Paid Signatures Increases Likelihood of Getting Banned

[BitcoinEXpress]

Amazing this is still a problem two years later.

This thread is still fact.


~BCX~

[Your Point Is Invalid]

I agree, users often dont report people if they dont have a signature.
Apparently the logic is that you cannot spam if you arent wearing a signature.
TBH most spammers are in signature campaigns, other users dont have the drive to spam.


also, how did you find this thread?

[Evildrum]

There is very clear contradictions in how signatures are viewed versus people that do not have a signature.
A forum that allows this option should not allow people to be treated as second class citizens based on a signature.
Why some one that writes three words can get away with accusing some one of spam if beyond me but these are the double standards we live with here.

Glad it was brought up that moderators are not all on the same page with signatures because I was feeling like there was a agenda to make things harder or more scrutinized for people that wear signatures. So when a Mod
tells me to not be in a rush they are showing their bias and I know to stay clear of that person.

[BitcoinEXpress]

also, how did you find this thread?

I'm a fan of the OP!

All kidding aside Lauda has whined ad nausem about people not searching the forum and posting in threads that already exist.

Lauda is very pro-necto so this is in honor of him.


 


~BCX~

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Amazing this is still a problem two years later.

This thread is still fact.


~BCX~

Yep but it doesn't surprise me at all because theymos hasn't made any changes that I know of.  Account sales still happen, signature campaigns are still going on in full force and these dirt floor, barefoot idiots are still motivated to make easy money by posting unintelligible garbage.

So yeah.  Let's all meet up again on this topic in 2018.  Lol

[robelneo]

I can speak for my self I am not even thinking of my signature campaign when I am actively posting on this forum although there was a time I was reported for posting a lot just to reach twenty but none of them are spam post and they are made on threads that I fully support or has stakes on it..

[Daisy14]

~BCX~
[/quote]Yep but it doesn't surprise me at all because theymos hasn't made any changes that I know of.  Account sales still happen, signature campaigns are still going on in full force and these dirt floor, barefoot idiots are still motivated to make easy money by posting unintelligible garbage.

So yeah.  Let's all meet up again on this topic in 2018.  Lol

[/quote]














Err... and to think you are also into signature campaigns... beats me

[betlord90]

why there are people bit angry when someone got sigs? dont you want  people open a sig campaign in this furom??? this is can make advertiser go to another furom to advertise their services and thats why this site gets traffic because of sig campaigns here in this furom and i think that really helps, and for those who got sig in their name it has good contribution to this furom why?? because many people came here and it raise traffic and businessman or site owner will come here to advertise thats why sigs and sig campaign member are helpful.

fuck those sig haters,

why dont you look at yourself and bothering for another people here,

get your own life sig haters and go to other furom if you don want to see people in sig campaign..



 

 Betlord90

[minifrij]

why there are people bit angry when someone got sigs?

It's not the signatures that are the problem, it's the useless bullshit that people post to exploit the reward given by these signatures.

thats why this site gets traffic because of sig campaigns here in this furom and i think that really helps, and for those who got sig in their name it has good contribution to this furom why?? because many people came here and it raise traffic

The question is, is that traffic the sort that we want on the forum? Do we really want a mindless bunch of people - not reading threads and spamming the forum - to come here just to satisfy their own greed for some Bitcoin? IMO, the answer is an easy and definite no.
The traffic that signature campaigns bring is the traffic that want's to exploit them for all that they're worth (3/4 of the time). These are not quality members of the forum, and not people we want to be attracting.

why dont you look at yourself and bothering for another people here,

Because retards that spam one sentence posts (due to their signature campaigns) do nothing but bother the people here for learning/community discussion. They are a much bigger problem currently than the people complaining about signature campaigns.

get your own life sig haters and go to other furom if you don want to see people in sig campaign..

Why should other people move from where they enjoy being just so people can take advantage of it (with a negative effect)?
Tell you what, if you move out of your house and let me use it as my personal trash can then I will never complain about signature spammers again. Fair deal?

What a useless addition to your post.

[Evildrum]

@minifrij

If you ask me the person you are replying to is a dupe account being used to push the agenda against signatures.
Have seen it once or twice lately in threads where signature users need to be looked at as idiots drooling all over their computers.

The silence by those that usually push the issue is usually another way to sniff it out.
Means they are about to get their way or they are sitting back plotting.

[TheButterZone]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1274316.0;all seems like sig ad post count bumping galore.

[tidus1097]

These are the threads where all butthurt users who did not get a chance to enter in any of the campaigns, aggregate themselves and complain against them.
Having a feature to turn off your signature and a ignore button to do the needful, is enough for you guys to avoid signature spammers as much as you can.

If you had a true intention of contributing towards bitcoin community then you wouldn't have wasted time in these bullshit discussions which has no end point to it. Oh the irony!

[Lauda]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1274316.0;all seems like sig ad post count bumping galore.

There are a few examples of such threads (that are still not locked). I've reported it.

These are the threads where all butthurt users who did not get a chance to enter in any of the campaigns, aggregate themselves and complain against them.

I doubt that. There are people who are currently signature participants and would like to see them gone for good.

If you had a true intention of contributing towards bitcoin community then you wouldn't have wasted time in these bullshit discussions which has no end point to it. Oh the irony!

It has a point. Signature campaigns are horrible and I doubt their potential benefits to the ecosystem. Most of the senior members that I've had interaction with agree on removal of signature campaigns.

[Evildrum]

I doubt that. There are people who are currently signature participants and would like to see them gone for good.

How can you as a mod be unbiased in handling moderation when you clearly take issue with signatures. The irony as already pointed out is that you wear one yourself. So you must be referring to ones self when you made this comment.

It has a point. Signature campaigns are horrible and I doubt their potential benefits to the ecosystem. Most of the senior members that I've had interaction with agree on removal of signature campaigns.

So horrible that you wear one? You ever think that you are suffering from that bias where like minds flock together.

Spam has decreased and would decrease more with another bump to full member in the cut off. If all signatures implemented such a standard we would not be attacking signatures for spam. Lets look at the real issue being ineffective signature mods,that is the issue and not the actual members. You correct one the other falls in line.
Elimination is short sighted because these same senior members you point to for opinion are they posting anything relevant to help bitcoin community? Hunting spammers,scammers and shilling should not count towards contributing to the forum.

Lets keep the moderating unbiased,you carry more weight than you think and its a shame you use it in this manner.

[Jammalan the Prophet]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1274316.0;all seems like sig ad post count bumping galore.

I wonder what they are talking about in there...

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Err... and to think you are also into signature campaigns... beats me

I don't post unintelligible garbage.  And judging by your post here,  you're leaning toward that quality of shitposting.  Heavily. Also, you might want to learn how to quote correctly and not leave a proverbial shit stain upon our common commode here.  Check your work.