GLBSE 2.0 release delayed again!

[Nefario]

Will we be having fewer sql database lockups in the new version?

0 is the expected number of DB lockups in the new version.

Just an update on where I'm currently at, the demo site will be updated in a couple of hours, hacking away, wired up to my eyeballs on Rockstar XDurance(think RedBull but strong, bigger can, and cheaper).

[1715155603]

1715155603

[1715155603]

1715155603

[Nefario]

I've updated the test site, added loads of functionality and introduced loads of bugs.

It's ugly, but it just about works.

Go to http://dev.glbse.com

Feedback welcome

[JL421]

I got an ArgumentError at /asset/create...when trying to ...well you know...even though it still shows up?

But when you click on the asset you get a lovely NoMethodError at /asset/view/JLP-BMDT

Then when I choose an asset account, I can't change back to my BTC accounts.

[Nefario]

I got an ArgumentError at /asset/create...when trying to ...well you know...even though it still shows up?

But when you click on the asset you get a lovely NoMethodError at /asset/view/JLP-BMDT

Then when I choose an asset account, I can't change back to my BTC accounts.

Thanks, fixed the first bug, is the second one (not being able to switch back to BTC account) still happening?

[JL421]

Yep, can't switch away from JLP-BMDT

[Nefario]

Yep, can't switch away from JLP-BMDT

Brilliant, thanks for that, it was a bug, fixed now.

[JL421]

Yes it is. Thanks

[JL421]

More bugs...

When issuing additional shares I get this.

Sinatra doesn’t know this ditty.


Try this:
get '/asset/issue/JLP-BMDT' do
  "Hello World"
end

[Nefario]

More bugs...

When issuing additional shares I get this.

Sinatra doesn’t know this ditty.


Try this:
get '/asset/issue/JLP-BMDT' do
  "Hello World"
end

Oh, yeah that. actually I was supposed to remove that link.

I'm getting rid of the simple issue and sell shares, in the future, when you want to issue shares it's going to be put to motion. That won't be available at launch though.

Thanks for finding that though.

[JL421]

I'm apparently going to keep going here...

Can't sell any assets...

NameError at /trade/process_sell/JLP-BMDT
uninitialized constant AssetAccount::Not_assets
file: module.rb location: const_missing line: 36

[Nefario]

I'm apparently going to keep going here...

Can't sell any assets...

NameError at /trade/process_sell/JLP-BMDT
uninitialized constant AssetAccount::Not_assets
file: module.rb location: const_missing line: 36

Have you checked to see if you have any assets in your account to sell?

I have a feeling that your balance is probably 0

This is because of the IPO, when you create a new asset it makes an IPO, when the IPO reaches the launch date it will deposit the specified amount of assets into your account.

Before the IPO launches people can make buy orders.

I'm going to have to remove the sell link if your balance is 0.

If you want to test selling assets, create a new one and put the IPO date in the past, it should pretty much just deposit the shares into the account right away then (but without a public IPO page).

Nefario.

[JL421]

Mmmmk...makes sense.

[Nefario]

Delayed again, see op

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=66505.msg771771#msg771771

[OgNasty]

Take your time.  Get some sleep.

[JL421]

Yes, sleep, get everything worked out how it should be then come let it out.

Even if everything was ready right now, people would still be asking questions, and you'd be too burnt out to answer.

[Nefario]

Will we be having fewer sql database lockups in the new version?

We shouldn't have any.

[JL421]

Will we be having fewer sql database lockups in the new version?

We shouldn't have any.

Didn't you already answer that?

[Nefario]

Will we be having fewer sql database lockups in the new version?

We shouldn't have any.

Didn't you already answer that?

  I think I need more sleep.

[mila]

will you keep fixing 1.0 bugs in the meantime?
or rather not but you might want to notice we have TyGrr-Bank situation where ask=bid=.103 and orders are not paired

[Nefario]

will you keep fixing 1.0 bugs in the meantime?
or rather not but you might want to notice we have TyGrr-Bank situation where ask=bid=.103 and orders are not paired

It's really odd. All I can say for this is to cancel the order and try again.

Nefario.