Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 05:58:45 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you think an anonymous dev is a good thing?  (Read 399 times)
Bizmark13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


WikiScams.org - Information about Bitcoin Scams


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 10:59:40 AM
 #1

The creator behind Bitcoin is obviously anonymous/pseudonymous. Nobody knows who Satoshi really is. Some may argue that this is a good thing, others might see it as a bad thing.

The creator of Peercoin and Primecoin (Sunny King) is also anonymous. Same goes for Auroracoin and the mysterious devs behind Bytecoin/Cryptonote technology.

Then you have non-anonymous devs like Charlie Lee who developed Litecoin.

So do you think having an anonymous/pseudonymous developer is a plus or a minus for a cryptocurrency?
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on sites such as blockchain.info and brainwallet.org. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508695125
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508695125

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508695125
Reply with quote  #2

1508695125
Report to moderator
Stealthcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:01:53 AM
 #2

Just because Bitcoin is successful and the dev is anonymouse doesn't mean it is good for a coin you can see this as a evidence from all the cryptocoins.
Bizmark13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


WikiScams.org - Information about Bitcoin Scams


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 11:09:43 AM
 #3

Just because Bitcoin is successful and the dev is anonymouse doesn't mean it is good for a coin you can see this as a evidence from all the cryptocoins.

I'm not sure if there is a relationship between having an anonymous developer and the success of a coin. Taking a look at the most popular coins: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Peercoin, and Dogecoin. Of these, the creators of Litecoin and Dogecoin are publically known while the creators of Bitcoin and Peercoin are pseudonymous.
Snail2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 03:00:29 PM
 #4

The anonymity of the devs doesn't really matter until they keep supporting their brainchild and they are not scamming.
boymilk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 03:13:11 PM
 #5

The code can (and should) speak for itself. It's all open source so who cares who wrote it. If the original dev calls it quits, then other people will surely pick it up.
Bizmark13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


WikiScams.org - Information about Bitcoin Scams


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 03:17:34 PM
 #6

The code can (and should) speak for itself. It's all open source so who cares who wrote it. If the original dev calls it quits, then other people will surely pick it up.

True.

Also I see anonymous developers as a safety measure against coercion, extortion, etc.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!