|
Btcrockk (OP)
|
 |
August 26, 2014, 05:12:23 PM |
|
Thanks! I'll discover it. Nice article! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samperio
Member
 Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Picture this: Francisco de Quevedo.
|
|
August 27, 2014, 04:39:02 AM |
|
This has been one of the best faucets I've visited and used, rewarding handsomely for even a couple of hours attention to it. At least up to know, my perception of it is that of a great site. I got paid for my first couple of clicks before the referred delay to Aug 26. It was really quick, and so I got relatively a lot of satoshis for a couple of clicks.
Mind you, it's not that great for the reported problem. Hey, we all learn on the road, as the poem goes, "Se hace camino al andar". All I mean is that hopefully this will be a lesson for all of us working with ad sites. I keep on visiting and look forward to things getting back on track.
Just as we try to build a competitive alternative to the old currency system conducting business with Bitcoin, well, we shall apply the same total quality principles big financial entities (ad companies, etc.) apply to their business. Yes, our business might be small as well as our resources, but if that's what we've got, and as a whole we want to get somewhere with it, we need to keep up to the expectations this new libertarian system puts.
S.
|
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
August 27, 2014, 11:23:29 AM |
|
Can you PM me the details on debt? How many BTC do you want to pay to the users? Reply here or PM me.  ~~MZ~~ |
|
|
|
|
Btcrockk (OP)
|
|
August 27, 2014, 02:09:18 PM |
|
Muhammed Zakir Answered in PM
|
|
|
|
bitcoinlosa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
August 27, 2014, 03:34:53 PM |
|
Hi Btcrockk, why don't allow anybody to put ads on your sites? Like freebitcoin does... I know this can be done with a-ads, but maybe with a more simple system ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Btcrockk (OP)
|
|
August 27, 2014, 04:13:38 PM |
|
already did it, but it's not much as adsense gives.
|
|
|
|
Happycrash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
August 27, 2014, 05:26:06 PM |
|
20 check in and only 270 satoshi, is a bad page now  |
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
August 27, 2014, 08:57:57 PM |
|
in your notice on the check-in faucet, you mentioned how you changed the difficulty so it hits less, for the time being... but...
the way it had appeared up until now, is that you rolled up a random time, compared to current time, and that's how our payout was...
so, if you were making it more difficult, then I would think rolling up numbers up to 99:99:99 would make it more difficult, but I haven't seen a single 'random' time out of range... so...
you were never rolling up a random time, were you? you were putting in a fake 'random' time, to match, or not match, according to whatever method you used to determine a winner and odds of winning...
as much as I liked yer check-in faucet, particularly being different than all the others, this just stinks.
If you're not going to actually roll up a random time and let the chips fall where they may, then why even bother faking it and making it look like you are?
I'd be ok with making it more difficult by rolling up %H, %M and %S, to a larger range we have to match our current time against, just to make it harder, for the time being, but to artificially create a winning/losing time?
Couldn't you have had the same effect leaving the difficulty alone, and just dropping the winning payouts temporarily?
I'm not trying to be a jerk about this, but this does bug me some...
=squeak=
|
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
|
hastalavista
|
|
August 28, 2014, 12:03:59 PM |
|
Здpaвcтвyйтe вce !Xoчy пocтaвить BAc вcex в кypc,вчepa y мeня cняли дeньги в кoличecтвe 100 тыcяч биткoв,и нa кoшeлeк нe пpишли нe кoпeйки.BЫвoды дeлaйтe caми.Я личнo yжe cдeлaл этo чиcтoй вoды ЛOXOTPOH, тyт людeй oбмaнывaют,xoтя пиcaли чтo выплaты бyдyт 26 чиcлa,нo yBЫ мeня пpocтo кинyли.
мoжeт иx нe cняли, a пpocтo "зaмopoзили"? Чтo-тo Baши выcкaзывaния cлишкoм гoлocлoвны. this is the english forum, we do not understand russian, imagine everyone from around the world would use their motherlanguage here...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
micky123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 28, 2014, 01:28:35 PM |
|
BtcRockk, Thank you for your efforts. I knew you wouldn't let us down! I was a bit doubtful though tbh! One small request, i have a referral competition for luckycheckin going on BCT and the winner gets to walk away with 2 GH/s voucher from CEX. I was using the referral statistics link to track the one who plays the most. After the payments, it looks like you have obliterated those statistics. If you can send me statistics for my referrals by PM or Email, it would be very helpful. I just want to ensure that those participating in my contest are treated fairly and i have data to prove as to who is the winner. Thank You! Have a nice day! |
|
|
|
|
onlinepro
|
|
August 28, 2014, 01:41:19 PM |
|
Why didn't I received anything  |
|
|
|
|
Btcrockk (OP)
|
|
August 28, 2014, 01:43:51 PM |
|
This is not full list of transactions. Wait pls.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinlosa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2014, 02:52:10 PM |
|
Now we are glad to announce that we have found a partner.
Our plans is to move to new domains and back to stable work and payments in a few days.
Also we'll back to bigger win odds of LuckyCheckin in a few days. Stay in touch!
Congrats!! Also, don't change domains, forget about Adsense and keep looking new revenue sources |
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
August 28, 2014, 04:18:11 PM |
|
so... was this AdSense ban permanent?
Is it possible to be reactivated later once you have measures in to mitigate the click-bombing?
=squeak=
|
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
Happycrash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2014, 05:05:39 PM |
|
20 check in and only 270 satoshi, is a bad page now 1 day later, 42 check in and still 270 satoshi löööööölllllllll |
|
|
|
|
|
Btcrockk (OP)
|
|
August 28, 2014, 05:30:39 PM |
|
20 check in and only 270 satoshi, is a bad page now 1 day later, 42 check in and still 270 satoshi löööööölllllllll we'll back to bigger win odds in a few days |
|
|
|
|
maverick528
|
|
August 28, 2014, 05:50:42 PM |
|
Got a small part of my balance on hold. Thank you.
Shows this was not a scam and run operation.
|
|
|
|
micky123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 29, 2014, 05:20:59 AM |
|
Got a small part of my balance on hold. Thank you.
Shows this was not a scam and run operation.
It certainly looks legit at this point. Thank you for not scamming us BTCRockk... seen a lot of them lately!  Just a small observation, on the luckycheckin page, shouldn't it say 28.08 Payouts started? Just saying, many people may think that the last payout was made on 28/07 as mentioned currently!  |
|
|
|
|
RedDiamond
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:24:12 PM |
|
My values in "Balance" , "On hold" , and "Checkins" went to zero...  Are the payments over? Where is my money The BTC account used was " 1HyRxE3KiATQQuFS5Q3wq8Qz5CDkbKUAaQ " ... Please clarify... GroundZero Maybe she saw the name of your bitcointalk account Sorry, just kidding... Have you checked your address from blockchain.info: https://blockchain.info/address/1HyRxE3KiATQQuFS5Q3wq8Qz5CDkbKUAaQ ? There are some transfers from (LuckyCheckin, BtcRock!). |
|
|
|
|
|
