Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 07:59:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: TrueCrypt NOT Secure (or) Truecrypt.org Hacked...  (Read 7121 times)
RUEHL (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 11:36:00 PM
Last edit: May 28, 2014, 11:52:35 PM by RUEHL
 #1

Weird stuff going on at truecrypt.org, I've been using it over the past decade to protect all my files including all my Bitcoins.

“TrueCrypt is not secure,” official SourceForge page abruptly warns



Donate BTC: 1FzpMgR34pJbEqtiMEujRiidoL7PgGPaUH
1715241589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715241589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715241589
Reply with quote  #2

1715241589
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715241589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715241589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715241589
Reply with quote  #2

1715241589
Report to moderator
1715241589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715241589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715241589
Reply with quote  #2

1715241589
Report to moderator
1715241589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715241589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715241589
Reply with quote  #2

1715241589
Report to moderator
audereyy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 25


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:29:57 AM
 #2

Lol, it's NSA nubs trying to catch their 'fish', they think that someone who they are watching, will read this and install bitlocker and they will decrypt his data.
Because they tired of waiting until they can crack TrueCrypt and started to feel powerless, since TrueCrypt isn't really crackable.

NSA =  Embarrassed
TC users =  Grin
ShameOnYou
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:39:44 AM
 #3

This is the third time I've seen mention of this, but to be honest, I'm not sure what the situation is exactly. Could someone explain it to me in layman's terms? Smiley
RUEHL (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:54:13 AM
 #4

This is the third time I've seen mention of this, but to be honest, I'm not sure what the situation is exactly. Could someone explain it to me in layman's terms? Smiley
TrueCrypt has been the de facto standard for open source drive encryption. 

Other paid solutions, it's probable that the vendor or NSA has some backdoor into the encryption.

So all this time, we thought we were safe but perhaps not?


Donate BTC: 1FzpMgR34pJbEqtiMEujRiidoL7PgGPaUH
Singlebyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:58:04 AM
 #5

This is definitely weird.  I googled it to find out more info and this is what PC World had to say:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2241300/truecrypt-now-encouraging-users-to-use-microsofts-bitlocker.html
sippsnapp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 01:21:31 AM
 #6

Twitter goes bonkers on #truecrypt.

No statement from any dev as of yet.

Snowden allegedly used truecrypt and its very well known as nr1 encryption for bitcoiners too.

And then theres this, https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/03/20/inside-nsa-secret-efforts-hunt-hack-system-administrators/

One blog to watch, eventually https://www.schneier.com/about.html

Very strange to say the least.

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm
Singlebyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 01:33:27 AM
 #7

Google news is starting to light up with articles now about it.  This one is sorta interesting:

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/05/28/true-mystery-of-the-disappearing-truecrypt-disk-encryption-software/
eXch
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 582


View Profile WWW
May 29, 2014, 01:51:13 AM
Last edit: May 29, 2014, 03:09:58 AM by eXch.cc
 #8

Don't listen to rumors spreaded by the NSA Smiley
I am quite sure that TrueCrypt developer was paid OR silently arrested by the NSA then they had modified the official site.
TrueCrypt is using a proven open techniques, nobody can crack Serpent+Aes combinations, so stopping using TC just because they "had stopped a developing" would be stupid, as well as because TC hadn't any official releases during a long time period, because it's secure and stable!

Also, look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Truecrypt-end
Who would be trying to modify the official wiki page so steadily and stressfully (3 times) ? Suddenly... And in a so dirty way...
... Only a hacker or the government!!!

"[...] Note: even though it originally came from an acronym, Tor is not spelled "TOR". Only the first letter is capitalized. In fact, we can usually spot people who haven't read any of our website (and have instead learned everything they know about Tor from news articles) by the fact that they spell it wrong."
 -- https://support.torproject.org/about/why-is-it-called-tor
lilfiend
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 02:25:37 AM
 #9

Had to double check my truecrypt version to be sure... 7.1a

PHEW!

[Insert E-peen here]
bluefirecorp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 03:14:03 AM
 #10

Sitting in #truecrypt on freenode. Topic is: Unofficial TrueCrypt channel | Site is potentially compromised so please excercise due diligence before downloading and installing | For now, we don't know any more than you do.


validium
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250

Decentralized thinking


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 07:22:36 AM
 #11

I wouldn't trust this sort of news till i see a post by Bruce schneier on the matter. Now why would the devs tell us to switch to bitlocker which is not open source? Doesn't make sense.

MiningBuddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 927
Merit: 1000


฿itcoin ฿itcoin ฿itcoin


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:07:22 AM
 #12

Some interesting theories on reddit right now about this: http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/26pz9b/truecrypt_development_has_ended_052814/

bitbouillion
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 05:04:58 PM
 #13

Where can I downlaod the 7.2 sources and diff them to 7.1?

Singlebyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 08:16:14 PM
 #14

Why do we have two threads?  Maybe a mod can merge or close one?
lyth0s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


World Class Cryptonaire


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 08:32:03 PM
 #15

I think by them saying to switch to Microsofts bitlocker (LOL) is a red flag for all of us. Truecrypt's devs would never say that. I think this is somewhat of a Warrent Canary to let us know that either the NSA has seized control of the project and to not trust any new updates, or that the developer has been arrested or ordered to implement a backdoor. I would continue to use Truecrypt 7.1a or earlier and NOT use 7.2 or any new version. And DONT use bitlocker, Microsoft has partnered with the NSA many times and I'd bet $$ that there is a NSA backdoor in there for sure.

Monero - Truly Anonymous Digital Cash. Bitcoin Reading List 2017
PrivacyIsImportant
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 24


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 09:22:13 PM
Last edit: November 24, 2018, 06:57:11 PM by PrivacyIsImportant
 #16

Where can I downlaod the 7.2 sources and diff them to 7.1?


http://cyberside.net.ee/truecrypt/ - sources + release mirror

There is also an official github channel, but there is a risk of it being sliced and source code modified as well as official pages.
https://github.com/DrWhax/truecrypt-archive

So, better use old mirrors above, not located in the U.S.
drrussellshane
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 09:30:43 PM
 #17

7.2 was just recently added in the wake of all this so that users could decrypt, but not encrypt files.

I would stay the hell away from it though.

If you didn't download 7.2 within the past day or so, then you don't have it.

7.1a has been around since before the Snowden leaks went public.

Buy a TREZOR! Premier BTC hardware wallet. If you're reading this, you should probably buy one if you don't already have one. You'll thank me later.
InwardContour
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 260


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 10:46:07 PM
 #18

freaky. people have depended on truecrypt for so many years now -- unbelievable if unsecure. Undecided
PrivacyIsImportant
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 24


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:59:42 PM
 #19

unbelievable is how people who have depended on TC simply believe in that and get tricked
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011

Reverse engineer from time to time


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 12:51:39 AM
 #20

If people depended on it for so many years, how come I only recently heard of it?

BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!