splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:12:56 PM |
|
Hi. I'm trying to mine on two brand new Gigabyte 7970s, OC version. Diablominer gives me about 30mh/s per card. CGminer gives me about 550 mh/s per card, but one of the cards gets really hot (above 90C). The other stays around 65C. I tried removing the OK card and using just the HOT one. Same thing - goes above 90C. I tried messing with Intensity in CGminer, it worked, but I lost about 200 mh/s. Then I tried mining with Diablominer and the HOT card worked fine, with temperatures around 65C. But again I get only 30 mh/s. Please help me, because I cannot post anywhere else on this forum. Thanks very much! Nik
|
|
|
|
matthewh3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:14:40 PM |
|
Have you tried the 'hashkill' miner program?
|
|
|
|
splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:17:12 PM |
|
Sorry, forgot to mention I'm running Windows. I don't think there's a windows version of "hashkill".
|
|
|
|
bangra
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:20:11 PM |
|
What do you have controlling the fans on the card? whats the airflow like in the case?
Diablo seems to be the best miner for 79xx series cards at the moment but im not yet running any 79xx's so not sure
|
|
|
|
der_meister
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:22:54 PM |
|
I had read before that phoenix miner with DiaKGCN kernel also gives good results - around 620Mhs/s @ 1050MHz. About overheating - try to undervolt the gpu, if you can.
|
Moving on is a simple thing, what it leaves behind is hard...
|
|
|
splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 01:25:38 PM |
|
The fans are controlled by Catalyst Overdrive. Fan speed is 100% when mining with CGminer. I also read that Diablominer is best for 79xx but it seems it doesn't work for me. With the two 7970s I get only 60 mh/s. The case is open, airflow is fine, room temperature is low. Isn't it weird that one of the cards stays cool, and the other gets hot?
|
|
|
|
jake262144
|
|
February 16, 2012, 02:22:17 PM |
|
The case is open, airflow is fine, room temperature is low. Isn't it weird that one of the cards stays cool, and the other gets hot?
Without some fans, a case with the side panel removed would imply that the airflow is nowhere near fine. You need far more than just convection to move the air around. Hate to break your heart but cheap PC cases suck dicks when mining comes into play. At the very least you should point two 120mm fans at those cards, e.g. one on the side panel (the more fannage the side panel can house the better) and one blowing from the front panel or from the bottom. Also, you need as much exhaust fan-power to make sure the hot air can be removed from the case double-quick.
|
|
|
|
splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 02:35:13 PM |
|
OK, I agree. But airflow is not the reason for this problem. I tried the cards one by one. And the HOT card, even with the other removed from the case, still reaches temperature around 90C. By the way, I tried DiaKGCN kernel for Phoenix miner. It gives about the same hashrates as CGminer. But I have the same temperature problem even with Phoenix miner. ((((
|
|
|
|
jake262144
|
|
February 16, 2012, 02:44:08 PM |
|
Bummer.
Can you check the core voltages? The hotter card may use a lower quality GPU core requiring higher voltage to achieve the same clock as the other card.
If the voltages are exactly the same and the cards are the same make and model, the cooler may make poor contact with the GPU core as a result of manufacturing boo-boo. Unfortunately, you'll likely void your warranty the moment you start messing with the cooler.
Who's the manufacturer of those two cards?
|
|
|
|
splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 03:02:35 PM |
|
Both are Gigabyte R797OC. I just bought them yesterday.
Here's what GPU-Z shows when I mine with both at the same time:
OK card 12 V 11.69 VDDC 1.029 MVDDC 1.602 HOT card 12 V 11.88 VDDC 1.068 MVDDC 1.602
I don't know if that's good or not.
|
|
|
|
der_meister
|
|
February 16, 2012, 03:24:08 PM |
|
The hotter card has higher gpu voltage - VDDC 1.068. Try to lower it. Usually cards can mine at lower voltage than defaults. If you play games you must get it back to 1.068, but for mining I think these cards will run ok even under 1 volt. Just set lower and lower voltage until the cards begin to crash, then go back one level up and all should be ok. For example my 5770 defaults are 850mhz@1.125 v, but mine like a charm at 930mhz@1.075. The electricity bill is smaller and temperatures are great
|
Moving on is a simple thing, what it leaves behind is hard...
|
|
|
jake262144
|
|
February 16, 2012, 03:34:47 PM |
|
The hotter card has higher gpu voltage - VDDC 1.068.
Precisely. OP, there's nothing you can do about the GPU core quality. You can only try to drop the voltage manually, e.g. using cgminer, afterburner, or trixx. Try to take the vddc downto 1.050V, then if it's still stable further down to 1.040, 1.030,... Power consumption, and hence temperature, drops proportionally to voltage reduction squared - every milivolt helps. By all means, you can try undervolting the second GPU too - you can't break it this way and may be able to drop the power usage by a nice margin. Make sure to drop memory clocks as low as they'll go - you don't need fast memory for mining and the temperature drop can be significant when going from factory 1375 to 880 MHz.
|
|
|
|
portron
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
February 16, 2012, 03:35:57 PM |
|
This style of fan design is not optimal for being in a case with multiple GPU's. It spews hot air all over, and if you have more then one of them in the case, they get HOT. The "OC" version is already clocked to 1000mhz, to achieve this I'm assuming the voltage was upped slightly to achieve a stable result. Drop your memory clocks, undervolt your card, get a delta fan pointing directly at both of the cards and fans sucking the hot air out too. If that one STILL runs hot, I'd just return it. Get a reference design 7970 that blows the hot air out the back. It's not really worth voiding your warranty to replace the thermal paste. I'd be worried about the VRM's with the temps reaching 90c.
|
|
|
|
waterboyserver
|
|
February 20, 2012, 02:58:25 AM |
|
Like the others have already mentioned, this type of card just blows the hot air from the graphics card around your computer case. A reference designed 7970 with a blower fan is quite loud, but gets the job done in displacing the heat produced by the card. Another consideration (which I currently use) is to get a full card waterblock (universal blocks do not cool 7970 mosfets, so the board will crash in minutes at high clocks under load).
|
|
|
|
MajorMiner13
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2012, 03:58:42 PM |
|
Like the others have already mentioned, this type of card just blows the hot air from the graphics card around your computer case. A reference designed 7970 with a blower fan is quite loud, but gets the job done in displacing the heat produced by the card. Another consideration (which I currently use) is to get a full card waterblock (universal blocks do not cool 7970 mosfets, so the board will crash in minutes at high clocks under load).
I agree, but this doesn't seem to account for the problem the OP is having. Placing each card individually in his rig still results in one card running at much higher temps than the other. I would avoid this design from the start. Apparently since they aren't reference, they also change the voltages as they please to achieve their meager overclock. In my experience, reference design is always a superior solution.
|
|
|
|
splitt (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2012, 04:08:12 PM |
|
Thanks to all for their advice. I just returned it as faulty and am currently waiting for a replacement card withing two weeks. I did a Furmark stress test on both cards separately and it was clear one of them was not OK, so I decided not to take chances with it.
I just hope they improve the miners for the new SDK 2.6, so that 79xx cards mine faster.
|
|
|
|
MajorMiner13
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2012, 04:16:44 PM |
|
I just hope they improve the miners for the new SDK 2.6, so that 79xx cards mine faster.
With the newest cgminer (2.2.7) and the latest AMD drivers (12.2 pre-cert) I'm getting around 668 Mh/s with 1150/150, stock voltages. Temp is 64 degrees with 3000 rpm fan. Reference design.
|
|
|
|
Kettenmonster
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bool eval(bool b){return b ? b==true : b==false;}
|
|
February 23, 2012, 08:02:15 PM |
|
OK card 12 V 11.69 HOT card 12 V 11.88
While you are waiting for replacement, did you check the 12V with just one card?
|
The paining (sic!) is done with the QPainter class inside the paintEvent() method. (source: my internet)
|
|
|
deepceleron
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1036
|
|
February 23, 2012, 10:43:43 PM |
|
The heatsink was likely not mounted correctly on the card that was too hot. If pervasive warranty-voiding anti-tamper stickers were not used, it likely could have been removed and reinstalled with new thermal paste and the problem fixed.
|
|
|
|
|