This is why you shouldn't vote Hilary

[noviapriani]

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks  as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns. 

[1714145914]

1714145914

[sana8410]

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks  as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns. 

Also let's face it, if handguns weren't used in homicides, the numbers would drop dramatically. Rifles and shit are really small numbers, and as far as I know, there aren't many restrictions on long guns in Canada. I'm not sure what the solution is. It certainly isn't significant legislation, because the second amendment will hold up mostly. There needs to be reasonable discussion by people who know about guns, not the dipstick politicians who try for ridiculous changes based on emotion or looks.

There should be a way to deal with it, but it certainly won't be dealt with by pro gun nuts, or anti gun nuts. Those people only want to keep to their own agenda.

[sana8410]

Her menstrual blood will attract bears.

Did you hear that? Bears.

Bears? Anyone seen any bear in this thread? =)))))
But honestly , wasn't this thread open to discuss her "plans" not her looks and smells?

I think shes starting to like Mr Grinch the one who stole cristmas

[umair127]

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks  as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns. 

Also let's face it, if handguns weren't used in homicides, the numbers would drop dramatically. Rifles and shit are really small numbers, and as far as I know, there aren't many restrictions on long guns in Canada. I'm not sure what the solution is. It certainly isn't significant legislation, because the second amendment will hold up mostly. There needs to be reasonable discussion by people who know about guns, not the dipstick politicians who try for ridiculous changes based on emotion or looks.

There should be a way to deal with it, but it certainly won't be dealt with by pro gun nuts, or anti gun nuts. Those people only want to keep to their own agenda.

Its funny that you said this cause my freinds boyfriend is coo coo and I really dont know a guy with OCD or ACD get a gun so easily.  HE would flip out if anyone challenges him.

[bryant.coleman]

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

100% correct. Whenever I think of Hillary, I remember this equation. 

+ ==>

[umair127]

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

100% correct. Whenever I think of Hillary, I remember this equation. 

+ ==>

Ok Never mind Chelsea looks more like Mr Grinch.

[umair127]

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

I'll say that people don't always vote based on looks, and actually , thank god they don't.
Image the whole world run by pornstars .

I would vote for Hilary because she is environmentally correct and wears nylon or wool pantsuits. Given the surface area between her thunder thighs, and calculating the static electricity she generates just by walking around, she alone could provide enough electricity for a city the size of East St. Louis.

[Charlie Prime]

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse. 

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

[hackjack]

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse. 

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

[LostDutchman]

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.  

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

[doubledog]

mkay, i'll vote her, too bad~

[Hazir]

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.  

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

I don't know about that. It is pretty fitting outfit for me. Standing collar is so Mao'ish? I am sure PR specialist put everything in that photo, it is fully politically correct, haha.

[bryant.coleman]

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

Trust me. Billary will be even worse than chairman Mao. The chairman caused some 60 million or so deaths, Billary will score many times that number. She will be most war-crazy president that the US will ever have in its existence.

[LostDutchman]

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.  

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

I don't know about that. It is pretty fitting outfit for me. Standing collar is so Mao'ish? I am sure PR specialist put everything in that photo, it is fully politically correct, haha.

Well, the collar is indeed not quite right but I think most get my point!

[bryant.coleman]

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10.
Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. 

[niothor]

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10.
Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. 

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.
 

[LostDutchman]

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10.
Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain.  

Yep and the election of Hillary will portend the end of the Republic.

[bryant.coleman]

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.

Rand Paul is pro-Bitcoin. Can you imagine the kind of boost which the digital currency might receive if he becomes the POTUS? I will assure you that it will be even beyond the wildest of your dreams. 

[hilariousandco]

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

I'll say that people don't always vote based on looks, and actually , thank god they don't.
Image the whole world run by pornstars .

Well we nearly got Palin  .

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.

Rand Paul is pro-Bitcoin. Can you imagine the kind of boost which the digital currency might receive if he becomes the POTUS? I will assure you that it will be even beyond the wildest of your dreams.  

Rand wont ever win, but I don't think he understand Bitcoin properly though, or has some weird ideas of what he wishes/wants it to be: http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda/377015/surprise-rand-paul-would-have-ruined-bitcoin-trying-make-it-hard-currency-patrick

[niothor]

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.

Rand Paul is pro-Bitcoin. Can you imagine the kind of boost which the digital currency might receive if he becomes the POTUS? I will assure you that it will be even beyond the wildest of your dreams. 

It's not about that. In two years many things can change both in politics and cryptos.
Just like in politics , a new candidate might emerge or the old one might have some serious health problems making him withdraw.