** should we BAN SPOETNIK?

[TheAmbassador]

He is an egotistical asshole who adds nothing positive to the forum.

But he will just start another account anyway if banned

[Lauda]

lulz spoetniks irrelevant posts are interesting to read, my vote is NO

Some are relevant though, both amusing.

[croato]

My vote is no. If someone should be banned, mods will do it. Freedom of speach is important and if someone dont like other member posts he dont have to read them.

[zachamo]

Come from Above, you're a piece of work. Take that as you will 

[kalus]

make your thoughts about Come-from-Above heard here!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=664387.0

I don't have anything against Spoetnik i had no problem this but you must be either his sockpuppet or gigantic troll...

interesting anything you don't agree with must be either a sockpuppet or trolling.

OP specifically said:

yes my friend freedom of speech is fine, Spoetnik is not.  his entire being is a problem.

democratic and free vote.  any1 can vote yes or no.

to be clear: OP is both a sockpuppet and a troll.  he begged for an open discussion, and i'm giving it.  Originally, my thread started out as a parody thread, which is enabled by freedom of speech, but we found out something interesting.

However you might disagree with my statements i'm still engaging in free speech, and I am discussing both users: Spoetnik and with Come-from-Above.  I think both of them are problematic.  It's clear both users have gained fanatics and enemies, but Come-from-Above is far less charming than Spoetnik.  surprised the fuck out of me, but there you go.  

[From Above]

make your thoughts about Come-from-Above heard here!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=664387.0

I don't have anything against Spoetnik i had no problem this but you must be either his sockpuppet or gigantic troll...

interesting anything you don't agree with must be either a sockpuppet or trolling.  

OP specifically said:

yes my friend freedom of speech is fine, Spoetnik is not.  his entire being is a problem.

democratic and free vote.  any1 can vote yes or no.

to be clear: OP is both a sockpuppet and a troll.  however, i'm engaging in free speech, and I am discussing both the issue with Spoetnik and with Come-from-Above.  it's clear both users have gained fanatics and enemies, but Come-from-Above is far less charming than Spoetnik.  surprised the fuck out of me, but there you go.  

so u say kalus is a sockpuppet of the Spoetnik?  Maybe maybe but i dont think so, i really dont do,  kalus writing seems reasonable,  Spoetnik writes like sb desperately in need of serious mental help(like me,im a patient).

~CfA~

[ShibecoinSucks]

Well, I voted to ban him. But that is only because his nonsense ramblings and garbage talk really don't advance or progress the discussions in any threads.....its just trolling or bitching about random shit. The guy must not have a life, or maybe he's on meth or something.


Edit: But honestly both of these idiots should be banned.

[lynn_402]

The "should we ban x" threads make no sense.

If someone annoys you, there's the very useful ignore button, which makes him go away from all threads instantly.
And it has the added benefit that he won't simply come back with another account after being banned anyways.

[ShibecoinSucks]

/ignore lynn_402

[foodies123]

how about we ban you op ?

[kalus]

how about we ban you op ?

come join the discussion, foodies123

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=664387.msg7497404

[xenia4774]

You asking about banning someone!!!


OMG now we've seen it all guys!!

[bcd]

I enjoy reading Spoetnik's posts. Entertaining most of the time.