Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 04:22:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: bitcoind sendmany vs. sendtoaddress  (Read 694 times)
gigamike (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:12:04 AM
 #1

Guys,

Any advantage if i gonna use sendmany over sendtoaddress?

Im planning to send payouts to many btc address so im thinking of looping to sendtoaddress OR single command of sendmany.

TIA

Mike
1715660572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715660572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715660572
Reply with quote  #2

1715660572
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715660572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715660572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715660572
Reply with quote  #2

1715660572
Report to moderator
1715660572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715660572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715660572
Reply with quote  #2

1715660572
Report to moderator
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:13:55 AM
 #2

Sendmany creates a single transaction with multiple outputs.
Sendtoaddress would be one transaction per address.

Outputs are relatively small, inputs are much larger so using sendmany reduces the average tx size on a per output basis.
gigamike (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:26:56 AM
 #3

Sendmany creates a single transaction with multiple outputs.
Sendtoaddress would be one transaction per address.

Outputs are relatively small, inputs are much larger so using sendmany reduces the average tx size on a per output basis.

thanks for the info.

It doesn't mean as well that there will be much lesser Transaction fee?

TIA

Mike
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015



View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:37:57 AM
 #4

Sendmany creates a single transaction with multiple outputs.
Sendtoaddress would be one transaction per address.

Outputs are relatively small, inputs are much larger so using sendmany reduces the average tx size on a per output basis.

thanks for the info.

It doesn't mean as well that there will be much lesser Transaction fee?

TIA

Mike
"Minimum" fee should be significantly reduced. If you're splitting a relatively large output into many outputs, there's a much greater savings. Outside of having all the outputs linked together in the blockchain (which may be a privacy concern), I don't know of any disadvantages to sendmany... maybe messier to deal with if manually entering it into the console?
gigamike (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:58:44 AM
 #5

Sendmany creates a single transaction with multiple outputs.
Sendtoaddress would be one transaction per address.

Outputs are relatively small, inputs are much larger so using sendmany reduces the average tx size on a per output basis.

thanks for the info.

It doesn't mean as well that there will be much lesser Transaction fee?

TIA

Mike
"Minimum" fee should be significantly reduced. If you're splitting a relatively large output into many outputs, there's a much greater savings. Outside of having all the outputs linked together in the blockchain (which may be a privacy concern), I don't know of any disadvantages to sendmany... maybe messier to deal with if manually entering it into the console?

thanks for info Smiley
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!