Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 01:11:21 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal  (Read 118055 times)
Legoasaurus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 01, 2014, 11:14:48 AM
 #781

i agree, it would be really good to get this coin on poloniex!!
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
August 01, 2014, 11:26:42 AM
 #782

i think this will end like x14 and x17
whirlcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 111


View Profile
August 01, 2014, 11:40:28 AM
 #783

Poloniex is back up now, hopefully we'll be on soon
SeaSoul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 01, 2014, 02:19:48 PM
 #784

Poloniex is back up now, hopefully we'll be on soon
Wait poloniex!
auy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 01, 2014, 03:25:47 PM
 #785

Wait poloniex! Grin
louiedave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 12:45:58 PM
 #786

Thread almost seem so quiet... Is the coin dead? Sad
adamandeve
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

@AltcoinAdam


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2014, 12:47:49 PM
 #787

Interesting!


Can someone tell me how Whirlpool compares against X11, NIST5, or Blake-256 ?

Especially in terms of energy efficiency, power consumption, and temperatures?


Curious,
Adam

whirlcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 111


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 01:16:12 PM
 #788

Interesting!


Can someone tell me how Whirlpool compares against X11, NIST5, or Blake-256 ?

Especially in terms of energy efficiency, power consumption, and temperatures?


Curious,
Adam

From what I've checked, with my 6870 and 260x, power consumption with whirlpool is lowest (not by much), and it runs at similar temps to X11, maybe a little bit better
unitedminers
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 241
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 02:00:01 PM
Last edit: August 02, 2014, 04:27:23 PM by unitedminers
 #789

Interesting!


Can someone tell me how Whirlpool compares against X11, NIST5, or Blake-256 ?

Especially in terms of energy efficiency, power consumption, and temperatures?


Curious,
Adam

From what I've checked, with my 6870 and 260x, power consumption with whirlpool is lowest (not by much), and it runs at similar temps to X11, maybe a little bit better

Mining your coin makes fun because of these facts, but it's the most fun with my Nvidia GTX 750 Ti (+CPU +SSD) at 90 watts and 4300 kHs!

Keep us updated and a homepage would be fine, too Smiley
mmmaybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 02, 2014, 04:06:47 PM
 #790

This coin needs a more acknowledged exchange.

Legoasaurus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 10:22:25 PM
 #791

mmmaybe it'll get on poloniex soon! see waht I did there?
mmmaybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 02, 2014, 10:44:17 PM
 #792

mmmaybe it'll get on poloniex soon! see waht I did there?

 Grin

Ofenkaese
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 09:09:20 AM
 #793

would also love to see whirl  trading on poloniex.
Legoasaurus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 11:11:23 AM
 #794

whirl will be on poloniex soon evryone! dont give up hope!!!
yuio
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 06:05:21 PM
 #795

Polonex...
Why not just trade at swisscex and cryptoine?
mmmaybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 03, 2014, 06:27:42 PM
 #796

Polonex...
Why not just trade at swisscex ?

Yeah, Polo might just be too hard now to get on, we need to build some volume.


louiedave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 11:51:44 PM
 #797

Polonex...
Why not just trade at swisscex ?

Yeah, Polo might just be too hard now to get on, we need to build some volume.


The reason is IMO people don't trust does two exchanges... better listed on c-cex.com if that so...
numanoid
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1148


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 05:46:03 AM
 #798

Polonex...
Why not just trade at swisscex and cryptoine?

I've never heard of these exchanges before and don't know if they're trustworthy. I'm sure there are many who agree with me.  On top of that, visibility at a popular/established exchange can bring more people into the coin, potentially raising its value.

Most likely we're just trading to each other on these 2 exchanges.  May as well skip the middle man.  Make me an offer on my coins.. Smiley

nuggetbram
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 326
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 07:26:12 AM
 #799

Don't worry, if he's said they are talking with Poloniex it will be up soon. No exchange would ask the dev about adding a coin and then not. It'll be there soon, running an exchange is hard work and new coins aren't on the top of their agenda.
silverduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 09:33:40 AM
 #800

Polonex...
Why not just trade at swisscex ?

Yeah, Polo might just be too hard now to get on, we need to build some volume.


The reason is IMO people don't trust does two exchanges... better listed on c-cex.com if that so...

c-cex wants 1 btc to get it listed :s
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!