[ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal

[whirlcoin]

I don't understand what is going on here. Rewards for bounties are so high and yet on this coin I put 5 CPUs and got just one block rated at 99.24WHRL. At such low diff I should find much much more blocks, but what's a point reward per block is too low. Can someone explain in simple words what is going on with block reward and why we can't find more blocks at this diff.

It would appear that a very large miner has jumped on and sent the difficulty very high. Hopefully we will get pools shortly

[Hix]

Compile miner
new error

Code:

configure.ac:6: error: version mismatch.  This is Automake 1.14.1,
configure.ac:6: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
configure.ac:6: comes from Automake 1.11.3.  You should recreate
configure.ac:6: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.
configure.ac:6: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated, and its use is discouraged.
configure.ac:6: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro instead,
configure.ac:6: and use '$(MKDIR_P)' instead of '$(mkdir_p)'in your Makefile.am files.
Makefile.am:12: warning: 'INCLUDES' is the old name for 'AM_CPPFLAGS' (or '*_CPPFLAGS')

so many trobles with this sources

[LuckyBtc]

Can't even find one block running from 1 hr now.We need a pool :/

[ocminer]

nodes ?

[mangodream]

Does it's better to mine into wallet with setgenerate parameter or with minerd ?

[whirlcoin]

nodes ?

All on sample config in OP

Does it's better to mine into wallet with setgenerate parameter or with minerd ?

I'd say minerd would be faster, but i could be wrong. They will be very similar anyway.

[vedran82]

Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.

[mangodream]

Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.

[busminer]

nodes ?

addnode=162.253.154.172
addnode=162.248.4.167
addnode=183.21.162.89
addnode=92.244.112.153
addnode=107.150.46.123
addnode=90.155.222.162
addnode=151.48.154.149
addnode=66.69.8.121

[baraba80]

0.5%, or 3.4 Million WHRL will be premined to support these bounties and others in the future.

200,000 WHRL: For GPU Miner
50,000 WHRL: For Increasing CPU Miner Performance
400,000 WHRL: For Implementing WhirlPool Anonymous System
200,000 WHRL: For Android Wallet
100,000 WHRL: For Online Wallet
50,000 WHRL: For Paper Wallet Generator
50,000 WHRL: For Block Explorer

WTF and I have like 300 from beginning with 3* I7   DEV you did somthing wrong!

[vedran82]

Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.

I lol'd

Anyways, bounties really DO seem strangely big compared to what we mined. 25 blocks so far, kinda funny, even compared to a simple node bounty!

[whirlcoin]

Now that i look back on it it does seem very bizarre that blocks are being found this slowly. I would have expected an enormous instamine, but evidently that did not occur

If you do the maths though, you'll find that approximately the right amount of blocks have been found to match almost exactly the 45 second block target!

[mangodream]

BTW i want a bounty for the new logo i made :

[whirlcoin]

BTW i want a bounty for the new logo i made :

That's beautiful! I think that may have to become the splash screen

[ocminer]

I've got a pool up:

https://whirl.suprnova.cc

We yet have to try if it finds blocks...

[agentneuron]

So.... How's that pool coming along?

[ocminer]

I've got a pool up:

https://whirl.suprnova.cc

We yet have to try if it finds blocks...

Mmh.. my cpuminer crashes with a "buffer overflow".. anyone got the same prob ?

[Mantiska]

I've got a pool up:

https://whirl.suprnova.cc

We yet have to try if it finds blocks...

Mmh.. my cpuminer crashes with a "buffer overflow".. anyone got the same prob ?

minerd running 4 minutes and still 0 shares :/
Added: 1 share found, but "Booo"

[ajeef]

I've got a pool up:

https://whirl.suprnova.cc

We yet have to try if it finds blocks...

Mmh.. my cpuminer crashes with a "buffer overflow".. anyone got the same prob ?

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[agentneuron]

connected and hashing. one boooooo

need some more mining power!

I've got a pool up:

https://whirl.suprnova.cc

We yet have to try if it finds blocks...