Looking to rent Full / Senior / Hero signatures | 0.01 BTC up front

[ned.ryerson]

Hello, I'm looking to rent full, senior, an hero signatures for my site BetTheCha.in.  PM me with your proposed rate/quality post and we'll see if we can work something out.

Edit (adding terms):

Terms:
No spam or "garbage" posts.  Maximum of 100 posts per month.  Minimum of 50 posts to qualify for payment.

The following will NOT be paid for:

• Trolling
• Bumping
• Spamming
• Agree with
• Single image
• And not related to the thread

Limited to 20 persons.

Only 1 account per person allowed. You must have trust >= 0 and no scammer labels.

You can only have the BetTheCha.in signature with the link. Nothing else. No other advertising or personal links etc.

[amitrwt]

Are you paying Upfront or using any escrow ..? you can PM me your Offer.

[ned.ryerson]

I am willing to use escrow of a highly reputable member here.

I will match PD's rates:

• Hero: 0.0012BTC/constructive post
• Senior: 0.001BTC/constructive post
• Full: 0.0006BTC/constructive post

I will pay bi-weekly.

[ned.ryerson]

I will pay 0.01BTC up front as soon as you update your signature for Senior members & up.

[Nobitcoin]

Count me in if you have me 

1NYaBPmrUjGZ5WA7iiPkDGcd7EBZKNTECW

[devthedev]

I will pay 0.01BTC up front as soon as you update your signature for Senior members & up.

Anything against using escrow?

[ned.ryerson]

I will pay 0.01BTC up front as soon as you update your signature for Senior members & up.

Anything against using escrow?

No issues with escrow.

[hilariousandco]

I am willing to use escrow of a highly reputable member here.

I will match PD's rates:

• Hero: 0.0012BTC/constructive post
• Senior: 0.001BTC/constructive post
• Full: 0.0006BTC/constructive post

I will pay bi-weekly.

I'm not sure why people would choose your deal over Stunna's to be honest. You'll probably have to think of ways to better his or the other deals. Why don't you consider one of the fixed rate deals where you pay 0.05 for 50 posts or whatever? You can cap the number of users and know exactly how much to budget for then.

[AcoinL.L.C]

I am willing to use escrow of a highly reputable member here.

I will match PD's rates:

• Hero: 0.0012BTC/constructive post
• Senior: 0.001BTC/constructive post
• Full: 0.0006BTC/constructive post

I will pay bi-weekly.

I'm not sure why people would choose your deal over Stunna's to be honest. You'll probably have to think of ways to better his or the other deals. Why don't you consider one of the fixed rate deals where you pay 0.05 for 50 posts or whatever? You can cap the number of users and know exactly how much to budget for then.

This is better in the sense you get paid a lot quicker, every 2 weeks, not to mention that Primedice is slow paying out (He has 100++ people on his service, fully understandable) anyways.

I would sign up for this except I currently only have member status

[Nobitcoin]

Starting Post : 781
Bitcoin Address : 1NYaBPmrUjGZ5WA7iiPkDGcd7EBZKNTECW

[u9y42]

I'm not sure why people would choose your deal over Stunna's to be honest. You'll probably have to think of ways to better his or the other deals. Why don't you consider one of the fixed rate deals where you pay 0.05 for 50 posts or whatever? You can cap the number of users and know exactly how much to budget for then.

This is better in the sense you get paid a lot quicker, every 2 weeks, not to mention that Primedice is slow paying out (He has 100++ people on his service, fully understandable) anyways.

I would sign up for this except I currently only have member status

Agreed, this being bi-weekly will attract some people; that said, even slightly better rates (and perhaps limiting the number of participants from the beginning, and max number of posts) would go a long way towards making this campaign much more attractive.

[ned.ryerson]

I'm not sure why people would choose your deal over Stunna's to be honest. You'll probably have to think of ways to better his or the other deals. Why don't you consider one of the fixed rate deals where you pay 0.05 for 50 posts or whatever? You can cap the number of users and know exactly how much to budget for then.

This is better in the sense you get paid a lot quicker, every 2 weeks, not to mention that Primedice is slow paying out (He has 100++ people on his service, fully understandable) anyways.

I would sign up for this except I currently only have member status

Agreed, this being bi-weekly will attract some people; that said, even slightly better rates (and perhaps limiting the number of participants from the beginning, and max number of posts) would go a long way towards making this campaign much more attractive.

We probably will close it off once we reach a certain limit.  We haven't decided what that is yet.

[beetcoin]

I am willing to use escrow of a highly reputable member here.

I will match PD's rates:

• Hero: 0.0012BTC/constructive post
• Senior: 0.001BTC/constructive post
• Full: 0.0006BTC/constructive post

I will pay bi-weekly.

I'm not sure why people would choose your deal over Stunna's to be honest. You'll probably have to think of ways to better his or the other deals. Why don't you consider one of the fixed rate deals where you pay 0.05 for 50 posts or whatever? You can cap the number of users and know exactly how much to budget for then.

i can think of two things: first, it's paid bi-weekly. secondly, he doesn't have a billion people in his campaign, so you will get your remittance quicker probably. i'd still stick with stunna though.

[hilariousandco]

But this guy has zero trust so far so I think getting payments twice a month doesn't really hold much weight, at least in my opinion, but if people want to take that risk for slightly faster payments then go for it. Stunna did mention the possibility of weekly payments too though. And as for slow paying, at least you're guaranteed to get paid. Can't say that for many of these other deals.

[u9y42]

But this guy has zero trust so far so I think getting payments twice a month doesn't really hold much weight, at least in my opinion, but if people want to take that risk for slightly faster payments then go for it. Stunna did mention the possibility of weekly payments too though. And as for slow paying, at least you're guaranteed to get paid. Can't say that for many of these other deals.

Well, ned.ryerson did say he was willing to use the services of an escrow from this forum; it's hard not to consider that a sufficient safeguard.

Also, I doubt PD will switch to weekly payments anytime soon. Between the amount of members in the campaign and the new system not really being fully automated (like Ritz's was for example), it would be far too much trouble to go with anything but monthly payments.

[hilariousandco]

Lots of people say they're willing to escrow and then don't, but he'll have to put quite a bit in escrow unless he caps the numbers and limits the amounts of posts or he'll soon go out of budget. Even putting 1btc in escrow probably won't really suffice without some heavy restrictions.

[u9y42]

Lots of people say they're willing to escrow and then don't, but he'll have to put quite a bit in escrow unless he caps the numbers and limits the amounts of posts or he'll soon go out of budget. Even putting 1btc in escrow probably won't really suffice without some heavy restrictions.

As he said, they haven't decided on what limits will be implemented in the campaign yet:

We probably will close it off once we reach a certain limit.  We haven't decided what that is yet.

And if it happens that he says he's willing to use escrow and then doesn't, that's already a good sign of trouble coming. But until anything close to it happens, there's little point in us going on about it.

[PolarPoint]

Can anyone see the catch in this campaign?

A newbie sets up a gambling game where you send bets to a handful of addresses, then later starts a biweekly sig campaign to promote the game. What if the profits from the gambling game cannot cover the campaign payout? What if the campaign brings volume to the game and this newbie decides to vanish in two weeks?

Don't join this unless OP decides to use escrow. The rates aren't that good anyway.

[u9y42]

Can anyone see the catch in this campaign?

A newbie sets up a gambling game where you send bets to a handful of addresses, then later starts a biweekly sig campaign to promote the game. What if the profits from the gambling game cannot cover the campaign payout? What if the campaign brings volume to the game and this newbie decides to vanish in two weeks?

Don't join this unless OP decides to use escrow. The rates aren't that good anyway.

Could you guys take a step back for a bit? He's already saying he'll pay a portion upfront to Senior/Hero Members, saying he will use escrow from a trusted forum member, and is willing to pay twice a month.  Now, of course it's probably a good idea to wait for him to actually decide on the limits of the campaign, and to escrow enough for half a month/one month before considering joining the campaign; but other than that, there really isn't much more anyone can do to prove their good intentions.

[Nobitcoin]

Look I'm ready to trust him since I just got burned by my previous campaign XBTec which looks like has turned into a scam. So I seeing if this works or not