Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 05:41:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: When 50-75 people control 90% of Bitcoin supply, has it ever been decentralized  (Read 891 times)
solid12345 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 07:17:01 PM
 #1

This is the elephant in the room no one likes to discuss, alot is made about ghash gaining control of 51% of the hash rate, but what about the elite few who actually own all the Bitcoins? Are we not equally at their mercy as the big mining pools?
ljudotina
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1029


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 07:26:42 PM
 #2

This is the elephant in the room no one likes to discuss, alot is made about ghash gaining control of 51% of the hash rate, but what about the elite few who actually own all the Bitcoins? Are we not equally at their mercy as the big mining pools?

We are.
They can, if they choose, drop down price to whatever level they want (by selling huge quantities of BTC on open market).
But, doing so would damage "them" more than it would damage "us", so it's kinda self healing / reapiring system. Not many are willing to commit economic suicide "just for funs".

Beliathon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2014, 08:08:53 PM
 #3

This is the elephant in the room no one likes to discuss, alot is made about ghash gaining control of 51% of the hash rate, but what about the elite few who actually own all the Bitcoins? Are we not equally at their mercy as the big mining pools?

We are.
They can, if they choose, drop down price to whatever level they want (by selling huge quantities of BTC on open market).
But, doing so would damage "them" more than it would damage "us", so it's kinda self healing / reapiring system.
Correct, the Bitcoin network is an organic system that, like your body, is always seeking homeostasis. If you think you can hurt it, you are mistaken. You can delay it's development, mostly at your own expense, to the benefit of no one.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Cicero2.0
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

★☆★Bitin.io★☆★


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 08:15:39 PM
 #4

I seriously doubt that large holders would be irrational enough to hurt themselves financially. What would they gain from it? It is their interest that bitcoin does well.

I am sure there are some that would try to manipulate the market by dumping so they can buy at a lower price but that happens in all markets.

Melbustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 08:38:57 PM
 #5

Umm... Where did you get those numbers? (Current thread title is: "When 50-75 people control 90% of Bitcoin supply, has it ever been decentralized".)

Are you just fudding, or are you quoting (or misquoting) some number you heard somewhere?


The thread with the most research on this topic is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0

From that thread:
"100,000 owners with BTC10-BTC2,000 ($5,000-$1,000,000) hold 50% of the bitcoins."

Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
S4VV4S
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 08:45:09 PM
 #6

Umm... Where did you get those numbers? (Current thread title is: "When 50-75 people control 90% of Bitcoin supply, has it ever been decentralized".)

Are you just fudding, or are you quoting (or misquoting) some number you heard somewhere?


The thread with the most research on this topic is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0

From that thread:
"100,000 owners with BTC10-BTC2,000 ($5,000-$1,000,000) hold 50% of the bitcoins."

You are forgetting that Satoshi alone holds around 1.5m BTC.
Where does he fit in?
Willisius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

I'm really quite sane!


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 09:40:36 PM
 #7

Not technically, but in an economical sense, we are "at the mercy," so to speak, of anyone who holds so much. The good news - for holders - is that people are very greedy, so they probably act (with no regulation) in whatever manner they can to drive the value of their investment up. The bad news - for Bitcoin itself - is that its "true" value as a store of wealth is concealed by this behavior.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 09:42:14 PM
 #8

Not technically, but in an economical sense, we are "at the mercy," so to speak, of anyone who holds so much. The good news - for holders - is that people are very greedy, so they probably act (with no regulation) in whatever manner they can to drive the value of their investment up. The bad news - for Bitcoin itself - is that its "true" value as a store of wealth is concealed by this behavior.

it's not just driving the price up. you can make money by speculating and driving it down, then buy them up and push them back to their original value.
SomethingElse
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Looking for the next big thing


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 10:32:17 PM
 #9

That is why I like NEM

NEM
FlowerMatt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 16, 2014, 03:38:11 AM
 #10

If all the structure is made on a good basis it can be decentralized even with their 'contol'

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!