Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 12:35:51 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [RELEASE] Liquidcoin (Speculation based)  (Read 27152 times)
caish5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 12:47:14 PM
 #41

Now it's fixed
Thanks

Bitvolcano YAC, BBQ and WDC P2Pools at http://bitvolcano.com
1481416551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481416551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481416551
Reply with quote  #2

1481416551
Report to moderator
1481416551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481416551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481416551
Reply with quote  #2

1481416551
Report to moderator
1481416551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481416551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481416551
Reply with quote  #2

1481416551
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481416551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481416551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481416551
Reply with quote  #2

1481416551
Report to moderator
1481416551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481416551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481416551
Reply with quote  #2

1481416551
Report to moderator
ehmdjii
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 12:54:19 PM
 #42

what are the dependencies to compile? i am getting:

Code:
root@sadfwww:~/Liquidcoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
makefile.unix:131: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o'
makefile.unix:128: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o'
g++ -c -pthread -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -DNOPCH  -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_SSL -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -MMD -o obj/nogui/crypter.o crypter.cpp
In file included from crypter.cpp:9:0:
headers.h:36:20: fatal error: db_cxx.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/nogui/crypter.o] Error 1

BTC: 1LsD5HpnX1Kfyti7CnHiVB1rjUEXGqmR2H
LTC: LQbpdMZmYyJa9bJG6NweBNxkSTfgZorkrG
caish5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 12:56:41 PM
 #43

Have a look at the LTC/TBX/FBX info and do that!

Bitvolcano YAC, BBQ and WDC P2Pools at http://bitvolcano.com
drakahn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 01:12:47 PM
 #44

anyone want to buy some liquidcoin?

let the bidding commence

14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
Schwede65
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 309


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 03:58:48 PM
 #45

i had a virus-alarm with downloaded "liquidcoinv2.zip" on w7-64

avast found and deleted
Win32:Rootkit-gen(Rtk)

dont know what it is, but this doesn't inspire much confidence among...
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 04:06:59 PM
 #46

i had a virus-alarm with downloaded "liquidcoinv2.zip" on w7-64

avast found and deleted
Win32:Rootkit-gen(Rtk)

dont know what it is, but this doesn't inspire much confidence among...
Pooler's minerd is detected by some anti viruses, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55038.0 (compare the MD5 hashes if you want)
Same minerd is used with LTC.

Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 04:55:56 PM
 #47

- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization.

Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 04:57:40 PM
 #48

- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization.
We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans.

LZ
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


Satoshi everywhere!


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 05:25:11 PM
 #49

Are there any differences between liquidcoin and liquidcoinv2?

"Never invest unless you can afford to lose your entire investment." © S3052
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 05:38:01 PM
 #50

Are there any differences between liquidcoin and liquidcoinv2?
V2 of the zip had a missing dll included and the minerd from pooler.

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 07:00:17 PM
 #51

For fairness since I've been attacking Realcoin.  Yes, LQC is a "scam" just like every other altcoin.  The difference is LQC isn't making claims of being anything more than it is [Speculation Based], and doesn't have a premine (other than the advantage Nicksasa had of being able to start it before anybody had a chance to read the thread).

I'm fine with altcoins that are just here for people to play around with.  I'm not fine with altcoins which claim to be doing a bunch of development into usability/security without actually changing the protocol, since its a drain on development time which could be used to improve Bitcoin.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 07:28:34 PM
 #52

haha someone finally got around to doing Ponzicoin.  We should have one every week so that everyone can play a round Smiley

(BFL)^2 < 0
Snapman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291


BTCRadio Owner


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 07:29:15 PM
 #53

For fairness since I've been attacking Realcoin.  Yes, LQC is a "scam" just like every other altcoin.  The difference is LQC isn't making claims of being anything more than it is [Speculation Based], and doesn't have a premine (other than the advantage Nicksasa had of being able to start it before anybody had a chance to read the thread).

I'm fine with altcoins that are just here for people to play around with.  I'm not fine with altcoins which claim to be doing a bunch of development into usability/security without actually changing the protocol, since its a drain on development time which could be used to improve Bitcoin.

Couldnt have said it better myself.

BTCRadio: 17cafKShokyQCbaNuzaDo5HLoSnffMNPAs
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 07:32:10 PM
 #54

seems made to be solo mined, kind of anti pool (almost)

No because as network gets faster and faster the rate of orphans will only increase and your effective generation rate will decline.  The only solution is to form a pool and continue your orphaned chain until it either becomes the longest chain or falls too far behind.  The more hashing power the less you lose to orphans. 

Logically even if pools formed the most valuable pool is the largest pool and quickly one would see consolidation of hashing power to >51%.  At that point anyone using other pools or solo is simply choosing a lower return on their hashing power.  In time the single pool will have 100% hashing power.

DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 07:34:24 PM
 #55

- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization.
We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans.

And at 34 MH is is ~5s.
And at 85 MH it is ~1s.
And at 170 MH it is ~1s.

At a hypothetical (lets pretend this has a future) 1 GH/s it is <0.2s.  (5 blocks a second with burst as high as 3x that).  At 1GH/s orphan rate would be 90%+ even w/ network propogation time of 1 sec (unrealistic).

The only one immune to that would be a massive pool with 51%+ hashing power that would simply ignore other blocks and continue its own chain thus ensure it is never orphaned. 
markm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 08:00:51 PM
 #56

I would prefer a coin with a large pre-mine (preferably all the coins) that are sold on an exchange. 

Unfortunately Open Transactions turned out to need massive and deep re-writing otherwise my exchange would be open by now, but the re-write is almost complete to soon you will be able to use secure Open Transactions client<->sevrver technology to trade in a number of "fully pre-mined" coins.

The catch however is that such coins cannot afford "miners" until their transaction volume, thus transaction fees, become large enough to "pay" miners. So initially they will be Open Transaactions based only, with only those that actually take off enough to justify the expense of usign a blockchain actually moving to an (open*) blockchain.

(* They maybe however go back to the friend to friend blockchain method they used with their early testnets, or look again at "licensed miners" concepts.)

-MarkM-

Browser-launched Crossfire client now online (select CrossCiv server for Galactic  Milieu)
Free website hosting with PHP, MySQL etc: http://hosting.knotwork.com/
Nicksasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 08:28:02 PM
 #57

If your having trouble finding blocks with your cpu, try to adjust the scantime to 2 or even 1. Default is a bit too low for such network speeds.

Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 08:36:39 PM
 #58

We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans.

And at 34 MH is is ~5s.
And at 68 MH it is ~2s.
And at 136 MH it is ~1s.

At a hypothetical (lets pretend this has a future) 1 GH/s it is <0.2s.
And this is why this altcoin will implode. There is no future for it. Pump and dump asap.

Buy & Hold
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 08:43:05 PM
 #59


First of all, this coin is in no way aiming to replace bitcoin. It was designed for speculation only.
It is based on Tenebrix, wich means it's using the CPU friendly hashing algorithm.
Unique Features
  • Fixed difficulty (0.05)
  • Block reward reduces 4% every 1000 blocks, it does not increase ever. Minimum block reward is 1LQC
  • Because of it's fixed difficulty, transactions will never be slow
  • No pre mined coins

Liquidcoin's block reward will reach 10LQC after ~40.000 blocks.

Without further BS, http://www.mediafire.com/?ecwv6j6m9o7ckbc (Windows client + daemon + source code)
https://github.com/nicksasa/Liquidcoin
#liquidcoin on irc.freenode.net

Releasing a coin without announcing it at least a week before hand == premine.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Sherkel
aka Tombstoner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 10:21:03 PM
 #60

Miner's not connecting
EDIT: Never mind, one in the client seems to work.

What do you get when you cross dominoes and The Matrix?
<A dominatrix!>
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!