Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2018, 06:52:15 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Do you consider IR pictures of miners important for reviews? Would you consider donating towards one?
Yes important, Yes donate - 1 (14.3%)
Yes important, No donate - 2 (28.6%)
Not important, Yes donate - 0 (0%)
Not important, No donate - 4 (57.1%)
Total Voters: 7

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Dogie's Comprehensive... Do you want an IR camera? <---- Please vote!  (Read 647 times)
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2014, 01:35:25 PM
 #1

Hello all,

Would you consider an IR camera a worthy investment for miner reviews?
They produce pictures like this, but are very, very expensive. A camera of this resolution would have cost likely $40,000.



A more reasonable camera ($5000-8000) would produce images like this. I could then tile several to create a larger picture, although they would use different scales.



This is more investment then I could personally put in, so the additional question is would you be willing to contribute to such an investment?

1531767135
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531767135

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531767135
Reply with quote  #2

1531767135
Report to moderator
1531767135
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531767135

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531767135
Reply with quote  #2

1531767135
Report to moderator
The World's Betting Exchange

Bet with play money. Win real Bitcoin. 5BTC Prize Fund for World Cup 2018.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531767135
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531767135

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531767135
Reply with quote  #2

1531767135
Report to moderator
1531767135
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531767135

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531767135
Reply with quote  #2

1531767135
Report to moderator
1531767135
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531767135

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531767135
Reply with quote  #2

1531767135
Report to moderator
Xer0
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000


°^°


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 01:44:37 PM
 #2

check out the FLIRone,
needs an iPhone but still cheaper
bit_wizard
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 01:49:13 PM
 #3

No I will not pitch in for a toy you don't need.
Cheers
wpgdeez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 01:56:53 PM
 #4

Do I want an IR camera, yes. Do I want to pay for you to have one, no.
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 01:59:16 PM
 #5

The FLIR One is pretty low resolution.  I'd see if you can find a FLIR E4 (goes for around $1k) that you can still perform the hack on to get higher resolution:
http://hackaday.com/2013/11/04/manufacturer-crippled-flir-e4-thermal-camera-hacked-to-perform-as-high-end-model/

ChuckBuck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 510

Vietnamese translator - https://goo.gl/Muc9xi


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2014, 02:10:10 PM
 #6

Though it looks cool as shit, I think your reviews can do without it.

                  ██████
                ██████████
             ████████████████
          ██████          ██████
       ██████                ██████
 ██████████                      █████████
 ██████                            ██████
 ██████                             ██████
  ███        █ █                     ███
  ███    ██████████  ████████████    ███
  ███     ████  ████ ███ ████ ███    ███
  ███     ████   ████    ████        ███
  ███     ████   ████    ████        ███
  ███     ████  ████     ████        ███
  ███    ██████████    ████████      ███
  ███        █ █                     ███
 █████                              █████
 ██████                            ██████
 █████████                      █████████
       ██████                ██████
          ██████          ██████
             ████████████████
                ██████████
                  ██████

[]
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
LINKEDIN

YOUTUBE
BITCOINTALK
REDDIT
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 02:24:03 PM
 #7

Though it looks cool as shit, I think your reviews can do without it.
I agree, though mostly because there's not really all that much added value in it from a technical viewpoint; designers already know this information and try to optimize it, choose cooling solutions, etc., while for end-users there's not all that much to it given that the design is essentially finalized and most people would at best consider swapping out fans or dropping heatsinks on/under the usual suspects; the hashing chips, the voltage regulators, and if you're unlucky, inductors.

It's still eye candy, though - can't blame Dogie for wanting one Wink

If anybody's curious as to what some miners look at in a thermal imaging view, check out: http://cryptomining-blog.com/?s=thermal

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2014, 02:28:57 PM
 #8

check out the FLIRone,
needs an iPhone but still cheaper

The FLIR One is pretty low resolution.  I'd see if you can find a FLIR E4 (goes for around $1k) that you can still perform the hack on to get higher resolution:
http://hackaday.com/2013/11/04/manufacturer-crippled-flir-e4-thermal-camera-hacked-to-perform-as-high-end-model/

Yeah resolution is pretty low, and all their marketing material was made with much, much more expensive cameras.

Oh wow that E4 hack is a much better deal - if it still works. E4s cost around $1600 in the UK.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!