Bitcoin Forum
January 21, 2017, 04:24:22 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: hashkill - testing bitcoin miner plugin  (Read 86175 times)
gat3way
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 06:59:41 AM
 #361

Quote
I found that your nice tool stalls when it looses connectivity.

If you don't define a pool list text file (and use -f file) on connection loss, it sleeps for 20-30 seconds then retries. If you have defined a pool list file, it just tries the next one without sleeping.


Quote
It'd also be nice to have a socket spawn from hashkill that allows reading of basic program statistics, so we can develop our tools around yours.

This is not supported, however the bitcoin plugin exports statistics in a text file in json format (in ~/.hashkill/bitcoin.json).


Quote
It'd also be awesome if hashkill had a switch to show all avail plugins

Use hashkill-gpu -p

Quote
I've been searching for some tool that can use a GPU to get around salted MD5 ($1$, ya know:-D).

MD5(Unix) is not supported at present on GPUs. It is on CPUs though. The only tool I know of that supports it on GPUs is oclhashcat+

Quote
Still the question remains whether hashkill has native CUDA support.

No CUDA support, just OpenCL. Yes, CUDA tends to be faster, but I don't really care about 5-10% performance gains on NVidia platforms that require the whole codebase to be rewritten. If it was AMD, I would do that, but NVidia hardware just sucks in terms of integer ops. It's a waste of money and electricity for hash cracking, even when huge hashlists are to be cracked.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1484972662
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484972662

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484972662
Reply with quote  #2

1484972662
Report to moderator
M4v3R
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 607



View Profile
July 04, 2011, 07:39:58 AM
 #362

Hi,

I've tried hashkill for the first time today, but unfortunately it doesn't quite work well for me (it works at 1/3 GPU capacity only):



Quote from: uname
Linux tifa 2.6.35-30-server #54-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 7 20:13:05 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Quote from: command
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/ati-stream-sdk-v2.2-lnx64/lib/x86_64/ hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin -f pools -D -G4

SDK version: 2.2
Catalyst version: 10.2

Any ideas why?

Edit: I use SDK 2.1 in my miners because 2.2 and newer for some reason don't work for me. And 2.1 doesn't work with hashkill, I get the clBuildProgram error.
figvam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 07:42:54 AM
 #363

Something's wrong with Fedora 14, 2.1 SDK and 4650. It used to work in some previous version.
Quote
[hashkill] Version 0.2.5
[hashkill] Plugin 'bitcoin' loaded successfully
[hashkill] Found GPU device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. - ATI RV730
[hashkill] Using 4xxx codepath
[hashkill] GPU0: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 [busy:0%] [temp:4114C]
[hashkill] Temperature threshold set to 90 degrees C
[hashkill] This plugin supports GPU acceleration.
[hashkill] Initialized hash indexes
[hashkill] Initialized thread mutexes
[hashkill] Spawned worker threads
[hashkill] Successfully connected and authorized at mineco.in:3000
[hashkill] Compiling OpenCL kernel source (amd_bitcoin.cl)[error] (ocl_bitcoin.c:1209) clBuildProgram error (-11)
[hashkill] Attack took 0 seconds.
[hashkill] Bye bye Smiley
figvam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 07:45:37 AM
 #364

Running under strace:

open("/tmp/OCL1Dtk0m.log", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
_llseek(3, 0, [19367], SEEK_END)        = 0
_llseek(3, 0, [19367], SEEK_CUR)        = 0
_llseek(3, 0, [0 ], SEEK_SET)            = 0
read(3, "/tmp/OCL1Dtk0m.cl(107): error: b"..., 19367) = 19367


Looks like the OpenCL compilation log contained more descriptive error. Maybe output that error when compilation fails?
gat3way
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 09:18:34 AM
 #365

Any SDKs below 2.3 are not supported, sorry. They do not support OpenCL 1.1 features correctly and have significant problems with using multiple devices in a single process.

P.S if you chose to use 2.2 anyway, do not use -G4, but -G1. It should provide you better utilization.
antares
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
 #366

@gat3way
ok, so I see that hashkill is supposed to resume hashing. however I had 3 occurrances of a stalled hashkill today, each correspond with connectivity issues(I monitor load on my GPU and I just added monitoring my IP addresses)

It'd be also nice if you could add a wallet ID to your signature so we can donate to you to keep you doing your amazing work.
Last thing for now - I'd like to set up a mirror for hashkill, so people wont get stalled in case your site gets anavailable again - If that's ok with you
antares
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 11:54:11 AM
 #367

Quote
[hashkill] Spawned worker threads
[hashkill] Successfully connected and authorized at bitcoins.lc:8080
[hashkill] Compiling OpenCL kernel source (amd_bitcoin.cl)
[hashkill] Binary size: 349084
[hashkill] Doing BFI_INT magic...

Mining statistics...
Speed: 212 MHash/sec [proc: 16] [subm: 9] [stale: 0] [eff: 56%]
[error] (ocl_bitcoin.c:926) Statistics about that pool (bitcoins.lc) not supported.
GPU0: AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series  [busy:99%] [temp:74C]

Speed: 211 MHash/sec [proc: 298] [subm: 275] [stale: 29] [eff: 92%]     [error] (ocl_bitcoin.c:245) Long polling failure, will retry in 20s!
Speed: 212 MHash/sec [proc: 302] [subm: 275] [stale: 29] [eff: 91%]
Long polling: got new block!
Speed: 211 MHash/sec [proc: 334] [subm: 304] [stale: 30] [eff: 91%]
Long polling: got new block!
Speed: 0 MHash/sec [proc: 506] [subm: 460] [stale: 37] [eff: 90%]

this is what happens when hashkill gets killed.
figvam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 12:29:20 PM
 #368

Still slower than poclbm/phatk on HD 4650 and SDK 2.4:
hashkill 24Mhashes/sec
poclbm/phatk: 27-29Mhashes/sec

Interestingly minerd suffers from the same problem, with exactly the same hash rate numbers.
datguywhowanders
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112



View Profile
July 04, 2011, 08:09:29 PM
 #369

Has anyone tried this with either a 6950 or 6970, and if so, are they getting any gains over using poclbm or phoenix?

Donations Welcome: 163id7T8KZ6MevqT86DjrBF2kfCPrQsfZE
Tartarus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47


View Profile
July 05, 2011, 03:28:41 AM
 #370

Has anyone tried this with either a 6950 or 6970, and if so, are they getting any gains over using poclbm or phoenix?

On my 6950 I see the same rates as phoenix/poclbm+phatk, +/-1MHash.

Find the above useful?  Send tips to 1KjoJihf7GWHWeQFhDmaw4g7xorkmD13u
Dusty
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722


Libertas a calumnia


View Profile WWW
July 05, 2011, 12:05:04 PM
 #371

I tried latest release and the MH/sec seems faster, the problem is that I get 0% efficiency, with no good submitted shares.
I'm using SDK 2.4 and stock ati drivers from ubuntu 11.04, any hints?

Also, I would like to ask gat3way to please change the name of the file for every release because using the same name for different content causes a lot of problems for who uses proxy and makes difficult to trace the problem or benefits of every release.

Thanks!

Articoli bitcoin: Il portico dipinto
Dusty
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722


Libertas a calumnia


View Profile WWW
July 05, 2011, 09:05:03 PM
 #372

I forgot to tell that I'm using bitcoin.ls, and it's possible that the problem only exhibits with that pool?

Articoli bitcoin: Il portico dipinto
gat3way
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 07, 2011, 06:15:30 AM
 #373

Don't know, need to investigate.

Unfortunately my priorities are now shifted towards implementing some DES-based password hashing algorithms on GPUs, so I won't be able to work on the bitcoin plugin in the near future.
kripz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
July 07, 2011, 07:53:03 AM
 #374

open source it?

 Merged mining, free SMS notifications, PayPal payout and much more.
http://btcstats.net/sig/JZCODg2
gat3way
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 07, 2011, 08:58:44 AM
 #375

http://hashkill.sourceforge.net/
Dusty
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722


Libertas a calumnia


View Profile WWW
July 07, 2011, 03:26:23 PM
 #376

Great move, thanks!

Out of curiosity: is it possible to use hashkill to crack WEP passwords...?

Articoli bitcoin: Il portico dipinto
gat3way
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 07, 2011, 04:55:41 PM
 #377

No.
iamzill
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139


View Profile
July 07, 2011, 07:00:45 PM
 #378

Nice tool, but it cannot find one of my cards. I have two 5830s installed, both are being detected by Linux and ATI drivers:

Code:
04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 5800 Series (Cypress LE) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 036a
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 32
Memory at b0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at fe6c0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
I/O ports at b000 [size=256]
Expansion ROM at fe6a0000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: fglrx_pci
Kernel modules: fglrx, radeon

07:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 5800 Series (Cypress LE) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: PC Partner Limited Device 174b
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 76
Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at fe9c0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
Expansion ROM at fe9a0000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: fglrx_pci
Kernel modules: fglrx, radeon


Currently hashkill only detects the second card.

I'm assuming you have the device ID hardcoded somewhere?


Edit: Sorry, my bad. One of the card is detected by Linux but not by the ATI drivers. This is definitely not hashkill's fault. My apologies. Thanks for the great tool again.



SkipDaShu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


mini me


View Profile WWW
July 07, 2011, 07:41:26 PM
 #379

Nice tool, but it cannot find one of my cards. I have two 5830s installed, both are being detected by Linux and ATI drivers:

I have one mobo that does this with it's 2 x 5830's.  One boot only card 2 and only video on card 2 (even boot up bios screen).  One or two reboots and video moves to card 1 where it should be and Diablo can then use both cards.  Seems that something gets messed up on a soft reset.  Power off for 3 mins and it always comes up right.

I have another very similar machine, same OS, same drivers, same config files, both i7-87x 1156 sockets, different mobos and it never does this.  The one that gives me the problem is a MSI H55-GD65 (H55) the one that doesn't is a BioStar T5 XE (P55) mobo.

- da shu @ HeliOS (http://www.heliosinitiative.org/),
"A child's exposure to technology should never be predicated on an ability to afford it."
figvam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 07, 2011, 07:41:40 PM
 #380

My understanding is that the bitcoin plugin isn't included in the source code drop. Am I wrong?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!