cryptomines
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:37:28 PM |
|
difficulty retargets in X number of blocks, is all I'm asking
|
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:40:27 PM |
|
From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
|
|
|
|
4roxx101
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:49:41 PM |
|
From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
Good luck getting a straight answer from this guy.
|
Mine Hard Mine Fast Mine The Future........
|
|
|
(oYo)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:52:07 PM |
|
Even dogecoin has its haters! I think the point the OP is trying to make is... Doesn't matter how "unfair" the launch is, or whether he lied or not, as long he can still get the (naive) masses interested in CYC and accept it. There's no need for them to come here to bitcointalk and read this thread, so they'll never know. He's going to advertise this coin on other sites to people who don't know much about cryptocurrencies, but want to "stick it to the man". Basically, all they need to do is just DL the new wallet and start mining. Really, the less they know about cryptocurrency the better. They will think they are fighting the good fight against the NWO, spreading awareness and hopefully get a few cool coins (and maybe cards) in the process.
|
|
|
|
th3joker
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:56:26 PM |
|
From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
Difficulty changes as hashing power is added, this would lead me to believe that the hashing power has remained constant for the past 3 hours?
|
|
|
|
th3joker
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:58:01 PM |
|
Worldcoin difficulty reduced dramatically post scharmbeck debacle as the hashing power dropped so did the difficulty, so it can go up as well as down.
|
|
|
|
SomeRelax
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:58:40 PM |
|
ahh, guys, the announce post says 33 coins per block but i see 64 coins ber block in suchpool
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:58:48 PM |
|
While I'm doing a write-up? You can't even get your facts straight! From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
Good luck getting a straight answer from this guy.
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 02:59:59 PM |
|
int64 static GetBlockValue(int nBits, int nHeight, int64 nFees) { int64 nSubsidy = 33; if(nHeight > 1000000) return nFees; nSubsidy *= COIN; return nSubsidy + nFees; }
ahh, guys, the announce post says 33 coins per block but i see 64 coins ber block in suchpool
|
|
|
|
th3joker
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:00:22 PM |
|
Early adopters mine more coins its a simple fact, if you aren't in at the very start then you miss out. How is it that people are involved in crypto and still don't know that.
|
|
|
|
th3joker
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:01:47 PM |
|
int64 static GetBlockValue(int nBits, int nHeight, int64 nFees) { int64 nSubsidy = 33; if(nHeight > 1000000) return nFees; nSubsidy *= COIN; return nSubsidy + nFees; }
ahh, guys, the announce post says 33 coins per block but i see 64 coins ber block in suchpool Suchpool has made a mistake in their config then. nSubsidy = 33 is correct
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:02:13 PM Last edit: May 23, 2014, 03:27:21 PM by ConspiracyCoin |
|
LOL! Not quite like that, but I get what you're saying. Even dogecoin has its haters! I think the point the OP is trying to make is... Doesn't matter how "unfair" the launch is, or whether he lied or not, as long he can still get the (naive) masses interested in CYC and accept it. There's no need for them to come here to bitcointalk and read this thread, so they'll never know. He's going to advertise this coin on other sites to people who don't know much about cryptocurrencies, but want to "stick it to the man". Basically, all they need to do is just DL the new wallet and start mining. Really, the less they know about cryptocurrency the better. They will think they are fighting the good fight against the NWO, spreading awareness and hopefully get a few cool coins (and maybe cards) in the process.
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:04:04 PM |
|
Because the difficulty has not changed in the last 3 hours, it doesn't mean anything negative. From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
|
|
|
|
whatdidshedo
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:07:18 PM |
|
While I'm doing a write-up? You can't even get your facts straight! From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
Good luck getting a straight answer from this guy. i have to admit you are like a politician turning arguments away onto other successful coins, even tough i was mad at first due to being on suchpool who shutdown and i missed first 5000 blocks i mined some later. Alex Jones makes alternative media look bad but people still listen to him. so i rented small rig for 6 hours and mined some 800 coins.let us know if any exchange is coming and for other complaining read this article about 99% of all coins being instamined or whatever you call it : http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#an_investor_s_investigation_into_the_mining_statistics_of_bitcoin_alternativesPS: for a healthy dose of alternative media listen to 'NO AGENDA SHOW"
|
|
|
|
tiddy
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:08:05 PM |
|
maybe the x13 will be the next hot topic
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:10:48 PM |
|
We used other coins as a reference, some were fixated on the block time. As we mentioned, if a ton of hashing power hit bitcoin when first launched, you would have seen blocks per second or less. While I'm doing a write-up? You can't even get your facts straight! From Darkcoin thread on DGW: " I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly."
So, why hasn't the difficulty adjusted at all in at least the last 3 hours?
Good luck getting a straight answer from this guy. i have to admit you are like a politician turning arguments away onto other successful coins, even tough i was mad at first due to being on suchpool who shutdown and i missed first 5000 blocks i mined some later. Alex Jones makes alternative media look bad but people still listen to him. so i rented small rig for 6 hours and mined some 800 coins.let us know if any exchange is coming and for other complaining read this article about 99% of all coins being instamined or whatever you call it : http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#an_investor_s_investigation_into_the_mining_statistics_of_bitcoin_alternativesPS: for a healthy dose of alternative media listen to 'NO AGENDA SHOW"
|
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:14:58 PM |
|
My facts aren't straight? You claim its based on DGW yet your OP states "Difficulty Retarget: KGW & Time-Warp Fix". You seem to be a bit confused, Dude. Difficulty not adjusting in 3 hours means there is a problem, your difficulty re-targeting isn't working. Darkcoin hashrate is high yet it re-adjusts diff every block.
Darkcoin
Block Validity Finder Time Difficulty 72971 Confirmed 0utcast 05/22/2014 19:56:42 3,363.1035 69658 Confirmed donnk 05/16/2014 19:07:42 2,377.0041 69640 Confirmed mycoins 05/1 6/2014 18:15:06 2,996.4751 69244 Confirmed mycoins 05/16/2014 00:52:38 3,246.7649 69041 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 16:07:04 3,002.0024 69031 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:42:34 2,692.1140 69027 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:27:15 2,750.2473 69024 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:23:15 2,735.7334 69023 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:22:39 2,422.9486 68948 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 12:07:43 2,352.5407 68753 Confirmed Mortimer452 05/15/2014 03:38:59 2,558.6716
Conspiracycoin
Block Validity Finder Time Difficulty 7836 118 left linqiaoli1 05/23/2014 14:44:55 64.0000 7825 107 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:31:37 64.0000 7819 101 left Stardust 05/23/2014 14:26:11 64.0000 7812 94 left 4roxx101 05/23/2014 14:23:02 64.0000 7804 86 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:14:18 64.0000 7799 81 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:09:34 64.0000 7791 73 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:02:00 64.0000 7787 69 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:59:12 64.0000 7775 57 left kyke 05/23/2014 13:50:36 64.0000 7773 55 left 4roxx101 05/23/2014 13:48:28 64.0000 7750 32 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:31:23 64.0000 7749 31 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:31:03 64.0000 7747 29 left appossum 05/23/2014 13:29:25 64.0000 7744 26 left metalliking 05/23/2014 13:27:46 64.0000 7743 25 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:26:17 64.0000 7742 24 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:25:53 64.0000 7739 21 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:19:37 64.0000 7737 19 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:19:14 64.0000 7733 15 left Stardust 05/23/2014 13:16:51 64.0000 7730 12 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:15:08 64.0000
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:21:42 PM |
|
When I mentioned facts, I was talking to the other guy - check my posts! We used DGW as opposed to KGW. DGW has gone through several iterations (updates), latest update will kick-in with the next wallet update. The coin is stable now and the hashrate is great for a new coin. My facts aren't straight? You claim its based on DGW yet your OP states "Difficulty Retarget: KGW & Time-Warp Fix". You seem to be a bit confused, Dude. Difficulty not adjusting in 3 hours means there is a problem, your difficulty re-targeting isn't working. Darkcoin hashrate is high yet it re-adjusts diff every block.
Darkcoin
Block Validity Finder Time Difficulty 72971 Confirmed 0utcast 05/22/2014 19:56:42 3,363.1035 69658 Confirmed donnk 05/16/2014 19:07:42 2,377.0041 69640 Confirmed mycoins 05/1 6/2014 18:15:06 2,996.4751 69244 Confirmed mycoins 05/16/2014 00:52:38 3,246.7649 69041 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 16:07:04 3,002.0024 69031 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:42:34 2,692.1140 69027 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:27:15 2,750.2473 69024 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:23:15 2,735.7334 69023 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 15:22:39 2,422.9486 68948 Confirmed anonymous 05/15/2014 12:07:43 2,352.5407 68753 Confirmed Mortimer452 05/15/2014 03:38:59 2,558.6716
Conspiracycoin
Block Validity Finder Time Difficulty 7836 118 left linqiaoli1 05/23/2014 14:44:55 64.0000 7825 107 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:31:37 64.0000 7819 101 left Stardust 05/23/2014 14:26:11 64.0000 7812 94 left 4roxx101 05/23/2014 14:23:02 64.0000 7804 86 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:14:18 64.0000 7799 81 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:09:34 64.0000 7791 73 left anonymous 05/23/2014 14:02:00 64.0000 7787 69 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:59:12 64.0000 7775 57 left kyke 05/23/2014 13:50:36 64.0000 7773 55 left 4roxx101 05/23/2014 13:48:28 64.0000 7750 32 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:31:23 64.0000 7749 31 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:31:03 64.0000 7747 29 left appossum 05/23/2014 13:29:25 64.0000 7744 26 left metalliking 05/23/2014 13:27:46 64.0000 7743 25 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:26:17 64.0000 7742 24 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:25:53 64.0000 7739 21 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:19:37 64.0000 7737 19 left anonymous 05/23/2014 13:19:14 64.0000 7733 15 left Stardust 05/23/2014 13:16:51 64.0000 7730 12 left agsuprnova 05/23/2014 13:15:08 64.0000
|
|
|
|
ConspiracyCoin (OP)
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:24:38 PM |
|
I updated the first post to show that we used DGW instead of KGW - thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
|
|
SomeRelax
|
|
May 23, 2014, 03:32:12 PM |
|
int64 static GetBlockValue(int nBits, int nHeight, int64 nFees) { int64 nSubsidy = 33; if(nHeight > 1000000) return nFees; nSubsidy *= COIN; return nSubsidy + nFees; }
ahh, guys, the announce post says 33 coins per block but i see 64 coins ber block in suchpool Suchpool has made a mistake in their config then. nSubsidy = 33 is correct my fault, sorry suchpool shows 33 i think i made a mistake by seeing the difficulty and now i see there is a argue here about the difficulty that has sticked on 64, strange
|
|
|
|
|