WE WILL PAY MORE FOR YOUR SIGNATURE! Up to 0.0014 btc per post!

[monbux]

Ok just saw the site, and I will admit that it's pretty cool.
I've always wanted a site that was binary options with bitcoins... without a 30 minute signup  Thanks!

Edit:  I would really prefer it if you guys had minimum bet set to 0.001 BTC, allowing users to first give the site a few test trys... I gambled a couple of times and lost most of it lol  So yeah, change to 1 mBTC minimum bets?

Another Edit:  Are you guys planning to go a bit more in depth and add accounts, and dashboards where we can see our progress?

"I have been provided an upfront amount to assure that all members will be paid out."

and

"Don't worry, we will back campaign runner with additional amount if number of participators will grow fast"

Oh... so that means that howzar can make a great deal of money by simply abandoning all of his signature campaigns.  Oh, that's scary. :/
I'm still interested but just wondering why the real owners don't just start it themselves..  Sorry howzar, but I wouldn't cal you a "trusted third party/escrow"... 

[1714691283]

1714691283

[1714691283]

1714691283

[1714691283]

1714691283

[1714691283]

1714691283

[1714691283]

1714691283

[Mobo]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

[u9y42]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

Not an auspicious start for this campaign... do you know for how long the ban is, and will you still be able to access funds and pay everyone?

[u9y42]

Oh... so that means that howzar can make a great deal of money by simply abandoning all of his signature campaigns.  Oh, that's scary. :/
I'm still interested but just wondering why the real owners don't just start it themselves..  Sorry howzar, but I wouldn't cal you a "trusted third party/escrow"...  

The real owners of the site are still new to the forum, and upon a couple of requests for escrow, advance pay, weekly pay, etc., dealing with other new forum members, and a discussion about how they had copied the signature from PD initially, probably thought it simpler to just hand it over to someone of the community to handle. Can't say I blame them.

EDIT: you can see the original thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

[UpDown.BT]

You can count me in

Post count: 73

Address: 16vcWox5WV8oTJP8Xnrm16Cepndtz9qyvN

Approved

[UpDown.BT]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

Not an auspicious start for this campaign... do you know for how long the ban is, and will you still be able to access funds and pay everyone?

Funds on the wallet, and bitcoin wallet can't be banned. )

[Mitchell]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

Not an auspicious start for this campaign... do you know for how long the ban is, and will you still be able to access funds and pay everyone?

Funds on the wallet, and bitcoin wallet can't be banned. )

You guys should have picked a more trusted member. A banned person running a campaign creates a really bad imagine for your company.

[UpDown.BT]

Joining.

Posts:   61

BTCTC: 1JmiFT8tN1VSoEyxnzeDBwh3hKpdnJEhU

Approved

[UpDown.BT]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

Not an auspicious start for this campaign... do you know for how long the ban is, and will you still be able to access funds and pay everyone?

Funds on the wallet, and bitcoin wallet can't be banned. )

You guys should have picked a more trusted member. A banned person running a campaign creates a really bad imagine for your company.

We picked a member who already have an experience in running that kind of campaign.

[UpDown.BT]

Ok just saw the site, and I will admit that it's pretty cool.
I've always wanted a site that was binary options with bitcoins... without a 30 minute signup  Thanks!

Edit:  I would really prefer it if you guys had minimum bet set to 0.001 BTC, allowing users to first give the site a few test trys... I gambled a couple of times and lost most of it lol  So yeah, change to 1 mBTC minimum bets?

Another Edit:  Are you guys planning to go a bit more in depth and add accounts, and dashboards where we can see our progress?

Yes, we're planning.

[Mitchell]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.new#new

I've been banned.

I will do my best to keep up with everything until this clears.

Not an auspicious start for this campaign... do you know for how long the ban is, and will you still be able to access funds and pay everyone?

Funds on the wallet, and bitcoin wallet can't be banned. )

You guys should have picked a more trusted member. A banned person running a campaign creates a really bad imagine for your company.

We picked a member who already have an experience in running that kind of campaign.

Experience is not everything. I would prefer someone who never done it, but who has a great trust rating and knows how to deal with people. Teaching is easy, gaining trust is hard. But well, that is my opinion. Good luck with your website and this campaign!

Your website looks great by the way. Really like the design.

[u9y42]

Experience is not everything. I would prefer someone who never done it, but has a great trust rating and is great with people. Teaching is easy, gaining trust is hard.

Are you applying for the position? 

Funds on the wallet, and bitcoin wallet can't be banned. )

Good to know. I hope everything goes well with the campaign from now on.

[hilariousandco]

Experience is not everything. I would prefer someone who never done it, but has a great trust rating and is great with people. Teaching is easy, gaining trust is hard.

Are you applying for the position? 

It kinda seems that way. The ban was unfortunately timed I must admit, but not all bans are for nefarious reasons, though I don't know the full details in this case.

[Carra23]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

[hilariousandco]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

Like I said before that clause and everything else was just copied from Ritz's thread, but it doesn't give me much faith when someone just copies an entire thread and its terms (not to mention copying PD's signatures). It's right to be sceptical of these deals, but they can prove our scepticism wrong and that they are legitimate like Ritz has done.

[UpDown.BT]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

We're not saying "if they do not get enough paying customers". We say about traffic quality just because we don't want to stimulate spammers and avoid flooding of the forum with a crap posts.

[Mitchell]

Experience is not everything. I would prefer someone who never done it, but has a great trust rating and is great with people. Teaching is easy, gaining trust is hard.

Are you applying for the position?  

I do not, as far as I know. Just trying to help out

EDIT: I like to state, once again, that I have nothing against the person doing the campaign, the owner of the website and the website itself. Not at all

[UpDown.BT]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

Like I said before that clause and everything else was just copied from Ritz's thread, but it doesn't give me much faith when someone just copies an entire thread and its terms (not to mention copying PD's signatures). It's right to be sceptical of these deals, but they can prove our scepticism wrong and that they are legitimate like Ritz has done.

See no problem in copying terms from the guys who run a big campaign already and knows everything about. Anyway, it doesn't matter what the terms we have, in this kind of deals criticism is a very common part of discussions.

[crazyivan]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

We're not saying "if they do not get enough paying customers". We say about traffic quality just because we don't want to stimulate spammers and avoid flooding of the forum with a crap posts.

Unless you can guarantee payment to people who add your signature and display it for a month, nobody ll join. Why do we care about the number of people clicking through. You pay us to add your signature and post meaningful posts.

[hilariousandco]

Auspicious start to the campaign. first they have a get out clause which says even if you post if they do not get enough paying customers its your fault. Then they run it through someone who gets banned, has multiple accounts and in the past has behaved quite badly in the Ritz campaign.

There are others, do not get greedy and end up losing all just for a small increase.

Like I said before that clause and everything else was just copied from Ritz's thread, but it doesn't give me much faith when someone just copies an entire thread and its terms (not to mention copying PD's signatures). It's right to be sceptical of these deals, but they can prove our scepticism wrong and that they are legitimate like Ritz has done.

See no problem in copying terms from the guys who run a big campaign already and knows everything about. Anyway, it doesn't matter what the terms we have, in this kind of deals criticism is a very common part of discussions.

It is part of the process. Don't take it personally. Most people are sceptical of deals around here, and if they're not then they should be. A lot of the new deals that sprung up around here a few months ago scammed their users and didn't pay out at the end of the month.

And maybe you could've copied a different deal or at least just used others as a guide rather than pretty much copying it all verbatim  .