Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 05:58:21 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: GHASH.IO + DISCUS FISH >>>51% Possible to death bitcoin?  (Read 2222 times)
ThomasCrowne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

★☆★ 777Coin - The Exciting Bitco


View Profile
July 02, 2014, 05:52:25 AM
 #21

Jesus man, the ghash panic was all ready over the top. Why are we looking for things to scare ourselves with? Just stop all ready.
Hey man...gotta keep the FUDsicles fresh dude!  :p

cenixentor (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 02, 2014, 08:40:05 AM
 #22

Jesus man, the ghash panic was all ready over the top. Why are we looking for things to scare ourselves with? Just stop all ready.
Hey man...gotta keep the FUDsicles fresh dude!  :p

SHHHHHHHHHH
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2014, 08:49:25 AM
 #23

I think it would be very easy to kill bitcoin and lose all our money as the currency... Cry Cry

https://i.imgur.com/LwVr4Tg.png

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/16/bitcoin-currency-destroyed-51-attack-ghash-io

welcome noob  Smiley

Grinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1284
Merit: 1001


View Profile
July 02, 2014, 08:51:10 AM
 #24

Doing a 51% attack is like shooting yourself in the face. You get absolutely nothing out of it. If you control enough hashing power to perform that, why destroy the very thing that's making you money?

By denying every other miner any profits you can almost double the bitcoin income. This will make other miners give up, and then you can gradually turn off some of the miners and save cost. The risk for this is already very high but it doesn't seem to influenced the price. It's hard to tell if this is because the majority is in denial about it or just doesn't care. If it's the latter it means it would be very profitable.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2014, 08:51:29 AM
 #25

Yet Theymos decided to remove restrictions.  Cheesy

Doing a 51% attack is like shooting yourself in the face. You get absolutely nothing out of it. If you control enough hashing power to perform that, why destroy the very thing that's making you money?

By denying every other miner any profits you can almost double the bitcoin income. This will make other miners give up, and then you can gradually turn off some of the miners and save cost. The risk for this is already very high but it doesn't seem to influenced the price. It's hard to tell if this is because the majority is in denial about it or just doesn't care. If it's the latter it means it would be very profitable.
In other words, you would collapse the market and earn $00.  Wink

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
haploid23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1002



View Profile WWW
July 02, 2014, 09:06:41 AM
 #26

OP, welcome to last month. You missed the drama about this, is that why you bring it up again?

Grinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1284
Merit: 1001


View Profile
July 02, 2014, 09:30:30 AM
 #27

In other words, you would collapse the market and earn $00.  Wink

I agree that those are completely different words, with a completely different meaning from what I said.
DannyElfman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 03, 2014, 04:38:30 AM
 #28

-snip-
Doing a 51% attack is like shooting yourself in the face. You get absolutely nothing out of it. If you control enough hashing power to perform that, why destroy the very thing that's making you money?

By denying every other miner any profits you can almost double the bitcoin income. This will make other miners give up, and then you can gradually turn off some of the miners and save cost. The risk for this is already very high but it doesn't seem to influenced the price. It's hard to tell if this is because the majority is in denial about it or just doesn't care. If it's the latter it means it would be very profitable.
In other words, you would collapse the market and earn $00.  Wink
What people are afraid of is that an attacker would have something other then a financial motivation to launch an attack. 

This spot for rent.
CoolBliss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 07, 2014, 09:01:17 AM
 #29

Very few facts in the Guardian article
cenixentor (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 08, 2014, 10:39:05 AM
 #30

UPPPP
DannyElfman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 02:52:55 AM
 #31

Very few facts in the Guardian article
I don't think the reporters at the guardian truly understand bitcoin at this level to be able to accurately report it in a way that the average person could understand

This spot for rent.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!