Bitcoin Forum
June 18, 2019, 09:50:26 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][Groestl/MyriadGroestl] Pool closed  (Read 36623 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 01:22:32 AM
 #81

> On optimized kernel I got 15.7 Mh/s, but the problem is my hashrate wasn't shown on the pool and I wasn't getting any coins  Huh (I was mining ATH on suprnova pool)

Optimized only works with cryptohunger.com pool.
On other pools you'll be getting HW errors and 0 shares accepted.

1560851426
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560851426

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560851426
Reply with quote  #2

1560851426
Report to moderator
1560851426
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560851426

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560851426
Reply with quote  #2

1560851426
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560851426
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560851426

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560851426
Reply with quote  #2

1560851426
Report to moderator
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 03:58:47 AM
 #82

Payouts have been changed to every hour.

You will receive a payment if you earned 1 ATH, 1 GRS, 1 DOKDO or 0.01 DMD.

If you have just started mining, please wait for 2-3 hours until your hourly earnings stabilize (because it usually takes 120-150 confirmations for a mined block, which is 2 - 2 and a half hours).

Once you've mined for 3 hours after starting on this pool for the 1st time, you should be getting roughly 1/24 of your daily income every hour.

Let me know if that is too far from truth.

Use http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency or http://whatmine.com/ to calculate your average income.

Thanks!
paladin281978
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 25, 2014, 04:42:19 AM
 #83


srcxxx

there are plans to improve miner for Qubit or Skein? example coin myriad

srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 05:53:58 AM
 #84

there are plans to improve miner for Qubit or Skein? example coin myriad

Next is myriad-coin.

Also, some improvement to the current Groestl algo.

And a multi-pool.
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 06:01:16 AM
 #85

Version 1.2.5 (third release, 25 June 2014)
* Windows build
* Added R9 290 optimized Kernel for Tahiti, Pitcairn and Hawaii GPUs
* Shows a warning if "optimized" kernel is used with incorrect pool



Sapphire R9 290 TriX, Sapphire R9 290 TriX, Gigabyte R9 270X
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 07:19:07 AM
 #86

Version 1.2.5 (third release, 25 June 2014)
* Windows build
* Added R9 290 optimized Kernel for Tahiti, Pitcairn and Hawaii GPUs
* Shows a warning if "optimized" kernel is used with incorrect pool



Sapphire R9 290 TriX, Sapphire R9 290 TriX, Gigabyte R9 270X

I have a question regarding those "incredible" hasrate increases though. I've set up an account at cryptohunger in order to test the new optimized kernel but noticed that the pool is not exclusively a DMD pool and all references are in GRS. It doesn't seem I am mining DMD in there although I've provided a DMD address. I suppose your pool is a multi groestlcoin pool. My question relates to whether the increased hashrate in cryptohunger pool with the optimized kernel would be equivalent if I was able to use that optimized kernel with say Danbi's pool?

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 07:36:53 AM
 #87

I have a question regarding those "incredible" hasrate increases though. I've set up an account at cryptohunger in order to test the new optimized kernel but noticed that the pool is not exclusively a DMD pool and all references are in GRS. It doesn't seem I am mining DMD in there although I've provided a DMD address. I suppose your pool is a multi groestlcoin pool. My question relates to whether the increased hashrate in cryptohunger pool with the optimized kernel would be equivalent if I was able to use that optimized kernel with say Danbi's pool?

Hi!

There is no account setup. Did you use grs.cryptohunger.com by any chance? Cause that's different. That's pure Groestlcoin pool and does not supprot optimized kernels.

You need to use cryptohunger.com:50002 and login with you DMD address. There is no account to set up.

As for Groestl references... It's just because I'm also the groestlcoin developer.

And as for the girl... I paid $400 usd for that photoshoot from my own pocket (see http://goo.gl/KE2xfO). So why not use it?
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 07:46:06 AM
Last edit: June 26, 2014, 02:18:42 AM by polanskiman
 #88

I have a question regarding those "incredible" hasrate increases though. I've set up an account at cryptohunger in order to test the new optimized kernel but noticed that the pool is not exclusively a DMD pool and all references are in GRS. It doesn't seem I am mining DMD in there although I've provided a DMD address. I suppose your pool is a multi groestlcoin pool. My question relates to whether the increased hashrate in cryptohunger pool with the optimized kernel would be equivalent if I was able to use that optimized kernel with say Danbi's pool?

Hi!

There is no account setup. Did you use grs.cryptohunger.com by any chance? Cause that's different. That's pure Groestlcoin pool and does not supprot optimized kernels.

You need to use cryptohunger.com:50002 and login with you DMD address. There is no account to set up.

As for Groestl references... It's just because I'm also the groestlcoin developer.

And as for the girl... I paid $400 usd for that photoshoot from my own pocket (see http://goo.gl/KE2xfO). So why not use it?

I created an account at cryptohunger.com  and yes I am using cryptohunger.com:50002 but your answer now makes me realize that it is in fact a P2Pool specially in vue to the fact that the login/user info is a coin address. Is that correct?

Sorry, what girl? Maybe you were answering to some one else. Anyways sweet pictures, sweet girl!! Wink although not sure how that relates to crytography...but who cares. Vitamins for the eyes!

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 07:54:22 AM
 #89

I created an account at cryptohunger.com  and yes I am using cryptohunger.com:50002 but your answer now makes me realize that it is in fact a P2Pool specially in vue to the fact that the login/user info is a coin address. Is that correct?

It's not p2pool, but similar. See here: https://github.com/zone117x/node-open-mining-portal
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 08:11:16 AM
 #90

I created an account at cryptohunger.com  and yes I am using cryptohunger.com:50002 but your answer now makes me realize that it is in fact a P2Pool specially in vue to the fact that the login/user info is a coin address. Is that correct?

It's not p2pool, but similar. See here: https://github.com/zone117x/node-open-mining-portal

Noted with thanks. My question still stands though (regarding hashrate).

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 08:49:26 AM
 #91

Noted with thanks. My question still stands though (regarding hashrate).

If you don't want to mine on cryptohunger.com, you can still use grs-sgminer.
The "groestlcoin" kernel is slower (16.7MH/s or R9 290 vs 20MH/s on optimized kernel), but works with any pool.
grs-sgminer is still faster than sph-sgminer which only gives 14.4 MH/s on R9 290.
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 08:54:55 AM
Last edit: June 25, 2014, 09:22:05 AM by polanskiman
 #92

Noted with thanks. My question still stands though (regarding hashrate).

If you don't want to mine on cryptohunger.com, you can still use grs-sgminer.
The "groestlcoin" kernel is slower (16.7MH/s or R9 290 vs 20MH/s on optimized kernel), but works with any pool.
grs-sgminer is still faster than sph-sgminer which only gives 14.4 MH/s on R9 290.

No it's not that I don't want. I simply want to understand Wink

I am getting this at present with the optimized kernel (1.2.4) on cryptohunger.com:81

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  64.0C 3512RPM | 10.83M/10.95Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.171/m I:22
 GPU 1:  64.0C 3397RPM | 10.80M/10.92Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.241/m I:22
 GPU 2:  65.0C 3473RPM | 10.84M/10.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.176/m I:22
 GPU 3:  63.0C 3327RPM | 10.84M/10.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.211/m I:22

btw I had to rename the .bop file from groestlcoinTahiti256l4.bop to groestlcoinTahiti256l8.bop as I was getting an error at loading where it complained that groestlcoinTahiti256l8.bop could not be found.

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 10:52:06 AM
Last edit: June 25, 2014, 03:37:54 PM by polanskiman
 #93

Managed to push the hashing even further for my 280x cards with the optimized kernel:

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  67.0C 3407RPM | 14.82M/14.96Mh/s | R:  3.0% HW:0 WU:0.257/m I:22
 GPU 1:  68.0C 3339RPM | 14.81M/14.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.260/m I:22
 GPU 2:  68.0C 3459RPM | 14.81M/14.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.286/m I:22
 GPU 3:  67.0C 3135RPM | 14.82M/14.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:1 WU:0.248/m I:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With following config:

Code:
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"_device" : "0,1,2,3",
"intensity" : "22",
"_difficulty-multiplier" : "0.0039062500",
"_rawintensity" : "8191",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"_thread-concurrency" : "0",
"_shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-engine" : "1150,1150,1150,1150",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1500,1500,1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "12",
"_lookup-gap" : "2",
"auto-gpu" : true,
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "0-100",
"temp-cutoff" : "89",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"failover-only" : true,
"_scrypt" : true,
"_vectors" : "1",
"kernel" : "optimized",
"_gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.200,1.200,1.200,1.200",
"_gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"_gpu-platform" : "0",
"_hotplug" : "5",
"_log" : "5",
"_no-pool-disable" : true,
"_queue" : "1",
"_scan-time" : "1",
"_expiry" : "120",
"_shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Note: the underscore prior the parameter means the parameter is ignored and therefore not used.

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
pikuchato
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


Activity: yes


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 02:00:25 PM
 #94

What about the power consumption of the optimized and unoptimized kernels?

Does anyone have some numbers for us? Tongue
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 02:30:24 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2014, 03:47:02 AM by polanskiman
 #95

What about the power consumption of the optimized and unoptimized kernels?

Does anyone have some numbers for us? Tongue

Without modifying any settings except the kernel this is what I get:

Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 695 Watts >> 14.5 Mh per card
Optimized kernel: 4 x 280x = 918 Watts >> 5 Mh per card

This is the total wattage reading from the watt meter at the wall so it also includes the rest (mobo, ram, cpu etc) but what is interesting is the relative difference.

Also note that in order to get the best of the standard kernel I would need to modify certain parameter in order to "optimize" the hashing.

EDIT:

After I optimize parameters with the stantard kernel I get:

Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 790 Watts >> 7.7 Mh per card

EDIT 2:

Noticed I inverted hashing values above. It was supposed to be:

Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 695 Watts >> 5 Mh per card
Optimized kernel: 4 x 280x = 918 Watts >> 14.5 Mh per card

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 02:55:42 PM
 #96


Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 695 Watts >> 14.5 Mh per card
Optimized kernel: 4 x 280x = 918 Watts >> 5 Mh per card

After I optimize parameters with the stantard kernel I get:

Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 790 Watts >> 7.7 Mh per card

Would you mind posting your config for standard kernel Smiley
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:11:17 PM
Last edit: June 25, 2014, 03:37:10 PM by polanskiman
 #97


Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 695 Watts >> 14.5 Mh per card
Optimized kernel: 4 x 280x = 918 Watts >> 5 Mh per card

After I optimize parameters with the stantard kernel I get:

Standard kernel: 4 x 280x = 790 Watts >> 7.7 Mh per card

Would you mind posting your config for standard kernel Smiley

My apologies. It actually seems that the same config for the optimized and standard kernel provide the optimum hashing. However in order to obtain the optimum hashing for the standard kernel I simply needed to switch pools to Danbi's. At cryptohunger's pool the hashing initially seemed to be inferior, that's why I thought I had to reconfigure certain parameters.

You can see my config above. I get equally 790 Watts for the standard kernel on Danbi's pool.

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:42:27 PM
 #98

"gpu-threads" : 4
actually performs better on my 280x and 7950 ....
clocking 280x at 1100/1700
clocking 7950 at 1100/1300
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:46:02 PM
 #99

"gpu-threads" : 4
actually performs better on my 280x and 7950 ....

Tried it. I lose 4 Mh per card.

BTC: 1JnH2HVoWnDubGmrXintsNWEaByGRjY8wL
DMD: dZuojpnwkmzqUegQaFk7ynDY8p7zAmG25H
XCN: CKnXnjXsVJzXgqEEqjsMRRc7ohkk6jHsb6
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:50:52 PM
Last edit: June 25, 2014, 04:12:58 PM by utahjohn
 #100

"gpu-threads" : 4
actually performs better on my 280x and 7950 ....

Tried it. I lose 4 Mh per card.

Interesting Smiley I gain about 500KHs on both cards Smiley
I'm not using pool but am solo mining ...

Here's my config for sgminer 4.1.0-103-g00015 :
"intensity" : "18,20",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,8192",
"shaders" : "2048,1792",
"gpu-threads" : "2,1",
"gpu-engine" : "1100,1100",
"gpu-fan" : "30-100",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-memclock" : "1700,1300",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "64",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "60",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "59",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!