Nathonas
|
|
June 07, 2014, 08:47:50 PM |
|
This video has been around for ages and yes it is pretty much on the money. Only reason they're not in Iran yet is because they haven't been able to blow the nuclear weapons bulllshit out of proportion, and Iran has actually been very reasonable. They know they can't do the same thing as in Iraq.
|
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 08, 2014, 02:44:58 AM |
|
So, after Syria, Iran will be next? The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans.
|
|
|
|
Pepin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2014, 10:35:31 AM |
|
Didn't you guys watch the new Robocop movie? It shows how the US will pacify Iran with their army of robots. The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans. "Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's.
|
|
|
|
bitsmichel
|
|
June 08, 2014, 10:41:49 AM |
|
Didn't you guys watch the new Robocop movie? It shows how the US will pacify Iran with their army of robots. The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans. "Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's. The problem for US citizens is not about ICBM's (whether they have them or not) but about the general attitude towards the US. The US gov. attitude is pretty much the same if you are in Iran. It kind of reminds me of the Iraq story "The nation possesses weapons of mass destruction and other weapons. And with Armed Forced currently numbering in their millions..."
|
|
|
|
|
bitsmichel
|
|
June 08, 2014, 11:33:54 AM |
|
Didn't you guys watch the new Robocop movie? It shows how the US will pacify Iran with their army of robots. The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans. "Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's. The problem for US citizens is not about ICBM's (whether they have them or not) but about the general attitude towards the US. The US gov. attitude is pretty much the same if you are in Iran. It kind of reminds me of the Iraq story "The nation possesses weapons of mass destruction and other weapons. And with Armed Forced currently numbering in their millions..." A map of states with nuclear weapons https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Nuclear_weapons_states.svg/877px-Nuclear_weapons_states.svg.png Iran is not on the list. Turkey has weapons of mass destruction tho
|
|
|
|
RiverBoatBTC
|
|
June 08, 2014, 12:02:21 PM |
|
Maybe we need to define ICBM for you An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a ballistic missile with a minimum range of more than 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi)[1] primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more nuclear warheads). Similarly conventional, chemical and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target. You are full of twisted fax.....................
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 08, 2014, 01:03:50 PM |
|
Turkey has weapons of mass destruction tho Turkey is just a NATO nuclear weapons sharing state. That means that there are a number of nuclear weapons (around 70) located in its territory, but they are not under the control of the Turkish Armed Forces. Those weapons are located in the Incirlik Air Base, and under the control of the 39th Air Base Wing of the United States Air Force.
|
|
|
|
bitsmichel
|
|
June 08, 2014, 01:40:03 PM |
|
Turkey has weapons of mass destruction tho Turkey is just a NATO nuclear weapons sharing state. That means that there are a number of nuclear weapons (around 70) located in its territory, but they are not under the control of the Turkish Armed Forces. Those weapons are located in the Incirlik Air Base, and under the control of the 39th Air Base Wing of the United States Air Force. /sarcasm
|
|
|
|
JohnnyLightning
|
|
June 08, 2014, 02:48:27 PM |
|
I knew Clark had to be nuts when Madonna endorsed him for president.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 08, 2014, 03:22:46 PM |
|
I knew Clark had to be nuts when Madonna endorsed him for president.
Is the POTUS post reserved only for war criminals? Wesley Clark was one of the masterminds behind the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, where the American jets bombed Serbian orphanages, killing dozens of children. Another war criminal is confirmed as the Democrat candidate for the 2016 election. May be Wes could win the GOP nomination?
|
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 11, 2014, 02:01:20 AM |
|
Situation has become a bit calm in Iraq, with the exception of a few regions. And this is the real cost of the Iraqi invasion.
|
|
|
|
|
Ron~Popeil
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:23:30 AM |
|
I knew Clark had to be nuts when Madonna endorsed him for president.
Is the POTUS post reserved only for war criminals? Wesley Clark was one of the masterminds behind the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, where the American jets bombed Serbian orphanages, killing dozens of children. Another war criminal is confirmed as the Democrat candidate for the 2016 election. May be Wes could win the GOP nomination? He was a committed neocon before it was cool.
|
|
|
|
|
niothor
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:14:17 PM |
|
Read a few articles from that blog and you'll soon understand why they are over estimating and claiming others are underestimating the number of deaths. It's another blog with biased information like info wars. But of course , like an us hater , you should be comfortable with those.
|
|
|
|
Benjig
|
|
June 12, 2014, 10:53:19 PM |
|
USA in fact is not attacking countries, they are making them to fight eachother, or causing civil wars.. so they dont need to waste soldiers
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:38:26 AM |
|
USA in fact is not attacking countries, they are making them to fight eachother, or causing civil wars.. so they dont need to waste soldiers If the US does not send its troops, then who will guard all those oil wells and gas rigs, most of which are now owned by the American corporations? Anyway that is the #1 priority for the American government.
|
|
|
|
|
|