Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 04:13:15 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: About Pool Workers....  (Read 1080 times)
TyrTheAlpha (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:17:46 PM
 #1

A co-miner and I have been wondering about workers: If you have say three (3) Antminer S1’s on the same pool using the same worker does it make a difference to your overall hash rate or efficiency?
smanches
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:33:32 PM
 #2

It does not affect your long term efficiency at all.
aosmith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2014, 05:37:19 PM
 #3

A co-miner and I have been wondering about workers: If you have say three (3) Antminer S1’s on the same pool using the same worker does it make a difference to your overall hash rate or efficiency?

The only difference I can discern is the difficulty of that worker... You should be fine either way.
maxl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 05:41:40 PM
 #4

It don´t make any difference. In some pools you have a the option that you get notified if one worker is idle for some time. So you know (via e-mail) which antminer has a failure when you use different workers.
DrG
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 07:04:50 PM
 #5

It don´t make any difference. In some pools you have a the option that you get notified if one worker is idle for some time. So you know (via e-mail) which antminer has a failure when you use different workers.

Pretty much this.  You could run 50 PH/s on the same worker if the pool supported the difficulty.  The only reason people make multiple miners is that it is easier to track down if one unit is acting up or fails completely.
TyrTheAlpha (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:13:21 PM
 #6

Thanks, people  Smiley
Harley997
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:24:10 AM
 #7

A co-miner and I have been wondering about workers: If you have say three (3) Antminer S1’s on the same pool using the same worker does it make a difference to your overall hash rate or efficiency?
Assuming that all of machines are working as expected then you will not lose any efficiency.

When one of them starts to have problems you will have difficulty determining which one is having problems as the stats of all three will be combined.

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
solosequenosenada
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 542


Freedom dies from suicide


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 03:30:37 PM
 #8

Same in p2pool?
Collider
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 25, 2014, 04:15:12 PM
 #9

Same in p2pool?
Yes. Stats might be displayed more accurately with more hashpower on one address though.
guitarplinker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
June 25, 2014, 04:34:03 PM
 #10

Same in p2pool?
There should be no difference with P2Pool compared to a normal pool.
Harley997
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 12:36:14 AM
 #11

Same in p2pool?
Yes. Stats might be displayed more accurately with more hashpower on one address though.
How would they be displayed more accurately? This may be true for very low hashrates, but once hashrates get to a measurable level the pool should be able to display the hashrate just fine. 

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!