Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 14, 2014, 05:42:33 AM |
|
Bitcoin
|
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin.
|
|
|
Zyborg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 04, 2014, 07:00:20 AM |
|
Bitcoin
You sir, are a genius.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4652
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 04, 2014, 12:43:44 PM |
|
This is silly.
None of the polls have enough participants to be relevant, and none of the options that I'm willing to accept are even offered as choices. You can hold all the obscure polls you want with 100 to 200 participants. It won't matter. In the end, language develops organically, and people will use whatever they want regardless of what your poll decides.
This. This. This.You can't decide to call something a certain name by a ridiculous poll. If it doesn't happen organically you can't force names on things. Just because 200 people are OK with starting to call goats "hurberburber", they'd still have to explain that it means goat whenever using the word speaking to someone. well its wierd you say that, because hamburgers contain no pork.. they should be called beefburgers, yet it only took 1 merchant to start the craze off, and we are now stuck with it. this is why i dont like centoshi.. because it should be hectoshi as the denominational naming list. over all if you look at all of the different polls, bit always get highest vote and least hated, in comparison to other individual choices.. so businesses see that as the preference. hense why businesses are now using it
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
spazzdla
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 04, 2014, 12:50:48 PM |
|
It's mtb, milibtc and bits.. give up that is what it is now.
|
|
|
|
DobZombie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 04, 2014, 12:54:53 PM |
|
To be honest, the term "bit" gave me the shits when I first heard of it(and kept hearing about it)
I'm warming to it.
|
Tip Me if believe BTC1 will hit $1 Million by 2030 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
|
|
|
101111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:17:46 AM |
|
Talk about fighting a losing lost battle.
ubit - (confusingly pronounced both 'mubit' and 'youbit') would quickly get shortened to 'bit' in common usage anyway, so you may as well go straight to bit, as indeed everyone seems to be doing
and centoshi, who knows wtf that is
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4652
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:23:28 AM |
|
Talk about fighting a losing lost battle.
ubit - (confusingly pronounced both 'mubit' and 'youbit') would quickly get shortened to 'bit' in common usage anyway, so you may as well go straight to bit, as indeed everyone seems to be doing
and centoshi, who knows wtf that is
centoshi is a hundred th of a satoshi.. definitely not 100 satoshi
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
bitfreak!
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:26:34 AM |
|
It's microbit. End of story.
cBTC = bitcent = 0.01 BTC mBTC = millibit = 0.001 BTC uBTC = microbit = 0.000001 BTC
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
101111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:31:17 AM |
|
It's microbit. End of story.
microbits are too small, not needed yet
|
|
|
|
101111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:37:11 AM |
|
Talk about fighting a losing lost battle.
ubit - (confusingly pronounced both 'mubit' and 'youbit') would quickly get shortened to 'bit' in common usage anyway, so you may as well go straight to bit, as indeed everyone seems to be doing
and centoshi, who knows wtf that is
centoshi is a hundred th of a satoshi.. definitely not 100 satoshi next: millitoshi, microtoshi ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
bitfreak!
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:41:41 AM Last edit: June 05, 2014, 01:54:27 AM by bitfreak! |
|
It's microbit. End of story.
microbits are too small, not needed yet What does that have to do with anything? This thread is about what to call 100 satoshis (aka 0.000001 BTC). Microbit is the most organic and technically correct term I've seen so far. It's also the accepted term according to the wiki. PS - 'Bit" is a ridiculous term for 1 μBTC because it has no relevance. If anything bit should be another term for satoshi.
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
bitcoinforhelp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:47:38 AM |
|
none of the above, they are worse
|
|
|
|
jc01480
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:50:20 AM |
|
Good to know we have some neurotic aggravating senseless poll going. I was getting concerned. Seriously, we have bigger concerns than this psychotic horseshit.
|
|
|
|
101111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:51:32 AM |
|
It's microbit. End of story.
microbits are too small, not needed yet What does that have to do with anything? This thread is about what to call 100 satoshis (aka 0.000001 BTC). Microbit is the most organic and technically correct term I've seen so far. It's also the accepted term according to the wiki. PS - 'Bit" is a ridiculous term for 1 μBTC because it has no relevance. If anything Bit should be another term for Satoshi. we know the technical terms; the whole idea is find non-technical terms.
|
|
|
|
bitfreak!
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 01:56:16 AM |
|
we know the technical terms; the whole idea is find non-technical terms.
Microbitcoin is the full technical term, microbit is the shorter casual version. There's no need for anything else.
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
101111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 02:24:46 AM |
|
we know the technical terms; the whole idea is find non-technical terms.
Microbitcoin is the full technical term, microbit is the shorter casual version. There's no need for anything else. Yeah microbit isn't too bad, but it's about more than simply casual versions of existing technical terms. It does away - from a UX perspective - with centi, milli, and micro, and proposes using natural (or counting) numbers: 500 bits, 5,000 bits, 100,000 bits. It's about changing to a 'normalised' currency format that most people will readily understand.
|
|
|
|
btcton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 02:51:18 AM |
|
we know the technical terms; the whole idea is find non-technical terms.
Microbitcoin is the full technical term, microbit is the shorter casual version. There's no need for anything else. If you are thinking something different won't come up, you are quite wrong.
|
The signature campaign posters adding useless redundant fluff to their posts to reach their minimum word count are lowering my IQ.
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
amarha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 05, 2014, 07:06:16 AM |
|
Anything other than microbitcoin is seriously misguided. Microbitcoin is the logical choice.
Centoshi is ridiculous and doesn't even make sense at all.
Bits is bad too. Should have simply been ubits.
|
|
|
|
Zyborg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2014, 01:25:18 PM |
|
Anything other than microbitcoin is seriously misguided. Microbitcoin is the logical choice.
Centoshi is ridiculous and doesn't even make sense at all.
Bits is bad too. Should have simply been ubits.
Because it is the logical choice it's the one being used. No forum poll will change that. These posts are useless.
|
|
|
|
|