|
LostDutchman
|
 |
May 28, 2014, 02:31:28 AM |
|
The only way that can save US from falling from the world stage is another World War. Their will be a world within 10 years.
Paardon me but horseshit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Candystripes
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
***THIS ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE***
|
|
May 28, 2014, 02:32:58 AM |
|
2015 is the year, they're going to have war with the Mexicans.
|
---------------------------------
No longer under the possession of Candystripes.
Account is currently dormant.
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
May 28, 2014, 02:34:56 AM |
|
2015 is the year, they're going to have war with the Mexicans.
Well, that one would last about a day and a half. One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime. |
|
|
|
|
onlyu
|
|
May 28, 2014, 03:23:22 AM |
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
May 28, 2014, 04:39:22 AM |
|
2014
Why do you people not understand that the USA has been at war for the last ten years or so? WTF? |
|
|
|
|
Nik1ab
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:09:20 AM |
|
US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.
|
No signature ad here, because their conditions have become annoying.
|
|
|
|
dadugan
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:02:31 AM |
|
2014
Why do you people not understand that the USA has been at war for the last ten years or so? WTF? I think the original poster is asking when the next major war with another country will occur. |
|
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:21:06 PM |
|
2014
Why do you people not understand that the USA has been at war for the last ten years or so? WTF? I think the original poster is asking when the next major war with another country will occur. Oh, OK. Thanks. |
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:06:56 PM |
|
Well, that one would last about a day and a half.
One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime.
It won't be that simple. Imagine the American marines fighting in Mexico against all those drug cartels (Sinaloa cartel, Los Zetas.etc). The last time I heard, the drug cartels alone were having more than 200,000 soldiers. Also, some of the American states (such as New Mexico) are having an absolute Mexican majority population. |
|
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:14:05 PM |
|
Well, that one would last about a day and a half.
One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime.
It won't be that simple. Imagine the American marines fighting in Mexico against all those drug cartels (Sinaloa cartel, Los Zetas.etc). The last time I heard, the drug cartels alone were having more than 200,000 soldiers. Also, some of the American states (such as New Mexico) are having an absolute Mexican majority population. I guess you've never heard of stealth bombers? |
|
|
|
u9y42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:18:55 PM |
|
Well, that one would last about a day and a half.
One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime.
It won't be that simple. Imagine the American marines fighting in Mexico against all those drug cartels (Sinaloa cartel, Los Zetas.etc). The last time I heard, the drug cartels alone were having more than 200,000 soldiers. Also, some of the American states (such as New Mexico) are having an absolute Mexican majority population. Well, considering they get their weapons from the US to begin with, it should at least be fairly easy to disarm most of them if you really wanted to.  But yes, that seemed very much like a "USA! We're number one!" sort of post, which completely forgets that you have to deal with the aftermath of the war. |
|
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:12:21 AM |
|
Well, that one would last about a day and a half.
One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime.
It won't be that simple. Imagine the American marines fighting in Mexico against all those drug cartels (Sinaloa cartel, Los Zetas.etc). The last time I heard, the drug cartels alone were having more than 200,000 soldiers. Also, some of the American states (such as New Mexico) are having an absolute Mexican majority population. Well, considering they get their weapons from the US to begin with, it should at least be fairly easy to disarm most of them if you really wanted to. But yes, that seemed very much like a "USA! We're number one!" sort of post, which completely forgets that you have to deal with the aftermath of the war. The "aftermath" of a war with Mexico? yeah. Close and enforce the border, wait until they come to us for aid and then set very strict terms, reparations, etc. |
|
|
|
u9y42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:41:59 AM |
|
2015 is the year, they're going to have war with the Mexicans.
Hey, you could be more right than you know.  "Mexican military chopper flies into US, shoots at border guards": http://rt.com/usa/168940-mexican-military-helicopter-shoots/PS: this was obviously just an isolated incident, no need to go and get your guns.  |
|
|
|
|
DrG
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035
|
|
June 28, 2014, 07:42:13 AM |
|
US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.
I notice you're typing in English and not in German. Interesting. Hitler was such the humanitarian  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nik1ab
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:05:12 AM |
|
US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.
I notice you're typing in English and not in German. Interesting. Hitler was such the humanitarian What the heck are you talking about? |
No signature ad here, because their conditions have become annoying.
|
|
|
DirtFighter
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:33:16 AM |
|
US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.
I notice you're typing in English and not in German. Interesting. Hitler was such the humanitarian What the heck are you talking about? Ahh.. this thread suits you a little better than the "end with a question" thread. DrG is talking about the fact that if it where not for Americas "war on humanity" as you call it, you would be writing your post in German if you where aloud to write it at all. The US has and does participate in wars it should not but..it has participated in wars that mattered the most and prevailed I am sure you have heard of World War 2…maybe you are a youngster and just don't know history well enough yet. |
Take a DEEP breath…thats still free
|
|
|
Fatpony
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
June 29, 2014, 12:07:08 PM |
|
I think you got that question wrong. It should have been " Will there ever be the time when USA won't be at WAR "
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nik1ab
|
|
June 29, 2014, 12:45:28 PM |
|
US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.
I notice you're typing in English and not in German. Interesting. Hitler was such the humanitarian What the heck are you talking about? Ahh.. this thread suits you a little better than the "end with a question" thread. DrG is talking about the fact that if it where not for Americas "war on humanity" as you call it, you would be writing your post in German if you where aloud to write it at all. The US has and does participate in wars it should not but..it has participated in wars that mattered the most and prevailed I am sure you have heard of World War 2…maybe you are a youngster and just don't know history well enough yet. I'm well aware of history, but the US had almost nothing to do with WW2. And nazi Germany was at war with most of mankind, not all of it. While the US kills people of all so called "races" just for the money. |
No signature ad here, because their conditions have become annoying.
|
|
|
u9y42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
|
|
June 29, 2014, 12:52:02 PM |
|
I'm well aware of history, but the US had almost nothing to do with WW2.
And nazi Germany was at war with most of mankind, not all of it. While the US kills people of all so called "races" just for the money.
I wouldn't say that they had almost nothing to do with it; their participation was important, but it's true that their role is often vastly overstated. Still, at least you can't blame Americans for discrimination; they only see in shades of green. |
|
|
|
|
|
LittleD (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2014, 04:07:41 PM |
|
bump |
|
|
|
|
Poll
