LOL, banks are not governments.
Banks could probably make oxygen illegal if they wanted to.
Remember Viet Nam? Iraq, Afghanistan, and the whole Middle East are being facilitated into the thing that was behind Viet Nam. Here's what it is.
The banks didn't have clear strength in Viet Nam. There were too many powerful individuals there, who would not work with the banks. The war was about subduing those individuals by either removing them, or by incorporating them - more or less voluntarily under threat - into the world banking system.
Google "Viet Nam." Today that country has a higher standard of living than it has ever had before... with regard to the general public, that is. Of course, they have the same minor slavery that Europe and America have - the slavery of having to pay a portion of their funds to the banks through taxes.
The bankers have come to understand that if you want to enslave the people, you need to let the people think that they have freedom. And in order to do this, you have to give them some REAL freedom. In fact, almost all the wars of the 1900s were about the bankers taking over, so that they could give the nations of the world, say, 90% freedom, while enslaving them through taxes of one form of another to the tune of 10% that would be turned over to the bankers. That's what WWI, WWII, Korea, Viet Nam, Kroatia, etc., and now the Middle East, Yemen, Pakistan, and now, also, the Ukraine are all about. It's all about the bankers retaining control to keep the people free enough so that they unknowingly and unwittingly hand over a certain percentage of their labor to the banks.
Governments are secondary. Virtually all wars are bankers' wars. Banks rule.
What will bankers do when they have established themselves securely in power over the whole world? Who knows? But, they are aware that if they don't have the strength of direct force to use on the people, the people will rebel.
Bitcoin will have to be removed. Bitcoin has the potential strength to destroy the banking system, worldwide.
