Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 12:53:32 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Antminer S1 Efficiency Question  (Read 594 times)
Reckman (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 02:17:22 PM
 #1

Quick question and I will lock / close this, didn't see it anywhere

What is the highest GH/Watt that the S1 can do? Total GH and Power Consumption?
ravin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 02:28:55 PM
 #2

From the mining rig showoff thread

Unit is overclocked to 393.75 and with the cheapie power supplies, draws just a little over 470W when hot.  Draws 460W when cool.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
May 31, 2014, 05:38:43 PM
 #3

That's not what he asked. Usual terminology is W/GH, which is up to 1.2 or so if you downclock them loads.

ravin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 07:26:02 PM
 #4

That's not what he asked. Usual terminology is W/GH, which is up to 1.2 or so if you downclock them loads.

Alrighty. I thought 393.95/470 = 0.84GH/W is what he was looking for.
grn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 357
Merit: 252


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 07:36:31 PM
 #5

1w/gh is possible

How is that Lexical analysis working out bickneleski?
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 09:25:32 PM
 #6

That's not what he asked. Usual terminology is W/GH, which is up to 1.2 or so if you downclock them loads.

Alrighty. I thought 393.95/470 = 0.84GH/W is what he was looking for.

The '393.95' in your reply is probably the clock speed in MHz, this is not the hash rate (which is about 200 GH/s for that clock speed).
So the efficiency is 470/200 W/(GH/s) which is 2.35 W/(GH/s), a rather poor value.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!