Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 10:25:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Dollar-Backed Digital Currency Aims to Fix Bitcoin’s Volatility Dilemma  (Read 6745 times)
Coinbuddy (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 03:31:54 PM
 #1

A Santa Monica-based startup says it has produced the first dollar-backed digital currency. If successful, this new currency could exploit bitcoin’s inexpensive and direct payments network, while avoiding its volatility.
The startup, Realcoin, is set to announce that its digital currency, dubbed realcoins, will be backed one-to-one by a fully auditable reserve of dollars.
The bearer of these realcoins will have the right to redeem them for U.S. currency. That should make realcoin much more stable than bitcoin, which saw an 86-fold increase over the first 11 months of last year only to succumb to a 70% decline in the following four months. Such volatility has detracted from bitcoin’s appeal as a payments mechanism.


Founded by Brock Pierce, a former Disney child actor who is now a prolific bitcoin investor, along with ad industry entrepreneur Reeve Collins and software engineer Craig Sellars, Realcoin is the latest in a wave of so-called Bitcoin 2.0 ventures, which use bitcoin’s computer infrastructure to exchange property and execute contracts without third-party intermediaries. These projects open up bitcoin’s decentralized, peer-to-peer network to a variety of commercial uses beyond just transactions denominated in bitcoins.
“Unfortunately, there has been confusion for people between the currency called bitcoin and the technology called bitcoin, when they are distinctly different things,” said Mr. Collins, Realcoin’s Chief Executive Officer. In effect “we are digitizing the dollar and giving that digital dollar access to the bitcoin blockchain.”
The blockchain is a publicly shared ledger of transactions maintained by a decentralized network of computer owners known as miners, whose machines keep it updated in return for periodic rewards in bitcoin. The system was initially designed to protect the integrity of the currency, ensuring bitcoins couldn’t be double-spent, or counterfeited, thus obviating the need for transactions to pass through banks and other trusted third-party intermediaries.
A few years after bitcoin’s 2009 launch, however, Bitcoin 2.0 developers are creating programs that used the blockchain’s method of validating transactions for different legal arrangements. Thus digitized property could be exchanged, commercial deals could be struck and contracts could be executed, all without engaging fee-charging middlemen.
Realcoin will use a Bitcoin 2.0 software protocol known as Mastercoin, which takes digitized information about particular assets or contracts and embeds it into bitcoin transactions. In this case, that data will define the rights attached to realcoins. Realcoin founder Mr. Sellars is the chief technology officer of the Mastercoin Foundation.
To ensure realcoins retain their value at one dollar, the firm will maintain a real-time record of its dollar-based reserves, all held in conservative investments, and will subject that record to the blockchain’s authenticating system, Mr. Collins said. Realcoins will be introduced or removed from circulation depending on whether dollars are being added or redeemed.
Mr. Collins said Realcoin has signed with a major banking partner and is seeking deals with other banks, digital-currency exchanges and ATM providers to become “gateways” for buying, trading or redeeming realcoins around the world. In creating a global network for people to cheaply and quickly exchange claims on the world’s main reserve currency, it could boost worldwide demand for dollars, he says.
Mr. Collins said Realcoin’s lawyers are working to obtain U.S. money transmitter licenses from those states that require them and that it also plans to issue digital currencies backed by euros and yen.
It’s unclear how realcoin will be received in countries with capital controls such as China and Argentina, whose citizens could use it to circumvent limits on foreign currency.
Realcoin might also attract scorn from bitcoin’s libertarian supporters, who see the independent digital currency as a successor to, not a facilitator of, government-controlled currencies.
Asked about such a reaction, Realcoin founder Mr. Pierce said, “I’m not selling any of my bitcoins. I’m trying to build a host of businesses that are taking advantage of this new emerging payments protocol as well as the currency

Source http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/BL-MBB-23780
Bubbles06
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 03:36:17 PM
 #2

So it's going to be PayPal on the blockchain?
Anders
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 03:51:03 PM
 #3

Sounds interesting. The realcoins will be easy to use in practice (if used in a lot of places). But will the transaction times be around 10 minutes? A credit/debit card transaction only takes a few seconds.
barwizi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 04:10:26 PM
 #4

Well.... thanks for the laugh. I think many people fail to understand why BTC and it's plethora of (functional) babies exist. People are trying to leave the fiat system behind, to actually back one with fiat (IMO) actually increases the DCs' volatility and opens new avenues of exploitation. For a currency to have value, it usually needs to be backed by finite resources and in it's self be finite.

To back with  fiat currency means to value it at the entire fiats' value. Which is diluted everyday as the printing presses never stop running.

Unless they introduce some radical means of limiting this, this will be a flash in the pan and doomed to fail. The evry idea of backing with fiat means opening yourself to national regulation, banking regulation and you can be accused of subversion of bankjing systems , so much can go wrong.
ebliever
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1035


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 05:06:37 PM
 #5

Is Bitcoin volatile? It all depends on your frame of reference. One could just as easily define bitcoin as the reference standard and talk about how volatile fiat currencies are compared to nice, stable bitcoin.

If folks like me are correct, and government overspending eventually leads to a hyperinflationary episode for major fiat currencies, then tying a cryptocurrency to fiat "for stability" will turn out to have been rather counter-productive.

Luke 12:15-21

Ephesians 2:8-9
CryptoDomains
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 159
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 05:13:42 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2014, 12:27:04 AM by CryptoDomains
 #6

I guess this explains the interest in RealCoinWallet.com  Tongue Tongue Tongue
Beliathon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 05:24:47 PM
 #7

This currency will be pumped hard and dumped even harder by the real players. Everyone else who buys a piece of it will get played.

Remember, I warned you.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
ebliever
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1035


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 05:32:44 PM
 #8

This currency will be pumped hard and dumped even harder by the real players. Everyone else who buys a piece of it will get played.

Remember, I warned you.

Exactly how do you pump or dump a coin pegged to a fiat currency? You'd either have to manipulate the entire fiat currency or break the tie between the two. Do you understand that?

Luke 12:15-21

Ephesians 2:8-9
SpontaneousDream
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 07:24:16 PM
 #9

Looks like Andreas is done with the Bitcoin Foundation. Good. Screw the Bitcoin Foundation.

"I can no longer have even the smallest association with the Bitcoin Foundation, because of the complete lack of transparency" https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/486926129409052672
allthingsluxury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1029



View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 07:25:13 PM
 #10

Any and all competition is good. The best will win.

DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3155


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 08:15:09 PM
 #11

Any and all competition is good. The best will win.

This isn't really competition, though.  Call me a cynic, but it doesn't even sound like a currency, as such.  More like a centralised derivative.  If they can add and remove coins at will, it means they're in control of it.  They can set all the rules.  That's not a cryptocurrency and we shouldn't refer to it as one.  If the banks seem keen to get involved, then you know it's a system designed to benefit banks and not one we should give an ounce of trust to.  I hope it crashes and burns before anyone falls for it.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
BitCoinDream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1204

The revolution will be digital


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 08:26:51 PM
 #12

another attempt to make some quick bucks. sad, that it is lead by some frontman of The Bitcoin Foundation.

Melbustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 08:30:01 PM
 #13

Agree with most of the sentiment expressed above. This is a totally misguided idea.

Cross-posting from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=628000.msg7758201#msg7758201

If someone is "backing" a crypto-currency with something else, then that someone is the centralized entity in control of the currency's value.

Why on earth would you want to take something that's designed to be centralized (as all "backing" arrangements must be by definition) and make it far more difficult to use in practice by layering a decentralized blockchain-transaction ledger into it? That makes no sense.

We *tolerate* blockchains, with their mining algs, confirmation times, PoW/PoS issues, forking and convergence, etc, because we *think* that full decentralization is a net societal benefit *despite* the rather significant underlying transaction complexity that blockchains entail.

If you're doing something that's centralized by design, just use a centralized database!!! It's MUCH simpler.

Alas, I think the people behind Realcoin must necessarily succumb to one or both of the following:
1) They're just trying to exploit the current misguided euphoria over "separating the currency from the network" and "blockchain technology" in general.
2) They genuinely do not understand the purpose of a blockchain.

Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 08:35:12 PM
 #14

worst. idea. ever.

Yes, let's take out the principle of being "Trustless" Now we have to trust that somebody is actually backing it with dollars.. Because - you know, Trust - has proven so reliable with the national currencies. (Sarcastic).
And let's take out the part of crypto currencies that requires centralization - and tie it to the centralized Federal Reserve, because who needs all the "Peer to peer" prinicple about no centralization that can go corrupt.?
And let's forget about the principle of limited quantity that won't be hyper-inflated? Because we all have so much faith in the dollar not being over printed and tens off billions of new dollars just appearing each month. This is just the start. Why did people even bother shifting to a currencies with true principles if they are just going to reintroduce the same crap people don't want to use the dollar anymore?

Sounds like somebody is having a hard time shifting their paradigm.

You know what would be great? Let's get horses to pull our cars? YES! *sarcastic again*.

Beliathon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 08:44:29 PM
 #15

You'd either have to manipulate the entire fiat currency..
Sort of like Wall Street did in 2008 when they systematically destroyed 40% of the wealth of the nation? Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. They can and will manipulate the dollar - they're doing it every day! In fact, that's the only reason that dead currency walking has any value at all!

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
leopard2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 08:46:15 PM
 #16

1. Realcoin is tied to the dollar, absolutely no profit can be made by investing in it.
2. It is 100% vulnerable because it can be attacked by the government anytime in which case it will drop to zero. This also means that it will be very tightly regulated.
3. Is it a good onramp and offramp? Maybe, but holding Realcoins is a no-go when there is a potential 0% profit vs 100% loss

Truth is the new hatespeech.
pening
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 245
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 09:02:53 PM
 #17

1. Realcoin is tied to the dollar, absolutely no profit can be made by investing in it.

Or indeed running it.  How do I in the UK get in or out of this coin, presumably i have to pay fees.  Like i would with my bank to hold $.  I'm really not seeing the point of this, unless they make their fees less than the established money transfer businesses.
arbitrage001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1067
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 09:05:34 PM
 #18

Had a feeling something like this will emerge eventually.

The question is, how much is it going to cost them to operate in the US and worldwide in term of licensing fee?
cozk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 10:02:35 PM
 #19

reminds me of DigiCash.

Similar to bitcoin in the 90's. Was centralized and went bankrupt.
EvilDave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 10:21:21 PM
 #20

Hell, no.

Nulli Dei, nulli Reges, solum NXT
Love your money: www.nxt.org  www.ardorplatform.org
www.nxter.org  www.nxtfoundation.org
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!