TrueCrypt development ended - now insecure?

[r3wt]

7.1 is still on all of my boxes. Has anyone audited the source?

http://istruecryptauditedyet.com/

wow, there really is a domain for everything these days.

[Equality 7-2521]

And we're back - http://truecrypt.ch/

[BCwinning]

And we're back - http://truecrypt.ch/

back to scamming? don't trust this url folks..

[Equality 7-2521]

And we're back - http://truecrypt.ch/

back to scamming? don't trust this url folks..

Excuse us? What are you talking about? The URL we posted is a link to a project to revive Truecrypt which we read about here earlier - http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameslyne/2014/06/02/truecrypt-is-back-but-should-it-be/

[BCwinning]

And we're back - http://truecrypt.ch/

back to scamming? don't trust this url folks..

Excuse us? What are you talking about? The URL we posted is a link to a project to revive Truecrypt which we read about here earlier - http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameslyne/2014/06/02/truecrypt-is-back-but-should-it-be/

yea 3 posts and truecrypt is hosted on sourceforge. The whole new domain .ch ain't buying it..

[Equality 7-2521]

And we're back - http://truecrypt.ch/

back to scamming? don't trust this url folks..

Excuse us? What are you talking about? The URL we posted is a link to a project to revive Truecrypt which we read about here earlier - http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameslyne/2014/06/02/truecrypt-is-back-but-should-it-be/

yea 3 posts and truecrypt is hosted on sourceforge. The whole new domain .ch ain't buying it..

This is our last post directly to you. Our post count is irrelevant. Feel free to follow the Forbes link. This is a new team of devs attempting to revive Truecrypt or a new product inspired by Truecrypt so why would it matter what the domain is? There is more to the internet than .com and .org.

Thank you.

[dooglus]

A user on reddit has an interesting interpretation of the truecrypt announcement:

Read between the lines? "WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is (n)ot (s)ecure (a)s it may contain unfixed security issues,"
"TrueCrypt is nsa it may contain unfixed security issues".

Oh wow!  I hadn't noticed that!

[Thylacine]

A user on reddit has an interesting interpretation of the truecrypt announcement:

Read between the lines? "WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is (n)ot (s)ecure (a)s it may contain unfixed security issues,"
"TrueCrypt is nsa it may contain unfixed security issues".

Oh wow!  I hadn't noticed that!

I'm all for some of these great theories, but on the other hand, humans excel at seeing patterns where there are none. If randoms on the internet can take the first letters of three words in a sentence and make NSA out of it - then so can the NSA - and any legal binding they had to non disclosure would be forfeit right?

If the developers are somewhat anonymous - do we even know they're from the USA? It would seem a no-brainer to host software like this on some Scandinavian / Caribbean data-haven server right?