Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 08:24:43 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [RELEASE] Liquidcoin (Speculation based)  (Read 27140 times)
MrGaSp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 10:31:07 PM
 #61


First of all, this coin is in no way aiming to replace bitcoin. It was designed for speculation only.
It is based on Tenebrix, wich means it's using the CPU friendly hashing algorithm.
Unique Features
  • Fixed difficulty (0.05)
  • Block reward reduces 4% every 1000 blocks, it does not increase ever. Minimum block reward is 1LQC
  • Because of it's fixed difficulty, transactions will never be slow
  • No pre mined coins

Liquidcoin's block reward will reach 10LQC after ~40.000 blocks.

Without further BS, http://www.mediafire.com/?ecwv6j6m9o7ckbc (Windows client + daemon + source code)
https://github.com/nicksasa/Liquidcoin
#liquidcoin on irc.freenode.net

Releasing a coin without announcing it at least a week before hand == premine.

Considering the difficulty never changes, i don't think its that big of a deal. And besides, all the more reason to JUMP ON FAST oO


Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 11:08:51 PM
 #62

New update - http://www.mediafire.com/?tbowv449nbaq37x
Removed source from the zip, since it's moved to github now.

- Fixed the icons
- Fixed address validation issue

Sherkel
aka Tombstoner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 11:12:23 PM
 #63

On one of my computers, the client won't connect to the network at all. Left it for a while, still 0 connections to the network.

What do you get when you cross dominoes and The Matrix?
<A dominatrix!>
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 11:24:09 PM
 #64

On one of my computers, the client won't connect to the network at all. Left it for a while, still 0 connections to the network.
Tried forwarding port 3737 ? Also make sure it isn't stopped by a firewall.

ssvb
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 12:58:54 AM
 #65

Yeah but that is the nerfed down pretend-scrypt used by litecoin, right? Deliberately toned down so botnets can use it. Because using a proper version of scrypt would make people whose machine have been infected by botnets notice something is being processed.

So basically there still aren't any alt-coins using a proper full scrypt, they are all just fakes set up for botnets to deploy.
Hey, I guess it could be interesting to continue discussing your theory here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55314.0 Wink There is also a weird thread started by Come-from-Beyond, where he seems to claim that he is already able to set arbitrary hash rate per GHz in his miner (maybe still within some reasonable range), supposedly by exploiting some flaw in scrypt implementation with 1024, 1, 1 parameters: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55670.0
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414

Newbie


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 07:53:36 AM
 #66

Yeah but that is the nerfed down pretend-scrypt used by litecoin, right? Deliberately toned down so botnets can use it. Because using a proper version of scrypt would make people whose machine have been infected by botnets notice something is being processed.

So basically there still aren't any alt-coins using a proper full scrypt, they are all just fakes set up for botnets to deploy.
Hey, I guess it could be interesting to continue discussing your theory here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55314.0 Wink There is also a weird thread started by Come-from-Beyond, where he seems to claim that he is already able to set arbitrary hash rate per GHz in his miner (maybe still within some reasonable range), supposedly by exploiting some flaw in scrypt implementation with 1024, 1, 1 parameters: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55670.0

I closed my researches in this direction. The final result i got was: Scrypt is good, but [1024, 1, 1] was a bad choice. If some other coin use other parameters for Scrypt then everything should be OK.
btc-e.com
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


View Profile WWW
January 19, 2012, 09:36:06 AM
 #67

https://btc-e.com/news/55

Bitcoin \ Litecoin \ Namecoin \ Novacoin <-> Exchange btc-e.com

BTC-E.com // Биржа по автоматической торговле Bitcoin \ Litecoin \ Namecoin \ Novacoin <-> Exchange btc-e.com
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 19, 2012, 10:43:56 AM
 #68

Thank you!

Also, new update out. It's HIGHLY reccomended you update to v4 or latest github because we added some checkpoints, increased the initial DL of the blockchain, applied a performance fix and changed the fees to a somewhat better value. http://www.mediafire.com/?hv0e5qjlgkpzlzb

Stokkie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 02:58:40 PM
 #69

Thank you!

Also, new update out. It's HIGHLY reccomended you update to v4 or latest github because we added some checkpoints, increased the initial DL of the blockchain, applied a performance fix and changed the fees to a somewhat better value. http://www.mediafire.com/?hv0e5qjlgkpzlzb

What fees?

LTC: LZ7nz6ExS3Yg3uvNaa3pKdM6MUpDrkwx2H
Nachtwind
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:01:57 PM
 #70

I'd guess transaction fees?
ArtForz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:03:43 PM
 #71

Thank you!

Also, new update out. It's HIGHLY reccomended you update to v4 or latest github because we added some checkpoints, increased the initial DL of the blockchain, applied a performance fix and changed the fees to a somewhat better value. http://www.mediafire.com/?hv0e5qjlgkpzlzb

What fees?
*checks commit log*
Default transaction fee was increased from 0.0005/kB to 0.1/kB.
Seems to still use standard BTC rules for which tx don't require a fee.
See LTC TX spam fiasco for the reason.

bitcoin: 1Fb77Xq5ePFER8GtKRn2KDbDTVpJKfKmpz
i0coin: jNdvyvd6v6gV3kVJLD7HsB5ZwHyHwAkfdw
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:25:44 PM
 #72

Thank you!

Also, new update out. It's HIGHLY reccomended you update to v4 or latest github because we added some checkpoints, increased the initial DL of the blockchain, applied a performance fix and changed the fees to a somewhat better value. http://www.mediafire.com/?hv0e5qjlgkpzlzb

What fees?
*checks commit log*
Default transaction fee was increased from 0.0005/kB to 0.1/kB.
Seems to still use standard BTC rules for which tx don't require a fee.
See LTC TX spam fiasco for the reason.

So even after the LTC TX spam fiasco someone release an alt-coin w/ same vulnerability?

I mean I thought in theory the point of alt-coins is to be a learning environment.  If scam-coins aren't going to patch the mistakes of prior scam-coins then they aren't even make a token effort to innovate.
ArtForz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:29:15 PM
 #73

So even after the LTC TX spam fiasco someone release an alt-coin w/ same vulnerability?

I mean I thought in theory the point of alt-coins is to be a learning environment.  If scam-coins aren't going to patch the mistakes of prior scam-coins then they aren't even make a token effort to innovate.
Won't get any disagreement from me, lazy coin creator is lazy... but hey, at least he fixed it when I pointed it out to him. Wink

bitcoin: 1Fb77Xq5ePFER8GtKRn2KDbDTVpJKfKmpz
i0coin: jNdvyvd6v6gV3kVJLD7HsB5ZwHyHwAkfdw
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:37:34 PM
 #74

So even after the LTC TX spam fiasco someone release an alt-coin w/ same vulnerability?

I mean I thought in theory the point of alt-coins is to be a learning environment.  If scam-coins aren't going to patch the mistakes of prior scam-coins then they aren't even make a token effort to innovate.
Won't get any disagreement from me, lazy coin creator is lazy... but hey, at least he fixed it when I pointed it out to him. Wink

Well I think the whole announce and launch within same day "fad" has something to do with it.  Satoshi took almost a year from his initial paper to genesis block and received significant feedback over that time period.
Kumala
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 514


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:46:41 PM
 #75

can you guys host those windows binaries somewhere else? The site is not accessible from China (where I happen to be at the moment), you are missing out the possibility of a huge crowd of miners and users.
drakahn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 03:54:09 PM
 #76

block reward graph

14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
Sherkel
aka Tombstoner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 05:58:54 PM
 #77

Anyone know how long it should take a block at about 8 khash/s? Been running this for hours with no luck.

What do you get when you cross dominoes and The Matrix?
<A dominatrix!>
3phase
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313


Third score


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 05:59:22 PM
 #78

I'd guess transaction fees?

What is a transaction?

Fiat no more.
Δοκιμάστε το http://multibit.org - Bitcoin client τώρα και στα Ελληνικά
drakahn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 06:00:53 PM
 #79

Anyone know how long it should take a block at about 8 khash/s? Been running this for hours with no luck.
~7.5 hours/block

14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
Sherkel
aka Tombstoner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 06:10:32 PM
 #80

Anyone know how long it should take a block at about 8 khash/s? Been running this for hours with no luck.
~7.5 hours/block
Thanks.

What do you get when you cross dominoes and The Matrix?
<A dominatrix!>
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!