|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:19:10 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated I get this error [23:07:32] "/tmp/OCLjA2tNz.cl", line 98: catastrophic error: cannot open source file "sha2.cl" #include "sha2.cl"
+1 just remove it (the sha2.cl and the others except whirlpool.cl) I just updated github with a corrected version
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:23:34 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated whirlcoin.c:43:2: error: unknown type name ‘sph_blake512_context’ sph_blake512_context blake1;
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:26:45 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated whirlcoin.c:43:2: error: unknown type name ‘sph_blake512_context’ sph_blake512_context blake1;
github updated...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:27:08 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated I get this error [23:07:32] "/tmp/OCLjA2tNz.cl", line 98: catastrophic error: cannot open source file "sha2.cl" #include "sha2.cl"
+1 just remove it (the sha2.cl and the others except whirlpool.cl) I just updated github with a corrected version nope: [23:26:29] Started sgminer [23:26:30] Kernel whirlcoin is not really experimental. [23:26:30] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [23:26:30] "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl", line 127: error: function "DEC64LE" declared implicitly n0 = DEC64LE(block + 0); ^
1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation.
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:30:13 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated I get this error [23:07:32] "/tmp/OCLjA2tNz.cl", line 98: catastrophic error: cannot open source file "sha2.cl" #include "sha2.cl"
+1 just remove it (the sha2.cl and the others except whirlpool.cl) I just updated github with a corrected version nope: [23:26:29] Started sgminer [23:26:30] Kernel whirlcoin is not really experimental. [23:26:30] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [23:26:30] "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl", line 127: error: function "DEC64LE" declared implicitly n0 = DEC64LE(block + 0); ^
1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation. +1
|
|
|
|
Atrides
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:31:51 PM |
|
whirlcoin.c:43:2: error: unknown type name ‘sph_blake512_context’ sph_blake512_context blake1;
Who next?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:34:20 PM |
|
whirlcoin.c:43:2: error: unknown type name ‘sph_blake512_context’ sph_blake512_context blake1;
Who next? sorry I have so many different version... that I am a bit lost...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:36:52 PM |
|
sgminer with whirlpool (don't use fresh, it is currently broken as I was testing whirlcoin there...) https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod sgminer --kernel whirlcoin sorry no binaries... problem to solve before with linux release of ccminer btw why did you use whirlpool1 ? it is called "old1" , it means deprecated I get this error [23:07:32] "/tmp/OCLjA2tNz.cl", line 98: catastrophic error: cannot open source file "sha2.cl" #include "sha2.cl"
+1 just remove it (the sha2.cl and the others except whirlpool.cl) I just updated github with a corrected version nope: [23:26:29] Started sgminer [23:26:30] Kernel whirlcoin is not really experimental. [23:26:30] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [23:26:30] "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl", line 127: error: function "DEC64LE" declared implicitly n0 = DEC64LE(block + 0); ^
1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCLQosMsX.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation. +1 #define SWAP4(x) as_uint(as_uchar4(x).wzyx) #define SWAP8(x) as_ulong(as_uchar8(x).s76543210)
#if SPH_BIG_ENDIAN #define DEC64LE(x) (x) #define DEC64BE(x) (*(const __global sph_u64 *) (x)); #else #define DEC64LE(x) SWAP8(x) #define DEC64BE(x) SWAP8(*(const __global sph_u64 *) (x)); #endif
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:41:23 PM |
|
updated (updating... actually)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:44:47 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:50:40 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad I am getting 4MHash/s with a R9 290x (I am a bit surprised by the 350kh/s) It requires the 14.6 amd drivers
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:51:27 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad I am getting 4MHash/s with a R9 290x (I am a bit surprised by the 350kh/s) nope still 350 kh/s .. and only my first from three cards is recognized.. never had such problems before.. strange
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:53:22 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad I am getting 4MHash/s with a R9 290x (I am a bit surprised by the 350kh/s) It require the 14.6 amd drivers Ssht, don't talk that loud. Don't tell them so us Nvidia miners still have a chance. Btw, my gtx760 is doing around 6-6.5MH/s, my 750tis only 4-4.5MH/s each I'm not used to this difference Great work djm, as always
|
|
|
|
whirlcoin (OP)
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:53:29 PM |
|
I can now confirm the Windows CPUminer works with pools - probably a bit late
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:54:23 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad I am getting 4MHash/s with a R9 290x (I am a bit surprised by the 350kh/s) It requires the 14.6 amd drivers yes, i'm on the latest beta drivers
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
whirlcoin (OP)
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:55:34 PM |
|
I'll offer another 20000 for someone with a decent-ly compiled gpu-miner for amd on windows & source, to get everyone on a level field
|
|
|
|
majsta
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:56:55 PM |
|
I have compiled GPU miner for AMD for win. Aldo temperatures are not detected but it is not important for me anyway.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 21, 2014, 09:57:25 PM |
|
lol performance is cool.. 350 kH/s from a R9 280x I'll do a fresh compile.. cant be so bad I am getting 4MHash/s with a R9 290x (I am a bit surprised by the 350kh/s) It require the 14.6 amd drivers Ssht, don't talk that loud. Don't tell them so us Nvidia miners still have a chance. Btw, my gtx760 is doing around 6-6.5MH/s, my 750tis only 4-4.5MH/s each I'm not used to this difference Great work djm, as always actually the performance of the nvidia are way better... (I don't think that the multikernel is a good idea here for the amd with the 8 giant ulonglong vectors) @ocminer I am currently running with the 14.7 drivers, without any problem at 4.18MHash/s average. what intensity are you using ? (I use 20)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|