Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 05:03:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Alleged Benghazi Ringleader Was Reportedly Responding To The Anti-Islam Video  (Read 3315 times)
noviapriani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 03:40:43 PM
 #21

The attack was inspired by the video at least among some attendees just as the administration believed and told the public.  Jihadists were involved as the administration also told the public.  When it was planned and the extent of the planning remain unknown.

Hindsight suggests security could have been better.  Consulate security budget increases were shot down by the GOP.

and oh yeah.....Obama is president and he did not fly in with a cape and save every last human.   Damn I hate him.

1715144632
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715144632

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715144632
Reply with quote  #2

1715144632
Report to moderator
1715144632
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715144632

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715144632
Reply with quote  #2

1715144632
Report to moderator
1715144632
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715144632

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715144632
Reply with quote  #2

1715144632
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715144632
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715144632

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715144632
Reply with quote  #2

1715144632
Report to moderator
1715144632
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715144632

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715144632
Reply with quote  #2

1715144632
Report to moderator
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 03:42:25 PM
 #22

An alleged ringleader of the September 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, who is now in U.S. custody, reportedly told other Libyans during the attack that he was responding to an anti-Islam video that had been published on YouTube, demolishing a prominent right-wing media attack.

Conservatives in the media have fixated on Obama administration statements shortly after the attacks suggesting that the video had been a motive for the attackers. Conservatives have alleged that these statements were part of a deliberate effort to deceive the American people about the cause of the terror attacks in order to bolster President Obama's re-election campaign.

Ahmed Abu Khattala was captured Sunday by U.S. military and law enforcement in response to an indictment for murder in connection with his role as a suspected ringleader of the Benghazi attacks.

Abu Khattala told Libyans the night of the attack "that he was moved to attack the diplomatic mission to take revenge for an insult to Islam in an American-made online video," according to The New York Times. From the Times:

    What he did in the period just before the attack has remained unclear. But Mr. Abu Khattala told other Libyans in private conversations during the night of the attack that he was moved to attack the diplomatic mission to take revenge for an insult to Islam in an American-made online video.

    An earlier demonstration venting anger over the video outside the American Embassy in Cairo had culminated in a breach of its walls, and it dominated Arab news coverage. Mr. Abu Khattala told both fellow Islamist fighters and others that the attack in Benghazi was retaliation for the same insulting video, according to people who heard him.

    In an interview days after the attack, he pointedly declined to say whether he believed an offense such as the anti-Islamic video might indeed warrant the destruction of the diplomatic mission or the killing of the ambassador. "From a religious point of view, it is hard to say whether it is good or bad," he said.

The Times article is consistent with media reports from the scene of the attack that suggested the anti-Islam video had been a motive for at least some of the attackers. That video triggered anti-American protests across the Muslim world.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/06/17/captured-alleged-benghazi-ringleader-was-report/199771
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-captured-benghazi-suspect-in-secret-raid/2014/06/17/7ef8746e-f5cf-11e3-a3a5-42be35962a52_story.html?hpid=z1

The momo video was released weeks before the attack. This was not a spontaneous attack. Not a coincidence on that date. There was a plane ready to take off  This dude was roaming free since the attack. He gave a 2 hour audio only interview to CNN in 2013.



http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2014/06/17/damon-benghazi-ahmed-abu-khattalah-intv-2013.cnn.html

Saying this Benghazi affair is a scandal does not automatically make people who believe this Bush lovers or racist KKK members.

Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 04:03:19 PM
 #23

The attack was inspired by the video at least among some attendees just as the administration believed and told the public.  Jihadists were involved as the administration also told the public.  When it was planned and the extent of the planning remain unknown.

Hindsight suggests security could have been better.  Consulate security budget increases were shot down by the GOP.

and oh yeah.....Obama is president and he did not fly in with a cape and save every last human.   Damn I hate him.

Benghazi Whistleblower Confirms the Military was ordered to STAND DOWN
http://youtu.be/duAgvzw6MHU

This whistleblower is a long time faithful democrat, long time civil servant. No reason to believe he voted for any republicans or is a secret KKK member.

Docs show Amb. Stevens asked -personally- for more security
http://youtu.be/zFKGX4ZhH-k

JohnnyLightning
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 04:11:11 PM
 #24

Wow, the propaganda never ends.  When reading the headline of this thread, my first thought was that it was an Onion article.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   DeepOnion    Anonymous and Untraceable Cryptocurrency    TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN THE NEW AIRDROP ✈️        VERIFIED WITH DEEPVAULT  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN  WHITEPAPER  FACEBOOK  TWITTER  YOUTUBE  FORUM   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 06:20:37 PM
 #25

I stand corrected on the Libyan Presidents "belief" of pre-planning, but note that the leader of the attack states that it was not pre-planned but seen as an opportunity when the protest over the movie was taking place.

But, like Republicans, I have no doubt the President of Libya knew more about the attack than the guy leading the attack, right?

Seriously, just how will you defend the indefensible when the attackers say the movie was part of the events of the day?

What kind of insanity claims republicans know more than the guys leading the attack?


...and yet

[...]
As a radical Islamic army marches across Iraq, America is making a deal with the devil. Qassem Suleymani, the head of Iran’s secretive Quds Force, is allied with us in Baghdad — but he’s plotted to kill Americans elsewhere.

As Kenneth R. Timmerman reveals in his new book, “Dark Forces,” Suleymani was even the shadowy figure behind the killing of Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi, Libya.

He’s the Wizard of Oz of Iranian terror, the most dreaded and most effective terrorist alive.

He is Qassem Suleymani, the head of the Quds Force, an organization that acts as a combination CIA and Green Berets for Iran, and a man who has orchestrated a campaign of chaos against the United States around the world.

Today, the Obama Administration has allied itself with Suleymani to fight the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. In this case, Iran’s goals — a Shi’ite-friendly government in Iraq — coincides with America’s hope that the country doesn’t fall apart. But don’t be fooled: It’s only a partnership of convenience, and one that won’t last.


http://nypost.com/2014/06/20/how-irans-spy-chief-paid-for-the-benghazi-attack/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So we need to believe that:

. this attack was not planned
. The video on youtube was the trigger
. the ambassador was responsible of his own death
. 7 hours of relentless attack was too short for a quick military intervention
. the next day obama went for fundraising in las vegas he did not know the details about how his own ambassador died
. the NSA knows everything, nothing can escape its tentacles... except how exactly those americans died
. the CIA was not involved, although their top secret compound was attacked
. the dude who made the video spent a year in jail
. the dude 'now responsible only because of the momo video' meanwhile was sipping "72 virgins edition" margaritas, waiting for him to be arrested
. obama learnt all of that reading the morning newspaper

Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
June 22, 2014, 06:26:23 PM
 #26

Wow, the propaganda never ends.  When reading the headline of this thread, my first thought was that it was an Onion article.
No it does not end.  Appears to be strictly an Obama phenomenon in my opinion.  We sure haven't seen anything like it in the US before.  We've seen it in other countries and laughed about it.
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 09:18:29 PM
 #27

Just a few general questions here:

First, should we not all first and foremost agree that capturing this guy is good news?

Second, trial and conviction is perfect. We have over 200 such terrorist convictions under US law. Seven under military tribunal.

Third, those citing the NY Times investigation are exactly the same people for denounced the NY Times investigation for the conclusions it did make. And now they are here to cite the Times for what it did not conclude. Now that is funny.

Fourth, if the guy who led the terrorist attack claims it all started with a protest against the movie, who here thinks they know more than he did about that night?

Fifth, if it all did begin as a protest against the movie, so what? The first Intel reports given by Rice suggested that and that is good, it means they were right and the movie was a factor.

Sixth, there appears to be no al Qaeda connection here, offsetting a right wing claim that the intent was to coverup Al Qadea's continued existance.

 

Now if what the  guy said is confirmed, then everything the administraiton said is absolutely true, largely the NY Times conclusion of their investigation.

So what? Good news, your government got it right.


Good news, your government is lying to you? Surely you would be in the streets, burning some garbage cans if Bush was in power and Rice was talking about a youtube video...



Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 09:49:11 PM
 #28





http://youtu.be/NQ0d6J2xCzg



http://youtu.be/uFf0dUH3OtU



http://youtu.be/MB-itn_LJuM



http://youtu.be/lS0kvnMFepI

You know those obama supporters here are insane when wiling to defend the words of a terrorist but wiling not to believe a long time civil servant like Hicks. They've made a full 360 in their head, embracing the very evil that made them pour so much hopenchange in that clown in "charge"... You are wiling to lose any sort of personal "honor" by defending "your" team no matter how amazingly corrupt it is. You will all go down in History with it. Don't leave the Titanic Cult yet... Lots of Kool-aid still on board...


Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 11:15:06 PM
 #29




However, when Hillary picked up the phone and heard Obama’s voice, she learned the president had other ideas in mind. With less than two months before Election Day, he was still boasting that he had al Qaeda on the run.
If the truth about Benghazi became known, it would blow that argument out of the water.
“Hillary was stunned when she heard the president talk about the Benghazi attack,” one of her top legal advisers said in an interview. “Obama wanted her to say that the attack had been a spontaneous demonstration triggered by an obscure video on the Internet that demeaned the Prophet Mohammed.”

This adviser continued: “Hillary told Obama, ‘Mr. President, that story isn’t credible. Among other things, it ignores the fact that the attack occurred on 9/11.’ But the president was adamant. He said, ‘Hillary, I need you to put out a State Department release as soon as possible.’”

After her conversation with the president, Hillary called Bill Clinton, who was at his penthouse apartment in the William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, and told him what Obama wanted her to do.
“I’m sick about it,” she said, according to the legal adviser, who was filled in on the conversation.
“That story won’t hold up,” Bill said. “I know,” Hillary said. “I told the president that.” “It’s an impossible story,” Bill said. “I can’t believe the president is claiming it wasn’t terrorism. Then again, maybe I can. It looks like Obama isn’t going to allow anyone to say that terrorism has occurred on his watch.”
Hillary’s legal adviser provided further detail: “During their phone call, Bill started playing with various doomsday scenarios, up to and including the idea that Hillary consider resigning as secretary of state over the issue. But both he and Hillary quickly agreed that resigning wasn’t a realistic option.
If her resignation hurt Obama’s chances of winning re-election, her fellow Democrats would never forgive her. Hillary was already thinking of running for president in 2016, and her political future, as well as Obama’s, hung in the balance.”

Obama had put Hillary in a corner, and she and Bill didn’t see a way out. And so, shortly after 10 o’clock on the night of September 11, she released an official statement that blamed the Benghazi attack on an “inflammatory (video) posted on the Internet.”
The Benghazi Deception was in full swing.

http://nypost.com/2014/06/22/clinton-bristled-at-benghazi-deception-book/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, according to Hillary Clinton, NOT some unknown KKK republicans, obama is a P.O.S. Liar in Chief. She told him NOT to lie and he did it anyway... MMmmuuhahahahahahahahahahaaaa!!!!!

Sorry sana. Hillary can't lie, can she?  Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy


Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!