Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 06:14:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Apple, Google, Yahoo, etc.  (Read 967 times)
jubalix (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2014, 05:52:58 AM
 #1


It seems likely Apple, Google and Yahoo have done their sums/due diligence and realised there is nothing they can launch that can compete with BTC. Why?  essentially BTC tech forces you to relinquish control if you are to be trusted. This is antithetical to old corporations system, where State prescribed corporations redistribute profits to shareholders for good organization of capital (not inherently wrong, just not as efficient as it could be). The DAC/BTC model cuts out a lot of the centralized corp structure and lets people join ad hoc or leave. Imagine for a moment that to make money Apple had to give its patents away.

Even if they built a hash farm to take over all they would have is a worthless coins as every forks or uses an algo resistant to their farms tech.


It's the nature of the break though of the byzantie generals problem that basically makes old style 19th/20th centry corps model reduced. This becomes even more compelling with the multisig for contracts etc.


Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist. B.Engineering/B.Laws

https://www.binance.com/?ref=10062065
nxtbabybaby
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 18, 2014, 12:57:19 AM
 #2

DAC/DAPPs/DAS all the way.
Will improve transparency if they choose to use any specific chain to register transations and code them effectively.




It seems likely Apple, Google and Yahoo have done their sums/due diligence and realised there is nothing they can launch that can compete with BTC. Why?  essentially BTC tech forces you to relinquish control if you are to be trusted. This is antithetical to old corporations system, where State prescribed corporations redistribute profits to shareholders for good organization of capital (not inherently wrong, just not as efficient as it could be). The DAC/BTC model cuts out a lot of the centralized corp structure and lets people join ad hoc or leave. Imagine for a moment that to make money Apple had to give its patents away.

Even if they built a hash farm to take over all they would have is a worthless coins as every forks or uses an algo resistant to their farms tech.


It's the nature of the break though of the byzantie generals problem that basically makes old style 19th/20th centry corps model reduced. This becomes even more compelling with the multisig for contracts etc.


TrailingComet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 18, 2014, 01:33:04 AM
 #3

Bitcoin plus Teslas excision to throw open its patent base is over time gonna put pressure on the big boys to reimagine their command and control business models

rext
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 18, 2014, 07:10:35 AM
 #4

don't encourage them lol
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
June 18, 2014, 08:01:51 AM
 #5

Apple & Google (also Facebook) are still a major threat, even if they simply launch their own alt coin. Look at how quickly Chrome browser (for example) went from ~2% market share to much bigger numbers. Yahoo is fighting hard to remain a top site, perhaps they could create a buzz by integrating BTC usage throughout their "empire".

r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 504


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
June 18, 2014, 08:04:30 AM
 #6

Apple & Google (also Facebook) are still a major threat, even if they simply launch their own alt coin. Look at how quickly Chrome browser (for example) went from ~2% market share to much bigger numbers. Yahoo is fighting hard to remain a top site, perhaps they could create a buzz by integrating BTC usage throughout their "empire".

Yahoo is far from irrelevant, as they acquired peercdn and patented their next generation peer2peer cdn technology.

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
zimmah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 18, 2014, 08:56:19 AM
 #7

don't encourage them lol

They aren't completely stupid you know? They won't create their own coin because they realize no one wants centralized Altcoins. Each dollar spend and each hour used to create googlecoin/applecoin/yahoocoin is a dollar or hour wasted. They know that. They will not waste resources on that.
devphp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 18, 2014, 09:18:01 AM
 #8

They aren't completely stupid you know? They won't create their own coin because they realize no one wants centralized Altcoins. Each dollar spend and each hour used to create googlecoin/applecoin/yahoocoin is a dollar or hour wasted. They know that. They will not waste resources on that.

They can issue PoS coins and exchange them for their own shares, that will quickly make their coin widespread enough to compete with others (not centralized), and then it all gains a network effect because they can target millions of users quickly. Not sure if they would be allowed to do it for political reasons, but economically and strategically they can gain a large share of crypto market with their resources within a short time if they would like to.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!