Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 11:11:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Notes/certificates  (Read 1016 times)
Cred (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 05:57:34 PM
 #1

Thinking about easing use of BTC just two days ago I thought why nobody has introduced BTC certificates that would act like Cassius coins but be just paper and disposable if you wanted to 'redeem' them digitally. The note would be like a scratchcard that had a QR of a public address so that you could verify that it hasn't been spent with a quick scan of the BitScan or similar app. The private key would then be under a tamper proof seal with a signature from the issuing company on the front to verify it isn't fake.

Once enough of these in various denominations are in circulation people would begin to see that they can't be faked and will get used to trusting their value without bothering to verify that the address contains the balance. You then have circulating cash that needs no technical knowledge, just the old school wisdom of spotting a fake and not letting people nick your real wallet.

It was only hours after I had this thought that Max Keiser started tweeting about Prypto cards that seem to be several steps ahead of me. Searching on here it seems only the germans are onto this. Any reason why there's less talk of a cash form in English?

The only problem I see it how the issuing company makes a profit enough to cover the risks but I guess Prypto has a plan.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4228
Merit: 4490



View Profile
July 15, 2014, 06:20:38 PM
 #2

people have done this.. guess you need more research

here is a nice long 36 page thread about it.. which began the whole paper based bitcoin system

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92969.0

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Cred (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 06:33:15 PM
 #3

Those are just paper wallets. I was thinking more of fixed amounts with the amount on the front to simplify it for non techies.

Ideally you wouldn't be able to send coins to the address and only redeem the whole amount but there'd be no incentive to do anything else anyway.

The point is making them usable as cash.
keithers
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001


This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 06:52:59 PM
 #4

Those are just paper wallets. I was thinking more of fixed amounts with the amount on the front to simplify it for non techies.

Ideally you wouldn't be able to send coins to the address and only redeem the whole amount but there'd be no incentive to do anything else anyway.

The point is making them usable as cash.

The receiver would have to be able to verify that there are actually coins on these "notes"
Baitty
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Currently held as collateral by monbux


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 06:53:11 PM
 #5

Those are just paper wallets. I was thinking more of fixed amounts with the amount on the front to simplify it for non techies.

Ideally you wouldn't be able to send coins to the address and only redeem the whole amount but there'd be no incentive to do anything else anyway.

The point is making them usable as cash.

People have done it basically a physical Bitcoin is a wallet with a fixed amount on it. and I know a few did it with paper to lower costs.

Currently held as collateral by monbux
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4228
Merit: 4490



View Profile
July 15, 2014, 06:59:54 PM
 #6

Those are just paper wallets. I was thinking more of fixed amounts with the amount on the front to simplify it for non techies.

Ideally you wouldn't be able to send coins to the address and only redeem the whole amount but there'd be no incentive to do anything else anyway.

The point is making them usable as cash.

same idea. and amongst the 36 pages were discussions of a central service that held the private keys. so that the notes just held the public key for value verification. but most preferred the de-centralised method, which meant that holograms were placed over the privkey and any tampering would make the note void.

most people just use them like gift vouchers/cards. from on person to another. not true circulation just betwn 2 people, such as inside a birthday card to relatives.

but atleast if you search for bitcoin notes you will see your idea is not new. and has been poked and prodded for atlast 2 years

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 3234



View Profile
July 15, 2014, 07:58:49 PM
Last edit: July 15, 2014, 08:14:06 PM by odolvlobo
 #7

people have done this.. guess you need more research
here is a nice long 36 page thread about it.. which began the whole paper based bitcoin system
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92969.0

This is a better thread from 2010:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737.0

or maybe this one from 2011:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7724.0
and some pictures:
https://www.google.com/search?q=bitbillsx&tbm=isch

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Cred (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 08:27:52 PM
 #8

I guess the question is what will the idea ever take off then? I guess they all just got hoarded too. As for the design, I know you can't have the private key visible. I remember some gift cards being shown on TV and a viewer just scanned the QR code at took them (he did give them back). Good lesson but shows that things need to a lot more foolproof for ordinary people to start using them.
allthingsluxury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1029



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 08:30:14 PM
 #9

Correct, this has been done.

bg002h
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1047


I outlived my lifetime membership:)


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2014, 12:06:48 AM
Last edit: July 16, 2014, 12:22:01 AM by bg002h
 #10

people have done this.. guess you need more research
here is a nice long 36 page thread about it.. which began the whole paper based bitcoin system
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92969.0

This is a better thread from 2010:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737.0

or maybe this one from 2011:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7724.0
and some pictures:
https://www.google.com/search?q=bitbillsx&tbm=isch

I have a full set of BitBills if anyone's interested.

I also can reasonably assume I'm the first and possibly the only one to have attempted to use X-rays to read the qr code without disrupting the seal...non-metallic ink it appears…my test failed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=103464.msg1145251#msg1145251

Hardforks aren't that hard. It’s getting others to use them that's hard.
1GCDzqmX2Cf513E8NeThNHxiYEivU1Chhe
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 12:17:36 AM
 #11

Somehow it's great how the same ideas come up again and again by different people who 'invent' them totally separate from each other! Smiley Really, this always amazes me!

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!