[POOL] Solo Mining - Many Coins Including The Big 3: Bitcoin Litecoin Zetacoin

[tuaris]

Following the link above...


This webpage is not available

DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN

Peace,
J

That's very strange.  What are you using hardware and operating system wise?

Sometimes ISP's have temporary DNS issue.  

Try clearing your DNS cache (http://www.noip.com/support/knowledgebase/how-do-i-flush-my-windows-dns-cache/)
using Google DNS servers (https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/using),
or OpenDNS (https://use.opendns.com/).  

The domain does resolve properly
http://www.intodns.com/securepayment.cc

Code:

dig securepayment.cc @208.67.222.222

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5 <<>> securepayment.cc @208.67.222.222
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3454
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;securepayment.cc.              IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
securepayment.cc.       38400   IN      A       63.247.147.167

;; Query time: 81 msec
;; SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222)
;; WHEN: Fri Jul 10 12:35:09 EDT 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 61

[johnsquared2]

seems to be back now... who knows.
Is that page you show above only available to you?

Peace,
J

[tuaris]

seems to be back now... who knows.
Is that page you show above only available to you?

Peace,
J

It's publicly accessible



http://mining.securepayment.cc/pools/ppcoin/miners.php

[johnsquared2]

Cool, thanks. I see I am fluctuating between 5th and 7th.

Have you made and decisions on changing the # of confirmations?

Thanks,
J

[tuaris]

Cool, thanks. I see I am fluctuating between 5th and 7th.

Have you made and decisions on changing the # of confirmations?

Thanks,
J

I'm still watching it closely.  If the usage continues as it has been for the past few days for at least another week, I will lower it to 250.
For now, I will decrease the fees on the service.

All blocks will start getting paid at 97% effective next hour.  This includes any block already found and not yet paid.

[johnsquared2]

Nice, Thanks.

These last few days have to have been a boost in income, especially with the guy who has 500TH here now. Has he/she been around long? I just started here 4 days ago. Found 1 block, hoping for 1 every 2 to 3 days with the 5.2TH I have pointed here....

J

[PANDiNSKi]

Website down for me also - "ERR_NAME_RESOLUTION_FAILED". 

[tuaris]

Website down for me also - "ERR_NAME_RESOLUTION_FAILED". 

Might be a regional DNS issue with some ISP(s) since not everyone is having trouble. 
Have you tried the tips I mentioned in an earlier post?

[PANDiNSKi]

Thanks - I changed the static DNS on my router to Google's DNS server. It now loads the webpage 

[PANDiNSKi]

Is there still no way of manually setting the difficulty? As I think 50K is far too high for my multiple miners. I sometimes get the odd Antminer C1 receiving work at a difficulty of 17.5K which seems more efficient as it's that miner that finds the most blocks (I'm mining Peercoin by the way). Any help/advice/explanation on this is appreciated in advance.

Thanks!

[tuaris]

Is there still no way of manually setting the difficulty? As I think 50K is far too high for my multiple miners. I sometimes get the odd Antminer C1 receiving work at a difficulty of 17.5K which seems more efficient as it's that miner that finds the most blocks (I'm mining Peercoin by the way). Any help/advice/explanation on this is appreciated in advance.

Thanks!

The front end for this feature has a security issue that I am still working through.  If you provide me (PM) a signed message with the desired difficulty, I can go ahead and manually set it.

[PANDiNSKi]

Is there still no way of manually setting the difficulty? As I think 50K is far too high for my multiple miners. I sometimes get the odd Antminer C1 receiving work at a difficulty of 17.5K which seems more efficient as it's that miner that finds the most blocks (I'm mining Peercoin by the way). Any help/advice/explanation on this is appreciated in advance.

Thanks!

The front end for this feature has a security issue that I am still working through.  If you provide me (PM) a signed message with the desired difficulty, I can go ahead and manually set it.

Will do - AFK at the moment. Thanks.

[tuaris]

Is there still no way of manually setting the difficulty? As I think 50K is far too high for my multiple miners. I sometimes get the odd Antminer C1 receiving work at a difficulty of 17.5K which seems more efficient as it's that miner that finds the most blocks (I'm mining Peercoin by the way). Any help/advice/explanation on this is appreciated in advance.

Thanks!

The front end for this feature has a security issue that I am still working through.  If you provide me (PM) a signed message with the desired difficulty, I can go ahead and manually set it.

Will do - AFK at the moment. Thanks.

Great news!  The security department has given the stamp of approval on the settings front end.  I will be deploying it to the production servers shortly.  Expect a small interruption of mining since this requires a stratum service restart.

[tuaris]

Updates are complete and the control panel is live for all pools/coins



Difficulty can be manually selected and VARDIFF can be disabled.



New values are applied instantly (may take up to 3 minutes in some cases) upon verification.



You do not need to restart your miner.

[johnsquared2]

I found these 2 blocks, but my wallet only shows one deposit today (7/21)

185584: 2015-07-19 02:59:33 GMT-5 | PQZLmcX7Q1ar1BKSturSCmhR3KuaEh2i3n | paid
185346: 2015-07-17 18:10:55 GMT-5 | PQZLmcX7Q1ar1BKSturSCmhR3KuaEh2i3n | paid

When I click on the block link, I get some strange page that says I broke the internet...

Peace,
J


EDIT: All There Now!

[notabeliever]

Not sure if this was mentioned and search didn't work for me.

Question: Proper naming for 2 antminers on the same coin port with same address.
Question: If a block is pending and found by <man1> is it attached to the address or the antminer that found it. When one goes down is the block orphaned or picked up by the second one.

url:1111 -u <same address.man1> -p x
url:1111 -u <same address.man2> -p x

or address only and your software will merge them?

[tuaris]

Not sure if this was mentioned and search didn't work for me.

Question: Proper naming for 2 antminers on the same coin port with same address.
Question: If a block is pending and found by <man1> is it attached to the address or the antminer that found it. When one goes down is the block orphaned or picked up by the second one.

url:1111 -u <same address.man1> -p x
url:1111 -u <same address.man2> -p x

or address only and your software will merge them?

The pool does not care if you have 100's of antminers all using the same address.  It will treat all your found blocks as a single 'account'.

If both your antminers use the same address, it does not matter which one finds the block or if it goes offline.  Once a block is found by your miner and it's confirmed, it's yours regardless of what happens afterwards (unless there is a 51% attack on the coin's blockchain).

'Orphan' block's occur when someone else finds a better block first.  It has no relation to what you are describing here.

[notabeliever]

Not sure if this was mentioned and search didn't work for me.

Question: Proper naming for 2 antminers on the same coin port with same address.
Question: If a block is pending and found by <man1> is it attached to the address or the antminer that found it. When one goes down is the block orphaned or picked up by the second one.

url:1111 -u <same address.man1> -p x
url:1111 -u <same address.man2> -p x

or address only and your software will merge them?

Yes how about the multiple miners using the same address?

[TrinityCoin]

I am fairly sure this pool is a FRAUD.
I have been mining the litecoin pool and it is saying that I am getting a bunch of blocks which is obviously not true for litecoin with 5 Mh/s
So what is happening? The pool operator is using my hashpower to mine a lower difficulty coin and keeping all of it for himself.
Prove me wrong.

[tuaris]

I am fairly sure this pool is a FRAUD.
I have been mining the litecoin pool and it is saying that I am getting a bunch of blocks which is obviously not true for litecoin with 5 Mh/s
So what is happening? The pool operator is using my hashpower to mine a lower difficulty coin and keeping all of it for himself.
Prove me wrong.

Please do not jump to conclusions and make an accusation like this without some due diligence.  It's comes off as being unprofessional.  Please review your miner's settings and confirm the following:

What is the command line you are using?

Litecoin is on port 3339
URL is sratum+tcp://litecoin.securepayment.cc

What is the Litecoin address you are using?

I can search the database and veryfy that you are indeed on the correct or incorrect stratum port.

Do you have backup pools setup?

Perhaps your mining client is falling back to an alternate pool and finding blocks there.

What is the message you are receiving?  

It's normal for a mining client to display "Stratum from pool 0 detected new block".  Which means a new block was detected in the network, not necessarily mined by you.