devthedev
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
|
|
June 11, 2014, 01:50:46 PM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
It would be relatively easy, but I wouldn't expect it until the new forum.
|
|
|
|
jeffersonairplane
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1522
Merit: 1000
www.bitkong.com
|
|
June 11, 2014, 06:05:31 PM |
|
This would be a great idea to implement. I could see this as being very useful.
|
|
|
|
NEM minnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 04:08:40 AM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin. The early versions were open source. They have been reviewed and updated and some are still open source. The concept is solid. As long as it is open source, and vetted, does it really matter where it came from?
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
June 12, 2014, 11:10:06 AM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin. The early versions were open source. They have been reviewed and updated and some are still open source. The concept is solid. As long as it is open source, and vetted, does it really matter where it came from? yea fuck google. They got their evil mitts in everything.
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
Mikez
|
|
June 12, 2014, 11:41:59 AM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin. The early versions were open source. They have been reviewed and updated and some are still open source. The concept is solid. As long as it is open source, and vetted, does it really matter where it came from? yea fuck google. They got their evil mitts in everything. Here, have a fresh mug of...
|
|
|
|
HeroC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 858
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:07:50 PM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
It is planned for the new forum system.
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:58:28 PM |
|
I would really like to see 2FA on this site via Google Authenticator. I am guessing it would be fairly easy for the admin to add.
It is planned for the new forum system. and their evil mitts in here too now
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
joshraban76
|
|
June 13, 2014, 12:31:10 PM |
|
I feel yes, we need it.
Despite it's a community or a forum over here, but there are trading and important PM's for us and so to care about.
At least for me.
|
|
|
|
kuusj98
|
|
June 19, 2014, 01:29:02 PM |
|
I feel yes, we need it.
Despite it's a community or a forum over here, but there are trading and important PM's for us and so to care about.
At least for me.
We need 2 factor, but a good one, like I said on page 1, we need more options than the standard phone code verification, I don't always bring my phone with me.
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
June 30, 2014, 03:57:18 AM |
|
It shouldnt be too hard to implement, and would stop some accounts from being hacked.
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5362
Merit: 13348
|
|
July 09, 2014, 06:20:17 PM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.)
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
Wulfcastle
|
|
July 11, 2014, 02:09:22 AM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) Is there a new forum rolling out soon?
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
July 11, 2014, 02:11:44 AM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) Is there a new forum rolling out soon? In a few years.
|
|
|
|
Wulfcastle
|
|
July 11, 2014, 02:24:48 AM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) Is there a new forum rolling out soon? In a few years. Edited....blonde moment there
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:03:04 AM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) Is there a new forum rolling out soon? In a few years. Edited....blonde moment there Still dont see any edits, but 2fa might be added to the current forum system. There is a 2BTC bounty for it.
|
|
|
|
Mikez
|
|
July 11, 2014, 11:47:46 PM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) Finally, a confirmation on 2FA, this is awesome(thanks theymos). But the possibility of it being implemented on the current forum software makes me wonder about just how long will take for the new forum software to roll out.
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
July 12, 2014, 01:07:52 AM |
|
I would really like to not see google products used on an anonymous coin.
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.) fuck google.
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
August 08, 2014, 08:41:18 PM |
|
Google Authenticator uses a standard protocol for 2FA. Neither the server nor the client needs to communicate with Google for Google Authenticator to work. This will definitely be supported in the new forum. (And maybe also added to the current forum.)
Thanks for notifying about adding the option. Adding to the current forum will be better as the new forum will take some months. Making 2FA a must for all would be better from hacking a but adding option would be helpful for persons who don't have android or iOS. Kindly, MZ
|
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
September 26, 2014, 09:25:14 AM |
|
theymos hasn't responded here for a few days. We will know after he respond. But I don't whether he will use this instead of Google Authenticator. Is there any other site, which uses this 2FA? AND HOW does this work, if only public Bitcoin address is needed? ~~MZ~~
|
|
|
|
|