scamming through lacking transparency in IPOs
- potentially bad distribution through IPOs

same for all:
- length of the blockchain

1. other problems?
2. any solutions?

NEM - New Economy Movement
1715245902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715245902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715245902
Reply with quote  #2

1715245902
Report to moderator
1715245902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715245902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715245902
Reply with quote  #2

1715245902
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
cryptowho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Ask me about Karmacoin


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:38:54 PM
 #2

Major*

 Wink

looking for C++ coders , web-dev and coin-devs to join karmacoin team. We are trying to expand. we have so many goals. Challenge accepted?  PM me.
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:40:08 PM
 #3

Major*

 Wink

hehem .. yeah xD



NEM - New Economy Movement
murraypaul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:44:51 PM
 #4

The third big problem:

- What are they? Are they currencies, designed to be spent, or are they commodities/valuables, designed to increase in value?
The two contradict each other. If you think BTC is going to increase in value, it makes no economic sense to spend it, you would spend USD instead, and keep your BTC.
But the ultimate long term value of BTC is tied to it actually becoming used as a currency (or at least a medium of exchange), and so having actual use, rather than just speculative value.

You need to convince retailers to accept BTC, and for people to spend it, to increase its long term value.
But if you think its long term value will increase, you won't spend it.

BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW
SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:46:42 PM
 #5

the problem of pos (pure pos) is transparency, if they could find a way to spread the coin as much as possible without cheating it might have a bright future
omahapoker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:47:44 PM
 #6

theres just too many coins now. need to weed it out to 60-70
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:54:48 PM
 #7

The third big problem:

- What are they? Are they currencies, designed to be spent, or are they commodities/valuables, designed to increase in value?
The two contradict each other. If you think BTC is going to increase in value, it makes no economic sense to spend it, you would spend USD instead, and keep your BTC.
But the ultimate long term value of BTC is tied to it actually becoming used as a currency (or at least a medium of exchange), and so having actual use, rather than just speculative value.

You need to convince retailers to accept BTC, and for people to spend it, to increase its long term value.
But if you think its long term value will increase, you won't spend it.


"becoming used as a currency" is quite a problem in the crypto world I find. But I think Bitcoin (and other POW currencies) handle that problem through a transaction fee that is almost nil. enormous advantage to fiat money!

POW transaction fees are usually higher, and proportional to what you spend.

NEM - New Economy Movement
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 05:57:49 PM
 #8

theres just too many coins now. need to weed it out to 60-70

I don't think thats such a big problem.
Better a million shitcoins, than a central banking system where i don't have any choice about my currency what so ever!

NEM - New Economy Movement
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:00:38 PM
 #9

the problem of pos (pure pos) is transparency, if they could find a way to spread the coin as much as possible without cheating it might have a bright future

transparency definitly is a issue!
I think NEM is looking quite promising when it comes to the distribution question.

NEM - New Economy Movement
foodies123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:15:42 PM
 #10

the major problem of proof of stake is that there's nothing at stake.

nope
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:20:18 PM
 #11

the major problem of proof of stake is that there's nothing at stake.

what do you mean?

NEM - New Economy Movement
lynn_402
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:52:55 PM
 #12

IMHO, Peercoin has the best solutions to these problems; with a fair initial distribution through proof-of-work (mainly from the time period when mining was more accessible), and the small 1%/year PoS reward is not big enough to justify hoarding all of your coins. Anyways, I'm quite sure most holders of 100% PoW coins won't spend much of them before their value is multiplied. Deflation encourages hoarding, so the small inflation present in PoS coins offset the advantages of the small reward hoarding gives you.
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:55:39 PM
 #13

IMHO, Peercoin has the best solutions to these problems; with a fair initial distribution through proof-of-work (mainly from the time period when mining was more accessible), and the small 1%/year PoS reward is not big enough to justify hoarding all of your coins. Anyways, I'm quite sure most holders of 100% PoW coins won't spend much of them before their value is multiplied. Deflation encourages hoarding, so the small inflation present in PoS coins offset the advantages of the small reward hoarding gives you.

Yeah I like the Peercoin concept as well!

NEM - New Economy Movement
lynn_402
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 06:58:39 PM
 #14

Yeah I like the Peercoin concept as well!
Smiley
Also, a small transaction fee is mandatory, which means less dust-transactions spam, and thus a smaller blockchain. Peercoin's blockchain is still less than 300mb, and it's one of the oldest coins.
knightcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


Stand on the shoulders of giants


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:00:23 PM
 #15

POW:
- enormous power consumption
- bad distribution through big mining farms

POS:
- encourages hoarding, but not spending
- lots of scamming through lacking transparency in IPOs
- potentially bad distribution through IPOs

same for all:
- length of the blockchain

1. other problems?
2. any solutions?

enormous power consumption
is it because you pay your electricity bill in fiat ?

http://www.introversion.co.uk/
mit/x11 licence 18.x/16|o|3ffe ::71
cryptowho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Ask me about Karmacoin


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:05:38 PM
 #16

i thought POS encourages selling coins?

With pow you have to mine any additional coin you want to sell. While in pow you can keep a certain number you want to hoard and keep selling the stake for value. I thought POS would create the ultimate selling obstacle. Is it proving to be the opposite?

looking for C++ coders , web-dev and coin-devs to join karmacoin team. We are trying to expand. we have so many goals. Challenge accepted?  PM me.
lynn_402
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:09:47 PM
 #17

i thought POS encourages selling coins?

With pow you have to mine any additional coin you want to sell. While in pow you can keep a certain number you want to hoard and keep selling the stake for value. I thought POS would create the ultimate selling obstacle. Is it proving to be the opposite?

I don't understand your point. How is selling coins mined through PoW different than selling coins obtained through PoS?
upekha (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100

TDTPJR-P5SGXY-UU2OS6-BPTUV4-NJYQFT-6CWYZP-IA2W


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:12:25 PM
 #18

POW:
- enormous power consumption
- bad distribution through big mining farms

POS:
- encourages hoarding, but not spending
- lots of scamming through lacking transparency in IPOs
- potentially bad distribution through IPOs

same for all:
- length of the blockchain

1. other problems?
2. any solutions?

enormous power consumption
is it because you pay your electricity bill in fiat ?


Its because the planet is already quite fucked up.

NEM - New Economy Movement
cryptowho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Ask me about Karmacoin


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:14:13 PM
 #19

POS is easy to stake. while mining would be much harder down the road and not to mention expensive


take dogecoin for exmaple. can you mine it easy? if it were POS , you could buy 5 millions and sit there stake additional coins effortless.

Now everyone that owns coins are ultimately"mining" thus creating additional coins.

looking for C++ coders , web-dev and coin-devs to join karmacoin team. We are trying to expand. we have so many goals. Challenge accepted?  PM me.
lynn_402
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 29, 2014, 07:16:02 PM
 #20


enormous power consumption
is it because you pay your electricity bill in fiat ?


Its because the planet is already quite fucked up.

And negative aspects of mining includes not only the waste of electricity, but the quantity of electronic equipments that gets obsolete in less than a year.

Also, OP, you should consider adding the threat of 51% attack and mining centralization under PoW.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!