Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 07:56:50 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: It's already 48%, No one care about Ghash?  (Read 5181 times)
Stevenrm87
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 01:26:09 AM
 #81

ghash is a colossal threat .. the community should NEVER allow a mining pool this kind of power.  News of a 51% attack would DESTROY Bitcoin by undermining our confidence in it. 

Now you see why having only 1 bloackchain will not be acceptable. Having a backup suck as Litecoin or Peercoin are here for these very reasons and why they will continue to grow and gain marketshare

Selling fully funded Titan BTC Physical Bitcoins, Gold and SIlver - BTC Physical Bitcoins BTC PM if interested.
Hippie Tech
aka Amenstop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001


All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2014, 03:20:20 AM
 #82

We know the 51% magic number..  But what about the coins ?

How easy would such an attack be to carry out if you had 200,000 BTC to compliment the hashpower ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=650311.0

jztxeno
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 05:57:30 PM
 #83

Time will tell.
NEM minnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 06:09:20 PM
 #84

It was sooooooo weak that a hardware manufacture had to resolve this instead of the pool itself.  It really makes me have a lot less faith in bitcoin.  The pool should have just made a very small fee instead of charging 0.  That would have naturally reduced the share.  Instead the pool operators just kept on going.  Soooooo sad.
TheTruth4
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:57:35 AM
 #85

MORE p2pools and less idiots buying mining contracts that do not pay off.
bananahunter67
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 265


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2014, 09:07:45 AM
 #86

Satoshi didn't plan the birth of pool when he projected bitcoin with the 51% attack possibility.

Cryptostats.es
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 09:18:44 AM
 #87

Satoshi didn't plan the birth of pool when he projected bitcoin with the 51% attack possibility.

i think he thought about it, but he couldn't find a good solution
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2014, 09:58:56 AM
 #88

Ghas.IO working on "mining decentralization solution"

http://imgur.com/3IInTSR


but in the long run we have to find a solution that this is impossible do to or at least much much harder.

eid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 10:34:26 AM
 #89

So now ghash.io control 50% of the network, but they've turned off/hidden some of it so it looks better on a graph?

This doesn't inspire confidence.
Mikez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 10:40:35 AM
 #90

I am amazed by the numer of ignorant greedy newbs who say that they don't give a shit.

I think we should at least consider the fact that perhaps the large number of 'ignorant greedy newbs' might actually be a significant smaller group, with a nefarious agenda.

/paranoia off.

Harley997
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 05:01:46 PM
 #91

So now ghash.io control 50% of the network, but they've turned off/hidden some of it so it looks better on a graph?

This doesn't inspire confidence.

BitFury actually pulled several PH/s of their mining capacity from Ghash and directed it towards other pools.

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
BetMoose
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 372
Merit: 250

Real Bets. Real People. By Anyone, on anything


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2014, 06:55:35 PM
 #92

Ghas.IO working on "mining decentralization solution"

http://imgur.com/3IInTSR


but in the long run we have to find a solution that this is impossible do to or at least much much harder.

Their support doesn't even sound like native english speakers - which is fine actually, but anyway it's not reassuring, I don't think they CAN 'decentralize' it without losing control of their miners lol.. Pointing their hardware at a different pool doesn't change the fact they have CONTROL at any time to do a 51% attack.... =\

We just need a better mining model tbh..

BetMoose.com - Wager on real world events. Profit from predicting the future. Create and share your own contracts.
cdog
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 09:18:09 PM
 #93

Something like, oh I dont know, proof of stake, or vertcoin? This problem isnt new, and it isnt going away. I think its not just an issue, it is THE issue...

Herein lies the catch 22 with ASIC mining:

Initially, ASIC mining makes the network exponentially more secure. But in the end, ASIC mining will make the network MUCH LESS secure.
TookDk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1062


One coin to rule them all


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2014, 10:34:19 PM
 #94

Satoshi didn't plan the birth of pool when he projected bitcoin with the 51% attack possibility.

i think he thought about it, but he couldn't find a good solution

He properly assumed that the miners would use their brains when selecting their pool.

Cryptography is one of the few things you can truly trust.
bananas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 257


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 10:38:49 PM
 #95

i sold 51% of my bitcoins, not kidding
FlowerMatt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 16, 2014, 03:32:00 AM
 #96

WTF, why are miners so clueless?

gigalew
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 16, 2014, 03:38:14 AM
 #97

This is a flaw in bitcoin itself. CEX.IO today.........China, Russia, USA tomorrow.
Ikaros
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2014, 05:02:47 AM
 #98

Why everybody talk about 51 %? 50.00001 % is not enough?
TookDk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1062


One coin to rule them all


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2014, 06:31:22 AM
 #99

Why everybody talk about 51 %? 50.00001 % is not enough?

The term 51% is "hype" word, actually 40% would be enough to make serious trouble.

Cryptography is one of the few things you can truly trust.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2014, 06:42:29 AM
 #100

Why everybody talk about 51 %? 50.00001 % is not enough?

The term 51% is "hype" word, actually 40% would be enough to make serious trouble.
You mean 40% is enough to get past some confirmations with a decent success rate?
51% is like doomsday for bitcoin though.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!