Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 12:34:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Any Bitcoin exchanges uses "segregated" accounts?  (Read 858 times)
bitcool (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441
Merit: 1000

Live and enjoy experiments


View Profile
February 04, 2012, 05:07:39 AM
 #1

This question just crossed my mind:

The exchanges make money from trading commission, not by lending out customer fund, right? they are not fractional reserve banks, correct?

Then why can't them keep each customer's fund with the same address?  A customer's account balance will always match balance of that address, giving them confidence knowing the fund is there -- Mybitcoin and MFGlobal fiasco should make everyone nervous.

Does any exchange actually do this??
1715344457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715344457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715344457
Reply with quote  #2

1715344457
Report to moderator
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1226


Away on an extended break


View Profile
February 04, 2012, 05:14:06 AM
 #2

This question just crossed my mind:

The exchanges make money from trading commission, not by lending out customer fund, right? they are not fractional reserve banks, correct?

Then why can't them keep each customer's fund with the same address?  A customer's account balance will always match balance of that address, giving them confidence knowing the fund is there -- Mybitcoin and MFGlobal fiasco should make everyone nervous.

Does any exchange actually do this??
Most exchanges take a huge chunk of their btc offline in paper wallets. Hence it wouldn't be pretty if they have to generate like one address for each person and take it offline at once. Plus using a new address for each transaction enables the exchange to determine exactly how many bitcoins are deposited per transaction.
ForceField
aka Vitaliy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 386
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 04, 2012, 05:18:34 AM
 #3

Keeping all BTC in one address would also remove the added anonymity of a diversified wallet.

PC Hardware & Electronics For BTC     Traded w/: Kansattica | jduck1987 | shakaru | newdude | nitetrader | midievil | blo8i | mb300sd | juggalodarkclow | Garr255 | Tril | Ringmasta | SysRun | CrazyBlane | sokay | BCB | str4wm4n | PinkBatman | Bitobsessed | matauc12 | antimattercrusader | BryanK
bitcool (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441
Merit: 1000

Live and enjoy experiments


View Profile
February 04, 2012, 05:30:05 AM
 #4

Most exchanges take a huge chunk of their btc offline in paper wallets. Hence it wouldn't be pretty if they have to generate like one address for each person and take it offline at once. Plus using a new address for each transaction enables the exchange to determine exactly how many bitcoins are deposited per transaction.
Not sure about the paper wallet thing, but I do believe some exchange do assign a receiving address per account, not per transaction. The fund does got transferred elsewhere later.
Receiving fund doesn't require wallet file to be online, sending fund does, but as long as the withdrawal process is automated, it means the money has to come from some online wallet. If you can secure one address, you probably can secure many.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!