Bitcoin Forum
April 18, 2024, 05:35:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Last 6 month were ... almost stable  (Read 2642 times)
ripper234 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2012, 10:54:11 AM
 #1

Take a look at the last 6 months:








BTC price were "almost stable". I know it's funny saying that when we had 350% price swings, from a low of almost $2 to a high of about $7. But in BTC terms, that's "almost stable".


Compare that to the 6 months before that




A low of 80 cents, a high of $32, ended at around $7, that's about 4000% end-to-end volatility.


Of course, this tells nothing of the future.

A little theory: Increased stability --> Good for BTC economy, shows public trust in BTC --> rising BTC prices --> decreased stability --> ... ?

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
1713418552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713418552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713418552
Reply with quote  #2

1713418552
Report to moderator
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713418552
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713418552

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713418552
Reply with quote  #2

1713418552
Report to moderator
waveaddict
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 02:57:12 PM
 #2

"A little theory: Increased stability -> Good for BTC economy, shows public trust in BTC -> rising BTC prices -> decreased stability -> ... ?"

Increasing the price of bitcoin will bring about more attention which will bring in more people which will finally force bitcoin to its actual price discovery (what it should be worth if the general public started using it)

Why do you think more people started buying gold? ... (hint) it wasn't because the price of gold flat-lined or went down  Wink


muyuu
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:01:37 PM
 #3

BTC price were "almost stable". I know it's funny saying that when we had 350% price swings, from a low of almost $2 to a high of about $7. But in BTC terms, that's "almost stable".

Lulz.

So BTC is stable because... because it was even more unstable before?  Grin

That's a good sales pitch: "bitcoin is stable!*1"

*1 : stability defined as price swings around 350%. Could be more. Terms apply.

GPG ID: 7294199D - OTC ID: muyuu (470F97EB7294199D)
forum tea fund BTC 1Epv7KHbNjYzqYVhTCgXWYhGSkv7BuKGEU DOGE DF1eTJ2vsxjHpmmbKu9jpqsrg5uyQLWksM CAP F1MzvmmHwP2UhFq82NQT7qDU9NQ8oQbtkQ
ripper234 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2012, 03:06:14 PM
 #4

"A little theory: Increased stability -> Good for BTC economy, shows public trust in BTC -> rising BTC prices -> decreased stability -> ... ?"

Increasing the price of bitcoin will bring about more attention which will bring in more people which will finally force bitcoin to its actual price discovery (what it should be worth if the general public started using it)

Why do you think more people started buying gold? ... (hint) it wasn't because the price of gold flat-lined or went down  Wink

All I'm saying is that there will be Bitcoin Bubble 2.0 (and probablly 3.0+) before getting to the "real" stable price.
If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months, this fact would attract more speculators and a bubble to $100+ will form, which will then quickly deflate to $20, etc...

Within a few (5-10) years, all these ups and downs should calm down, and either 1 BTC will be less than 10 cents, or at least $1000. My hunch is that the volatility in the next 6 months will be higher than the last 6 months.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:08:59 PM
 #5

If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months
Yeah right. Cheesy
proudhon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1311



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:23:25 PM
 #6

If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months
Yeah right. Cheesy

If bitcoin jumped up to $50 I know I wouldn't be able to get to the sell button fast enough and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  My point is, a jump like that is not sustainable, as we've already seen.

Bitcoin Fact: the price of bitcoin will not be greater than $70k for more than 25 consecutive days at any point in the rest of recorded human history.
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:25:23 PM
 #7

If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months
Yeah right. Cheesy

If bitcoin jumped up to $50 I know I wouldn't be able to get to the sell button fast enough and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  My point is, a jump like that is not sustainable, as we've already seen.
BUT BRUCE SAID $100!
ripper234 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2012, 03:50:05 PM
 #8

If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months
Yeah right. Cheesy

If bitcoin jumped up to $50 I know I wouldn't be able to get to the sell button fast enough and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  My point is, a jump like that is not sustainable, as we've already seen.

And if Amazon or Google dropped a bomb and announced, out of the blue, that they will be integrating Amazon into their services?
Something like this could spike prices well above $100.

I'm not saying it's likely in the near future, I have little info on the inner workings of Amazon & Google. My point is that a major news event could boost prices a lot higher than the current rate.

Replace Amazon/Google with some smaller company for a smaller increase in BTC prices. E.g. Quora decides to switch from their internal credit system to Bitcoin.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:52:56 PM
 #9

The Google chairman himself said they did not want to create a p2p currency like Bitcoin due to the legal troubles.

Noone anyone nearly established will accept Bitcoins anytime soon. They will only do so when they are overwhelmingly forced to by demand.
ripper234 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2012, 04:13:45 PM
 #10

the bitcoin massive acceptance CAN happen in a zone or state where tax collection is hard to enforce, if the tax collection is enforce there is almost no point in accepting bitcoins

The point in accepting Bitcoin is not tax evasion, it's reduced fees from payment processors and credit card companies, and increased anonymity.

Note that if I happened to be a manager of a mid-large company, and would happen to be a personal Bitcoin believer, I'd think there's good business sense in being early adopters and not just waiting out.

"If we, BigCompanyFoo, accept Bitcoin now, Bitcoin prices are likely to rise considerably because of that, and other companies will follow suit. If we invest a nice sum of BTC, and then make the announcement that we'll accept Bitcoin, we'll make a lot of money for our shareholders in the process, regardless of any future profits from Bitcoin being inherently more efficient than other payment processors".

The business sense sounds like a ponzi-scheme, but it might make sense. Granted, it's not the kind of decisions I imagine most executives at most mid-large companies ever making ... its too risky at this point.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
March 07, 2012, 04:31:48 PM
 #11

cash in hand is cheaper
credit card is cheaper, plz don't tell me that you only look at direct fees
- the client need a smart phone
- a internet connection plan
- a bitcoin client on the phone or a payment processor account
- accepts to pay the same value in USD/EUR using bitcoins but losing the ability to charge back
- needs to know that is doing

if the buyer is a eCommerce site not a shop then instead of a phone he need a PC

so what are the cost of using bitcoins instead of credit card ? and all the burden are shifted on the buyer


This is why we need like a distributed (as opposed to central) payment processor, perhaps something incentivized that miners could run along side mining.  So that when someone goes to www.bitcoin.org to get started, they no longer download a client -- they just sign up and a card will be sent to them that spends their BTC.  And their wallet would be securely stored on the distributed processor.  I'm sure it will be hella hax0r3d at first but it is what needs to happen.

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
jojkaart
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2012, 07:32:53 PM
 #12

cash in hand is cheaper
credit card is cheaper, plz don't tell me that you only look at direct fees
- the client need a smart phone
- a internet connection plan
- a bitcoin client on the phone or a payment processor account
- accepts to pay the same value in USD/EUR using bitcoins but losing the ability to charge back
- needs to know that is doing

if the buyer is a eCommerce site not a shop then instead of a phone he need a PC

so what are the cost of using bitcoins instead of credit card ? and all the burden are shifted on the buyer


That is not quite correct. There is a way to use bitcoins much like cash that only requires the customer to carry pieces of paper. Of course, those pieces of paper need to come from somewhere but that's the case with cash too.

The method is simple. You just have pieces of paper that have bitcoin private keys printed on them (ideally QR codes too) and have someone transfer bitcoins into them in whatever amounts desired. Then, at the shop, you just hand over the paper, they scan it, sweep the coins and you're done.
ArticMine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050


Monero Core Team


View Profile
March 17, 2012, 07:44:42 PM
 #13

cash in hand is cheaper
credit card is cheaper, plz don't tell me that you only look at direct fees
- the client need a smart phone
- a internet connection plan
- a bitcoin client on the phone or a payment processor account
- accepts to pay the same value in USD/EUR using bitcoins but losing the ability to charge back
- needs to know that is doing

if the buyer is a eCommerce site not a shop then instead of a phone he need a PC

so what are the cost of using bitcoins instead of credit card ? and all the burden are shifted on the buyer


What if the customer does not have a credit card or bank account and wishes to purchase something online? For in person transactions cash is the option. But what options exist online on a worldwide basis in this case other than Bitcoin?

By the way people without credit cards or bank accounts are a very significant proportion of the population.

Concerned that blockchain bloat will lead to centralization? Storing less than 4 GB of data once required the budget of a superpower and a warehouse full of punched cards. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/IBM_card_storage.NARA.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card
jojkaart
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2012, 09:39:44 PM
 #14

That is not quite correct. There is a way to use bitcoins much like cash that only requires the customer to carry pieces of paper. Of course, those pieces of paper need to come from somewhere but that's the case with cash too.

The method is simple. You just have pieces of paper that have bitcoin private keys printed on them (ideally QR codes too) and have someone transfer bitcoins into them in whatever amounts desired. Then, at the shop, you just hand over the paper, they scan it, sweep the coins and you're done.
in this thread shops have qr reader for bitcoins and geek cashiers, plz go on this world seams awesome, where is the portal to this dimension i want to go there 

Way to run off in a completely unrelated dimension you have there. I merely corrected your misconception that the customer needs expensive equipment to use bitcoins. The dream world where all shops accept bitcoins is still quite far away from reality, unfortunately.

P.S. I must remark that your way of trying to paint me as someone living in a dreamworld is extremely disrespectful. Unless you're going to answer with a respectful tone, you might as well not bother.
evoorhees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1021


Democracy is the original 51% attack


View Profile
March 17, 2012, 10:01:41 PM
 #15

If Bitcoin now jumped to $50 and stayed there for a few months
Yeah right. Cheesy

If bitcoin jumped up to $50 I know I wouldn't be able to get to the sell button fast enough and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  My point is, a jump like that is not sustainable, as we've already seen.

A 10x jump is not sustainable?  Wasn't Bitcoin at $.05 for a while, and then hit $.50? 10x.  Oh, and then didn't it hit $5? Another 10x. Since the beginning of last year we already jumped over 10x and have remained quite stable in the $4-$6 range.
PulsedMedia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 402
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2012, 10:04:47 PM
 #16

cash in hand is cheaper
credit card is cheaper, plz don't tell me that you only look at direct fees
- the client need a smart phone
- a internet connection plan
- a bitcoin client on the phone or a payment processor account
- accepts to pay the same value in USD/EUR using bitcoins but losing the ability to charge back
- needs to know that is doing

if the buyer is a eCommerce site not a shop then instead of a phone he need a PC

so what are the cost of using bitcoins instead of credit card ? and all the burden are shifted on the buyer


WOW! You really don't know what you are talking about.
CC might be cheap for the consumer, but not the merchant!
I operate a small business and pay so much in PP fees it would hire 1 guy fulltime! This with significantly lower than CC processing fees. Changing to direct CC processing now would double up the cost probably.

Right now Bitcoin mostly matters for online purchases, anyone looking to make online purchases does not need any additional investment to utilize Bitcoin. NADA.
Only investment is a little bit of time to install bitcoin client, register on Mt.Gox and buy bitcoins.

Chargebacks are an extreme cost at the merchant side, and this extreme cost is added directly to the end product costs for honest customers. Single chargeback can loose the merchant thousands of euros, atleast in the case of Paypal where paypal might take the chargeback amount + another time the chargeback amount as reserve for costs of handling the chargeback. Even if you disputed successfully the chargeback there is upto 15% cost.

Now even at 7.5% cost, even if 0.1% customers do chargeback and you successfully dispute it 100% of the time, is 7.5%+human resources added to the final product price.

Computers are dead cheap nowadays anyways, 150-200€ for cheapest netbooks, new Smiley
400€ for full desktop.
That is less than any serious business would pay in TRX fees in any given month. Nevermind if they actually process the CC fees themselves there is also reserves etc. holding a % for atleast months, or for the lifetime of the merchant account.

Payment processing is currently *very expensive*, for example for us it accounts for roughly 6% of total costs! More than our marketing budget ffs.

If we'd solely use bitcoin, buyer would benefit:
 - At the very least 3% average lower service price, more likely in the 15% area (for 100% margin service, 1euro saved in costs lowers end price 2euros, 25% margin service price will likely stay the same)
 - No PP Dilemnas, getting verified etc.
 - No random payment reversals with PP and causing need to submit extra info to PP for validation
 - No sending utility bills, drivers license pictures etc.
 - Not having to keep a valid CC on file @ PP to be charged anytime for whatever reason PP decides
 - Not having the chance of PP employee stealing your CC information (In the past even cleaners had access to CC information)
 - No random accounts freezings
 - No waiting always PP to load forever (for finns logging in might take 3-7minutes, amazing it doesn't hit timeout)
 - Fast transaction histories if you need it
 - Ability to purchase sub-1$ priced services (PP Charge minimum 0.39$ TRX fee), in practice availability of good value sub-5$ services. Anything below 5$ and the TRX fee margin becomes too high
 - Some long term payment discounts on low priced services are transferred to even monthly subscriptions (TRX fee minimums)
 - Anyone could use our service, as in practice Bitcoin is available to any nationality without restrictions (Unlike PP)

Many have asked us to support WU, but we'd have to charge 40-60€ per transaction for using WU Sad


http://PulsedMedia.com - Semidedicated rTorrent seedboxes
PulsedMedia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 402
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2012, 11:43:47 PM
 #17

@PulsedMedia
i think you dint get my point view correctly and you are overreacting

you accept payments on what users have not on what you want, until customers wont have a incentive to use bitcoins instead of CC they wont use it  no matter how many sticker/banners with bitcoins accepted here you will put

for me to use BTC instead of CC there is needed to be about 20-25% discount between USD/EUR cost and BTC cost

also i dont know where you have this business but where i am the bank take 0.68% with a minimum 30 eur per moth if total volume goes over 2000 eur per month the 30 minimum fee is removed
First of all, you should learn a little bit of english, if you want anyone to understand you.

Wire transfers are FREE here. I'm talking about PP and CC payments, you said CC is far superior. No one was talking about wire transfers.

Currently users have no need for BTC because so few places accept BTC. We accept on manual request, but only manual as long as there isn't a WHMCS module i'm confident enough with. At this point we have to charge a little bit extra for BTC payment due to it's volatility.

You clearly have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Were are right now in a state where there is NO demand for BTC payments from merchant point of view, because users see no supply.
As soon as there is a little bit more supply, users will adopt when they see the all around benefits. Stabilizing exchange rate will help there as well.

It's true however that the sole reason we accept PP is because by nature 97% of webhosting payments are via PP.
However, if it would be convenient for us we would push more for Alert Pay, and probably Liberty Reserve too, along with WebMoney and some Asian gateways, unfortunately, becoming a merchant with them has been made rather .... Annoying .... To say it very mildly.

If we would present all those choices, i would bet usage of PP would drop to around 40%-50%, mainly being US and UK customers. But at that point we would also add an extra fee for using PP, allowed by accepting Western Union with even heftier fee Wink At that point PP usage would plummet.
However, right now convenience trumps other benefits, managing a bunch of different payment methods can create a lot of extra burden on managing cash flow.

Did you know that PP TOS denies you right to charge extra fee for using PP *unless* you accept some other payment method as well with the same or higher fee?

PP is currently killing their supply side (merchants), so it's only matter of time supply for BTC services becomes great enough for mass adoption buy consumers (demand of BTC paid services).

So wake up, and get first some experience and knowledge about things you don't clearly understand the slightest bit.

http://PulsedMedia.com - Semidedicated rTorrent seedboxes
PulsedMedia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 402
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 18, 2012, 02:41:48 AM
 #18

i dint mentioned wire transfers lol, where did you read that ? banks provide you the only the payment widget like paypal does

Which happens as wire transfer behind the curtain OR is a very expensive merchant account for CC processing.
Just goes to show how little you know.

http://PulsedMedia.com - Semidedicated rTorrent seedboxes
PulsedMedia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 402
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 18, 2012, 09:14:03 PM
 #19

i dont know that details and i dont need to know them, i look from customer point of view and that is the only valid point of view

Ignorance is a bliss!

http://PulsedMedia.com - Semidedicated rTorrent seedboxes
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 20, 2012, 12:25:55 AM
 #20

Great stability Grin



GPG ID: 7294199D - OTC ID: muyuu (470F97EB7294199D)
forum tea fund BTC 1Epv7KHbNjYzqYVhTCgXWYhGSkv7BuKGEU DOGE DF1eTJ2vsxjHpmmbKu9jpqsrg5uyQLWksM CAP F1MzvmmHwP2UhFq82NQT7qDU9NQ8oQbtkQ
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!