Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 12:49:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: massive cold storage of bitcoins?  (Read 3307 times)
the_sunship (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:40:53 PM
 #1

There's another post on reddit today of someone who had 35 BTC stolen from "secure" wallets.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/

Certainly it seems like this guy knew what he was doing, but still somehow managed to get his BTC stolen....

I myself have taken all my bitcoins off of coinbase except for small amount. Except for a few donations, I haven't spent any this year.
I'm wondering, if investors put most of their bitcoins in cold storage (and subsequently, not use them for currency), what will be the result?

On one hand, they become more rare and they are held more tightly, which would seem to make them more valuable. On the other hand, they won't be used very much, which might mean they don't have as much value.
I'm not sure what to conclude. There are a lot of very smart people here and I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

 
Febo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:44:17 PM
 #2

That is biggest problem of BitCoin, people don't look at it as a money to use it, but as a treasury to keep for rainy days.
Don007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007

Live like there is no tomorrow!


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:47:08 PM
 #3

That is biggest problem of BitCoin, people don't look at it as a money to use it, but as a treasury to keep for rainy days.


Not all do, but many indeed. You know why? Because the price is still this speculative and the Bitcoin has a great potential: I think most of the users at these forums keep some of their BTC for the future, "just in case" it becomes worth much more.  And they're right.

I also use it the same way. I've got a part of my BTC at cold wallets, which I keep for the future. I've got another part to trade a bit with, for example to trade with altcoins and hope for some profit by doing that (not really successfull the lasts weeks, but I really was earlier) and i've got a small part which I USE. With this part I buy things.           I buy things from webshops which allow you to pay with Bitcoin, and I buy stuff on this forum. For example Steam codes, that works really well and fast Smiley.

{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!}

-> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <-
wobber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:49:05 PM
 #4

That is biggest problem of BitCoin, people don't look at it as a money to use it, but as a treasury to keep for rainy days.


Money do work as a store of value. Fiat doesn't.

If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
uhoh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Circle gets the Square


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:52:23 PM
 #5

There's another post on reddit today of someone who had 35 BTC stolen from "secure" wallets.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/

Certainly it seems like this guy knew what he was doing, but still somehow managed to get his BTC stolen....

I myself have taken all my bitcoins off of coinbase except for small amount. Except for a few donations, I haven't spent any this year.
I'm wondering, if investors put most of their bitcoins in cold storage (and subsequently, not use them for currency), what will be the result?

On one hand, they become more rare and they are held more tightly, which would seem to make them more valuable. On the other hand, they won't be used very much, which might mean they don't have as much value.
I'm not sure what to conclude. There are a lot of very smart people here and I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

 

Definitely wasn't secure, just another good reminder not to use untrusted sites with rubbish entropy to generate wallets. Sad though, I feel for the guy. Armory Armory Armory...
uhoh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Circle gets the Square


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 09:03:05 PM
 #6

There's another post on reddit today of someone who had 35 BTC stolen from "secure" wallets.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/

Certainly it seems like this guy knew what he was doing, but still somehow managed to get his BTC stolen....

I myself have taken all my bitcoins off of coinbase except for small amount. Except for a few donations, I haven't spent any this year.
I'm wondering, if investors put most of their bitcoins in cold storage (and subsequently, not use them for currency), what will be the result?

On one hand, they become more rare and they are held more tightly, which would seem to make them more valuable. On the other hand, they won't be used very much, which might mean they don't have as much value.
I'm not sure what to conclude. There are a lot of very smart people here and I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

 

Definitely wasn't secure, just another good reminder not to use untrusted sites with rubbish entropy to generate wallets. Sad though, I feel for the guy. Armory Armory Armory...

Is bitaddress.org safe though??

bitaddress.org is properly implemented. Still wouldn't personally trust 35BTC to it though unless it was generated offline.
Cubic Earth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 09:47:31 PM
 #7

Is bitaddress.org safe though??

Personally, I don't consider any mainstream computer-implemented random number generators to be secure.  That includes bitaddress.org's built in entropy source.  My solution is to mix in my own entropy, at about 10% - 15%.  What does that look like in practice?  I accept the private keys that are supposedly randomly generated, make a few of my own 'random' modifications, swapping out 5 - 10 characters, and then turn that new private key into an address.

And, it can help to double or triple check the address derivation was carried out correctly.  Feel free to import your custom private key into different pieces of software and make sure they all give the same result.
buzzlight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:52:59 PM
 #8

Sorry for off topic, but is there a definitive cold storage tutorial somewhere?
uhoh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Circle gets the Square


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:57:09 PM
 #9

Sorry for off topic, but is there a definitive cold storage tutorial somewhere?

This one is quite good for armory if you have a dedicated offline machine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGvrai3JxxI
Hyena
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2014, 10:57:50 PM
 #10

When I attempted my first cold storage I was not aware that all the balance on the address must be spent even if the slightest amount from that address is transferred to some other address. This nearly costed me all my bitcoins because I was about to delete the wallet immediately after testing if the cold storage address really works (by sending 0.0001). You can definitely shoot yourself in the leg when messing around with cold storages.

★★★ CryptoGraffiti.info ★★★ Hidden Messages Found from the Block Chain (Thread)
bitcoinsrus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:58:01 PM
 #11

Sorry for off topic, but is there a definitive cold storage tutorial somewhere?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1uefzJJ6nM
he uses bitaddress.org (not sure if you are willing to take the risk)

or do what uhoh and cubic earth said above (offline storage)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0cGvUFBNEQ
this guy is very good, watch the entire video, he does ubuntu etc (takes more time, but is much more secure)
h0lybyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 511


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:58:10 PM
 #12

tl;dr -> Dont fucking use  brainwallet.org.

Furthermore, BobAlison nailed the reasoning.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/cihsovm

Quote
It looks like brainwallet.org still uses JavaScript's Math.random, which is known to be cryptographically insecure:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5651789/is-math-random-cryptographically-secure[1]

See the randomBytes function in http://brainwallet.org/js/bitcoinjs-min.js[2] - reformatting a little:
randomBytes: function (e) {
  for (var t=[]; e>0; e--) {
    t.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 256));
    return t;
  }
}

It's up to the browser to decide how to implement Math.random. So it could be helpful to know the browser you used should someone want to follow up forensically.
This should be a wakeup call to anyone who relies on private keys generated though brainwallet.org or an insecure random number generator.
That said, how did you store your private keys? There are many ways they can fall into the wrong hands, both electronically and physically. Also, it's possible to leak information when spending. Did you by any chance spend from one or more wallets made the same way?
EcuaMobi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:03:47 PM
 #13

Wow!

All those coins were returned to the rightful owner:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/cihxnwj

But that was a great lesson  Cheesy

Edit: It's absolutely required to use external entropy to generate truly random data, like bitaddress and other do.
uhoh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Circle gets the Square


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:10:41 PM
 #14

Wow!

All those coins were returned to the rightful owner:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/295las/35_of_my_btc_gone_pc_not_compromised/cihxnwj

But that was a great lesson  Cheesy

Edit: It's absolutely required to use external entropy to generate truly random data, like bitaddress and other do.


WOW! Top man!
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:10:55 PM
 #15

Offline electrum install with a watch-wallet on your online machine. Full access to your financial info while at the same time keeping them physically secure.

As for online wallets, I don't use them, but I will eventually have funds on Kraken when the price starts going up. They allow the use of Yubikey (physical token required to log in), so are likely more secure than my hot multibit wallet.

Look inside yourself, and you will see that you are the bubble.
BTCfan1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:12:02 PM
 #16

That is biggest problem of BitCoin, people don't look at it as a money to use it, but as a treasury to keep for rainy days.


well it's definitely true of people in this sub-forum Smiley
wobber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:53:17 PM
 #17

When I attempted my first cold storage I was not aware that all the balance on the address must be spent even if the slightest amount from that address is transferred to some other address. This nearly costed me all my bitcoins because I was about to delete the wallet immediately after testing if the cold storage address really works (by sending 0.0001). You can definitely shoot yourself in the leg when messing around with cold storages.

What do you mean? Care to explain pls?

If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:54:48 PM
 #18

When I attempted my first cold storage I was not aware that all the balance on the address must be spent even if the slightest amount from that address is transferred to some other address. This nearly costed me all my bitcoins because I was about to delete the wallet immediately after testing if the cold storage address really works (by sending 0.0001). You can definitely shoot yourself in the leg when messing around with cold storages.

What do you mean? Care to explain pls?

The change address thing https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change
wobber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:57:01 PM
 #19

When I attempted my first cold storage I was not aware that all the balance on the address must be spent even if the slightest amount from that address is transferred to some other address. This nearly costed me all my bitcoins because I was about to delete the wallet immediately after testing if the cold storage address really works (by sending 0.0001). You can definitely shoot yourself in the leg when messing around with cold storages.

What do you mean? Care to explain pls?

The change address thing https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change

Oh, yea, that thing. Thanks

LE: But that applies only to Armory right? I mean, if you backup your wallet.dat you're safe.

If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
DannyElfman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 29, 2014, 01:59:32 AM
 #20

That is biggest problem of BitCoin, people don't look at it as a money to use it, but as a treasury to keep for rainy days.

Since bitcoin is deflationary they use it as a speculative tool to increasing their wealth in terms of fiat.

There is little way around this issue.

This spot for rent.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!