Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 05:04:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [PROOF] Altcoin Scam  (Read 6957 times)
sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 05:10:34 PM
Last edit: July 17, 2014, 09:43:20 PM by sr.machado
 #1

Hey there, as I said, I came here to fulfill a promise to prove that CoffeeCoin and Spaetacus  Coin are SCAM and NINJA!

1st: I make the proof with images;
2nd: My computed is very slow, so I waste 5 hours of my time coding and searching data to proof!
3rd: If you want to donate to me some mBTC: 1Nz8kcPrUYVcqdqUBWVcbqMg6SdbkeuPsE
4th: If you want that I search on your coin, I can make this, for FREE you will receive my SEAL! (Community ask for this on PM)
If I find a NINJA, HIDE PREMINE You will receive this SEAL:





So, let's go, read the images!
1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

6:

7:

8 (Here have a wrong information, please read this explanation:

9:

10:

11:

12:

13:

14:

15:

16:

17:

18:

19:

20:

21:

22:

23:

24:

25:

26:

27:


My TWITTER: @leandrogmachado
Best Regards

BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
1714885443
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714885443

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714885443
Reply with quote  #2

1714885443
Report to moderator
1714885443
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714885443

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714885443
Reply with quote  #2

1714885443
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
capoeira
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2388
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 05:18:55 PM
 #2






da man

schiavonxv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 515


Guto Schiavon / FOXBIT


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 05:25:55 PM
 #3

Please,  give me credits for the picture kkkk

Good Job Cheesy






███████████   ▄▄███████▄▄    ▄█▄      ▄█▄   █████████▄▄   ████  ██████████████
████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  █████████████  ▀████▄  ▄████▀  ████▀▀▀▀████  ████  ▀▀▀▀▀████▀▀▀▀▀
████        ███████████████   ▀████████▀    ████    ▄███  ████       ████
█████████   ███████████████     ██████      ███████████   ████       ████
████▀▀▀▀▀   ███████████████   ▄████████▄    ████    ▀███  ████       ████
████        ▄█████████████  ▄████▀  ▀████▄  ████▄▄▄▄████  ████       ████
████      ▄███ ▀▀██████▀▀    ▀█▀      ▀█▀   █████████▀▀   ████       ████
         ▐███▌       ▄▄▄▄
         ▐█████▄▄▄███▀  ▀█▄
          ▀██████████▄▀▀▀▀█▄
            ▀█████▀▀
██
║║
║║
║║
██
██
██
║║
║║
║║
██
██
║║
║║
║║
██
██
██
║║
║║
║║
██

▄████████████████▄
███████████▀▀▀▀███
█████████▀     ███
█████████   ██████
███████        ███
█████████   ██████
█████████   ██████
▀████████   █████▀



 █████████████████
████████▀██████████
████████   ▀███████
████████   ▄███████
████████▄██████████
 █████████████████
sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 05:33:38 PM
 #4

Schiavonxv thanks guy for this awesome image.

BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
fishy91
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 05:48:06 PM
 #5

Did you analyse the first CoffeeCoin source, or the CoffeeCoin V2 source? The second CoffeeCoin was coded by the orange coin dev, and the first was coded by a cowboy. The current person in charge of CoffeeCoin had a nightmare sorting out the mess the previous dev left behind. I hope you analysed the first CoffeeCoin source because I recently brought some of the V2 CoffeeCoins.
Dexter12
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 05:59:44 PM
 #6

Did you analyse the first CoffeeCoin source, or the CoffeeCoin V2 source? The second CoffeeCoin was coded by the orange coin dev, and the first was coded by a cowboy. The current person in charge of CoffeeCoin had a nightmare sorting out the mess the previous dev left behind. I hope you analysed the first CoffeeCoin source because I recently brought some of the V2 CoffeeCoins.
Think he is talking about [COF] not [CFC2].
fishy91
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 06:19:23 PM
 #7

I'm relieved to hear that. I knew the original COF was useless, but the CFC2 wallet seems to work OK and I'm hoping they go up in price now the previous devs mess has been fixed.
Lucksee
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 07:21:51 PM
 #8

Obligatory request on behalf of all proto-coders:

Where can I begin to learn how to comprehend all the disciplinces of the cryptofields with only a basic 101 understanding of programming?

 (Personally, I've only coded with javascript...)?

Basically, if I want to dive deeper into the code of crypto... where do I begin "khan academy" style?
C++?
sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 07:37:46 PM
 #9

Guys, I'm talking about CoffeeCoin [COF]!

@Lucksee

You need invest your time to learn and patience!


BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
YarkoL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 996
Merit: 1012


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 07:47:26 PM
 #10

C++?

You got it.

“God does not play dice"
MisO69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005


My mule don't like people laughing


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 08:10:44 PM
 #11

Thanks for this, I wonder how many other coins are similar. Probably the same dev.
FreebieZoner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 08:15:46 PM
 #12

Hot damn,  good job on sniffing out scam coins.  We need more of these kinds of service before people start throwing their money everywhere when it should go here to this guy.

My GOODies
GOOD GdW7XLTFByH1AU5dZjA2MEewRaTMzek5sw
sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 08:31:31 PM
 #13

Guys, I've compiled this SHITCOIN to developer and my friend request a low level sniff on this code and I find this! So, It's scam and I'm asking for a fee to find new scams because the Developers can need a seal that is a good choice to invest!

BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
PolarPoint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 08:31:52 PM
 #14

Well done OP! We can't be sure scam coins were mined, but it is certainly possible! and dev can also hide the coins from a block explorer. So, all alts can do this?
sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 08:46:54 PM
 #15

Well done OP! We can't be sure scam coins were mined, but it is certainly possible! and dev can also hide the coins from a block explorer. So, all alts can do this?

Yes, if the developer want to do he can do, but can find for developers that have access to source-code!

BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
capoeira
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2388
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:00:43 PM
 #16

Well done OP! We can't be sure scam coins were mined, but it is certainly possible! and dev can also hide the coins from a block explorer. So, all alts can do this?


don´ t worry, Mr. Machado is now officially "scam sniffer"  Grin

Tamis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:16:09 PM
 #17

Congratulation on the find and your great explanation !
dreamwatcher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 09:20:52 PM
 #18

Well,

Not that I support scam coins, and not stating an opinion about the coins is question, but the OP is wrong about a few things in terms of code and explorers.

For now, lets just start with the the line he claims hides the subsidy amount of a block , does nothing of the sort.

Code:
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))

This line is saying: If the Debug flag is true and the parameter "printcreation" is true:

The Debug flag is turned on with a parameter when first starting the coin daemon/client. "printcreation" is a specific parameter to print out the block creation info in the debug log.

If both these conditions are not true, the next line that "hides" the subsidy does not execute and does nothing.

However, the debug print statement does nothing of the sort.
Code:
printf("GetProofOfWorkReward(): create =%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nSubsidy);

The printf statement is simply that, print(in this case to the debug log).

"GetProofOfWorkReward(): create =%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n"

Means the literal words:  GetProofOfWorkReward(): create =

The %s means the first string argument declared after the quotes, in this case : FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(),

The c.str() simply means to cast nSubisidy as a string instead of the numeric type that it is. This does not change the value or anything of the sort, only returns it as a different type.

%"PRId64" simply means to expect a 64 bit number, instead of a string.

What all this means is that Create= will show a nice formatted representation of subsidy and nSubsidy=%"PRId64 will show the raw number.

nSubisdy is declared in the above code and is not changed in these lines, so it will print to the debug log the correct number.

Now the Block explorers.

There is something wrong with the explorer  or the setup of the explorer you are using.

If you do any research on me, you will discover that using and writing block explorers is one of the major projects I have done here for a few years.

I have used, modified and ran explorers based an ABE. Most recently I have written a completely new block explorer system from scratch and my block explorer service is based on the new system.

www.cryptocoinexplorer.com

Now, I will admit that I do not have any experience with so called "Block Crawlers", which are not really block explorers in my opinion as they do not create and maintain a database separate from the coin daemon.

However, I highly doubt they are using the "Debug output" to get their information. If they are, that is not good at all.

If you want to prove the daemon is "lying" try this:

issue this command:
Code:
getblockhash 1

Assuming the block in question is block 1. Use whatever block you question.

then:

Code:
getblock {Block hash from step one}


That is the information my explorer system uses and to a degree ABE will use (Though Abe will also use the blk.dat file to try and extract information)



Now, before you decide to go off on some crazy rant, I suggest you look a bit into who I am and my reputation around here, you might just find I know what I am talking about.  Smiley









sr.machado (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Twitter: @leandrogmachado


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:28:10 PM
Last edit: July 18, 2014, 10:37:07 PM by sr.machado
 #19

Well,

Not that I support scam coins, and not stating an opinion about the coins is question, but the OP is wrong about a few things in terms of code and explorers.



GOOD and nice explanation guy!
I use an generic information on my images! And yes, you're a good developer and 1,000 times better than me... Thanks for you post and explanation! On next scamcoins I'll quote your text! OK?
But here I have the proofs using the code that you said!
FIRST:


SECOND:


THIRD:



Thanks

BTC: 1LeandroRqTJf4stf2uD3TeYDszenqNHfz
Bitcoin protocol consultor
Shadow_Runner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:39:41 PM
 #20

Great work.  Smiley
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!