Lorenzo (OP)
|
|
July 16, 2014, 10:58:02 AM |
|
Does anyone know the exact numbers?
For example, you might need a balance of 1,000 BTC to be in the top 100, 10 BTC to be in the top 10,000, etc.
Note the above is just a random guess. I'm interested in finding the real numbers. It would be fascinating to see how my address containing 0.3 BTC stacks up compared to the other addresses in the Bitcoin community.
|
|
|
|
elebit
|
|
July 16, 2014, 11:03:44 AM |
|
You will never get true numbers because of Bitcoin's pseudonymity. The best you can do would be a randomized sample of the Bitcoin population and extrapolate from there. But that is probably easier said than done, as a large part of the user base wouldn't want to participate in that.
|
|
|
|
boymilk
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
July 16, 2014, 11:17:58 AM |
|
Not sure if this is legit or not, but according to that site: Top 1: 151,497 BTC ($93,074,379 USD) Top 10: 53,019 BTC ($32,572,739 USD) Top 100: 10,000 BTC ($6,143,629 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.htmlTop 1,000: 1,251 BTC ($768,783 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses-10.htmlTop 10,000: 106.80 BTC ($65,611 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses-100.htmlUnfortunately, it seems to end at page 100. And the private keys to many of these addresses could be lost or owned by Satoshi. It might be possible to calculate the balance required to get into the top 100,000 by using the table at the top of the page but the maths to do so would be pretty complicated. EDIT: Forgot to mention that it is possible that a single person could own multiple addresses. And a single address can also house the funds of multiple people (e.g. an exchange's address).
|
|
|
|
Lorenzo (OP)
|
|
July 16, 2014, 11:23:02 AM |
|
Not sure if this is legit or not, but according to that site: Top 1: 151,497 BTC ($93,074,379 USD) Top 10: 53,019 BTC ($32,572,739 USD) Top 100: 10,000 BTC ($6,143,629 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.htmlTop 1,000: 1,251 BTC ($768,783 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses-10.htmlTop 10,000: 106.80 BTC ($65,611 USD) Link: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses-100.htmlUnfortunately, it seems to end at page 100. And the private keys to many of these addresses could be lost or owned by Satoshi. It might be possible to calculate the balance required to get into the top 100,000 by using the table at the top of the page but the maths to do so would be pretty complicated. EDIT: Forgot to mention that it is possible that a single person could own multiple addresses. And a single address can also house the funds of multiple people (e.g. an exchange's address). Interesting. I would have expected the numbers to be a lot lower than that. So if you have 1 BTC, then you are part of the Top 323,130 since 208,406 + 99,800 + 13,390 + 1,434 + 98 + 2 = 323,130.
|
|
|
|
tmbp
|
|
July 16, 2014, 01:22:06 PM |
|
It assumes that everyone would hold all of their savings in a single address which is a pretty wild assumption.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Magazine
|
|
July 16, 2014, 01:24:42 PM |
|
It assumes that everyone would hold all of their savings in a single address which is a pretty wild assumption.
maybe the game we're playing is how much can u put in 1 address
|
i am here.
|
|
|
giveBTCpls
|
|
July 16, 2014, 01:24:45 PM |
|
Not even part of the 1 BTC crew checkin in.
|
|
|
|
BitChick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 16, 2014, 02:11:02 PM |
|
Not even part of the 1 BTC crew checkin in.
You need to "buyBTCpls." If you are expecting people to just give them too you (based on your user name) I think you will just end up disappointed. It seems people are less likely to part with Bitcoin than even cash. Many know how much they could be or should be worth.
|
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
RenegadeMind
|
|
July 16, 2014, 02:40:05 PM |
|
Top 1: 151,497 BTC ($93,074,379 USD)
The site obviously doesn't take Mark Karpeles into account...
|
|
|
|
Gianluca95
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1196
Reputation first.
|
|
July 16, 2014, 03:25:38 PM |
|
To be in top 100 you must have more of 10.000 Bitcoin ! in Top 1000 you must have around 1300 Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
Minecache
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
July 16, 2014, 03:28:51 PM |
|
Well 21 bit coins makes you 1 in a million.
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3402
|
|
July 16, 2014, 03:46:49 PM |
|
You are guaranteed to be in the top 100 if you have more than 1% of the 13 million available bitcoins, or more than 130,000 BTC. In the top ... | If you have ... | 100 | 130,000 | 1,000 | 13,000 | 10,000 | 1,300 | 100,000 | 130 | 1,000,000 | 13 |
But because of the skew towards the top, the necessary amounts are probably actually much less.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
|
|
July 16, 2014, 03:59:44 PM |
|
Well, if you trust Risto Pietilä, then this is the Bitcoin wealth distribution. (latest): 22. Apr 2014
#People | #Bitcoins | #TotalBitcoins | 70 | BTC10k+ | 3.6M | 930 | BTC1k-10k | 2.2M | 13k | BTC100-1k | 3.0M | 85k | BTC10-100 | 2.3M | 250k | BTC1-10 | 0.8M | 340k | BTC0.1-1 | 0.1M | 230k | BTC0.01-0.1 | 0.0M | 90k | BTC0.002-0.01 | 0.0M |
Total: 12.2M bitcoins (0.5M bitcoins assumed lost)
|
|
|
|
philiveyjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2014, 12:09:20 AM |
|
You are guaranteed to be in the top 100 if you have more than 1% of the 13 million available bitcoins, or more than 130,000 BTC. In the top ... | If you have ... | 100 | 130,000 | 1,000 | 13,000 | 10,000 | 1,300 | 100,000 | 130 | 1,000,000 | 13 |
But because of the skew towards the top, the necessary amounts are probably actually much less. yeah should be a bit lesser to be in top 100
|
|
|
|
susan234
|
|
October 08, 2014, 12:55:01 AM |
|
Of course, the more the better.
isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|