slimcoin (OP)
|
|
June 23, 2014, 10:32:10 PM |
|
SlimcoinNew Block Generation through Proof-of-Burn Even a Raspberry Pi can competitively mine, fast hardware offers no advantageWebsitehttps://slimcoin.orgSlimcoin was relaunched continuing from block 15935 on the old blockchain. It encountered a few issues with blockchain synchronization, but those have been long fixed and is soaring. Official launch thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.0 Specifications- Uses Dcrypt algorithm, an algorithm made to be difficult to implement on an ASIC.
This is done so that by the time any ASICs are made, Proof-of-Burn hash became bigger than Proof-of-Work - Tri-Hybrid Blocks: Proof-of-Burn blocks, Proof-of-Stake blocks, Proof-of-Work blocks
- Block time is 1.5 minutes (90 seconds)
- Difficulty re-targets continuously
- Block Rewards:
- Proof-of-Burn blocks: max 250 coins
- Proof-of-Work blocks: max 50 coins
- Block rewards decrease in value as the difficulty increases
- Total 250 million coins
General Details of What is NewSlimcoin burn mining is truly ASIC-proof. The main point of Proof-of-Burn is that " superior and faster mining hardware offers no advantage". With all of these ASICs coming out for Scrypt now, many people are coming up with "ASIC proof" algorithms. Those are simply patches since mostly anything can be implemented on a custom ASICs an it is wrong to claim any hashing algorithm is ASIC proof. The best ASIC resistance is to not need them at all. Slimcoin utilizes that exactly. It does not focus on proof-of-work that much. It uses a new method of coin generation called proof-of-burn. Long story short, competitive mining can be done with a Raspberry Pi (super-low-power computer), literally. Proof of Burn and Low Power Requirements: Proof-of-Burn mining is different from Proof-of-Work mining. More computers and higher computational power offers no advantage over slower computers. In short, how this is achieved is: when one burns coins, that transaction can be used to calculate burn hashes. There is also a multiplier that is multiplied to the raw burn hash to calculate the final burn hash. The greater amount of coins burnt by a user, the smaller the multiplier will be and the smaller the burn hashes will be. The smaller the burn hash is, the more likely the hash will meet the difficulty target (be accepted by the network as valid). Over time, the multiplier of a single burn transaction increases slowly, lowering the effectiveness of those burn hashes, acting like "decaying burnt coins". Per transaction, only 1 burn hashes is needed to be calculated per ~90 seconds. The reason low power can mine this is because basically almost any machine can hash a few SHA256 hashes in ~90 seconds. More information on Proof-of-Burn can be found here. Technical Whitepaper:An extensive explanation of what Slimcoin has new to offer: Slimcoin Whitepaper PDFDownloads:Executable available for both Linux and Windows https://github.com/slimcoin/slicmoin-executableConfig File:addnode=76.127.202.17:41680 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192
Exchanges:BTER SLM/BTC exarena SLM/BTCPoolsSlimcoin pool Block Quarry Slimcoin Pool Slimcoin HashHarderSlimminer DownloadsWindows Source CodeTutorial for Linux source code compilation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.msg7192912#msg7192912Tutorial for Windows source code compilation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.msg7090075#msg7090075IRC Channel#OfficialSlimcoinReddithttp://www.reddit.com/r/slimcoin/Donation Address for Bounties:ShooqRfkshDajLTvYMEKRKxXW7ooZLBZsm
|
-Much Donate BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 10:34:07 PM |
|
RESERVED
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
June 23, 2014, 10:34:34 PM |
|
I do not understand this kind of "relaunch". 18K blocks mined already.
|
|
|
|
|
kashish948
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 10:57:49 PM |
|
looks interesting
|
|
|
|
Richard213
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:05:19 PM |
|
I do not understand this kind of "relaunch". 18K blocks mined already.
this cause by broken wallet that stuck in 192XX but now they fixed it, maybe ================================= hey, my wallet still stuck in 191xx is there any solution for my problem?
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:07:00 PM |
|
I do not understand this kind of "relaunch". 18K blocks mined already.
this cause by broken wallet that stuck in 192XX but now they fixed it, maybe ================================= hey, my wallet still stuck in 191xx is there any solution for my problem? Its been fixed read the original thread....
|
|
|
|
Chris001
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
electroneum.com
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:15:34 PM |
|
Looks like this will be the first time I actually mine.
Am I reading this right, that my slow computer will have equal, chance for a block as everyone who has fast computers/cards?
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=186785Here is the link to my trust settings here on forum. This trust system is very unfair. I make good on every deal Ive ever made. I had many, many deals as you can see and I never scammed anyone. All it takes is a random account to give you negative trust and youre screwed. Tomatocage has never even talked to me ever but when the random acct hit me with negative trust, Tomatocage came right behind him and marked neg trust again so obviously he was the one who did it. You can look at Tomatocage trust and see how many of his compeditors at the currency exchange thread he labeled scammers. I never scammed anyone. My trust was green over 20 before this. I hope it never happens to you because the mods cant help you.
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:18:20 PM |
|
Looks like this will be the first time I actually mine.
Am I reading this right, that my slow computer will have equal, chance for a block as everyone who has fast computers/cards?
Yes.
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:35:02 PM |
|
Am I reading this right, that my slow computer will have equal, chance for a block as everyone who has fast computers/cards?
Depends on what part you're asking about. PoW blocks - if you have a faster computer, you'll still get more blocks. If you have a network with some beefy computers, you'll get a whole lot more blocks. If you somehow figured out how to make a nice GPU miner, you'd get more blocks still. PoB blocks - technically, yes. I'd say read the whitepaper for some of the details.
|
|
|
|
ordeath
Member
Offline
Activity: 228
Merit: 10
|
|
June 23, 2014, 11:38:17 PM |
|
日期:2014/6/24 04:01 支出0.00 SLM 网络金额: -35.75 SLM 交易ID: 80b095668bbdacb189ad17840b3ca8c3593dcc30b108680394b478fd21058762
Staked coins must wait 520 blocks before they can return to balance and be spent. When you generated this proof-of-stake block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, it will change to "not accepted" and not be a valid stake. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a proof-of-stake block within a few seconds of yours.
Debug information
Debit: -35.75 SLM Credit: 17.87 SLM Credit: 17.888706 SLM
Transaction: Coinstake(hash=80b095668b, nTime=1403553689, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=3, nLockTime=0) CTxIn(COutPoint(c407e004fccddea197df44db35567b30625114b6436c020230d895697de02c15, 0), scriptSig=3046022100c2284ea417a9a1) CTxOut(empty) CTxOut(nValue=17.87, scriptPubKey=038fedf1b4eea01c04800d99332b7a87078589dc4ae60e5d8b1888a73ef99ef8ae OP_CHECKSIG) CTxOut(nValue=17.888706, scriptPubKey=038fedf1b4eea01c04800d99332b7a87078589dc4ae60e5d8b1888a73ef99ef8ae OP_CHECKSIG)
Inputs: SewW3jcTbNzac95t34bSkY17uhUtVGUHSQ Amount=35.75 SLM IsMine=true
Why is this so?
|
|
|
|
qiuxiang
|
|
June 24, 2014, 12:40:29 AM |
|
Our old thread is good, why do we start a new one?
|
|
|
|
ynyjl
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2014, 03:10:13 AM |
|
日期:2014/6/24 04:01 支出0.00 SLM 网络金额: -35.75 SLM 交易ID: 80b095668bbdacb189ad17840b3ca8c3593dcc30b108680394b478fd21058762
Staked coins must wait 520 blocks before they can return to balance and be spent. When you generated this proof-of-stake block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, it will change to "not accepted" and not be a valid stake. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a proof-of-stake block within a few seconds of yours.
Debug information
Debit: -35.75 SLM Credit: 17.87 SLM Credit: 17.888706 SLM
Transaction: Coinstake(hash=80b095668b, nTime=1403553689, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=3, nLockTime=0) CTxIn(COutPoint(c407e004fccddea197df44db35567b30625114b6436c020230d895697de02c15, 0), scriptSig=3046022100c2284ea417a9a1) CTxOut(empty) CTxOut(nValue=17.87, scriptPubKey=038fedf1b4eea01c04800d99332b7a87078589dc4ae60e5d8b1888a73ef99ef8ae OP_CHECKSIG) CTxOut(nValue=17.888706, scriptPubKey=038fedf1b4eea01c04800d99332b7a87078589dc4ae60e5d8b1888a73ef99ef8ae OP_CHECKSIG)
Inputs: SewW3jcTbNzac95t34bSkY17uhUtVGUHSQ Amount=35.75 SLM IsMine=true
Why is this so?
17.87+17.888706~=35.75
|
|
|
|
idad01
|
|
June 24, 2014, 03:27:14 AM |
|
Need to restart the 15,935 it? If it is, I will suspend my miner!
|
|
|
|
Cashmenwa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2014, 03:52:00 AM |
|
Our old thread is good, why do we start a new one?
Avoid mistakes Better communication So start a new one
|
|
|
|
lonelygirl
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2014, 03:57:12 AM |
|
I do not understand this kind of "relaunch". 18K blocks mined already.
this is a shit coin, relaunch is just attract people.
|
|
|
|
lonelygirl
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2014, 03:58:04 AM |
|
Our old thread is good, why do we start a new one?
Avoid mistakes Better communication So start a new one maybe the dev want to hide something.
|
|
|
|
kentwo
|
|
June 24, 2014, 04:15:07 AM |
|
how about the old thead?
|
|
|
|
heibitchi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2014, 04:17:20 AM |
|
Relaunch from 0 block?
|
|
|
|
jadefalke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1014
|
|
June 24, 2014, 04:41:29 AM |
|
Relaunch from 0 block?
no the Relaunch was after block 15935
|
|
|
|
|