|
Coin-Moron
|
 |
August 14, 2014, 01:04:40 PM |
|
Please give us some hope DEV
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 14, 2014, 02:35:45 PM |
|
I dont want to say, bu no hope, shit dev, just copy paste.
The one who invested in this coin, we must admit we made a terrible mistake.
Maybe someone else professional dev take over this coin is a good choice.
Relax, and don't panic. We have no choice but to wait. Oddly enough, somebody just paid 200-250 sats for some and it wasn't me.  |
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 14, 2014, 02:51:28 PM |
|
Bye bye, good luck.
LOL, if you have coins in your wallet where are you going? You have stuck coins so I'm sure you will still be in the thread. |
|
|
|
|
flunkie
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2014, 03:51:07 PM |
|
I would tend to agree with Jake on this. I don't think a working wallet is enough to rekindle interest as we have lost the early momentum. I believe people
will need to see some progress with the coin before they buy. Enigma might just do the trick. From the sounds of it much of the code is already in place, so a
reasonably quick implementation is possible. After all the wallet issues, some progress would look good.
We think that when Enigma and our initial smart contract functionality is implemented, there won't be a problem with interest in the project, since neither are implemented or implemented fully in a coin yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 14, 2014, 04:09:59 PM |
|
I would tend to agree with Jake on this. I don't think a working wallet is enough to rekindle interest as we have lost the early momentum. I believe people
will need to see some progress with the coin before they buy. Enigma might just do the trick. From the sounds of it much of the code is already in place, so a
reasonably quick implementation is possible. After all the wallet issues, some progress would look good.
We think that when Enigma and our initial smart contract functionality is implemented, there won't be a problem with interest in the project, since neither are implemented or implemented fully in a coin yet. Agreed, so what's the deal? |
|
|
|
|
sluppy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041
|
|
August 14, 2014, 04:49:35 PM |
|
I would tend to agree with Jake on this. I don't think a working wallet is enough to rekindle interest as we have lost the early momentum. I believe people
will need to see some progress with the coin before they buy. Enigma might just do the trick. From the sounds of it much of the code is already in place, so a
reasonably quick implementation is possible. After all the wallet issues, some progress would look good.
We think that when Enigma and our initial smart contract functionality is implemented, there won't be a problem with interest in the project, since neither are implemented or implemented fully in a coin yet. a working wallet might not be enough, but it would be a nice start .. its been weeks now i hold some of this dust but how do u expect people to have faith in the dev's if they cant Fix this within a reasonable ammount of time. That having been said Im not selling any at these prices but u gotta agree its crazy for this wallet to take weeks going on months. Not trying to Fud just a little miffed about the slow progress. |
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 14, 2014, 04:52:42 PM |
|
I would tend to agree with Jake on this. I don't think a working wallet is enough to rekindle interest as we have lost the early momentum. I believe people
will need to see some progress with the coin before they buy. Enigma might just do the trick. From the sounds of it much of the code is already in place, so a
reasonably quick implementation is possible. After all the wallet issues, some progress would look good.
We think that when Enigma and our initial smart contract functionality is implemented, there won't be a problem with interest in the project, since neither are implemented or implemented fully in a coin yet. a working wallet might not be enough, but it would be a nice start .. its been weeks now i hold some of this dust but how do u expect people to have faith in the dev's if they cant Fix this within a reasonable ammount of time. That having been said Im not selling any at these prices but u gotta agree its crazy for this wallet to take weeks going on months. Not trying to Fud just a little miffed about the slow progress. I'm a little miffed too, but definitely not in panic mode yet. The one thing I would say is I'm sure they can put out a standard wallet with static interest if they wanted to. But, I believe they are trying to fix the dynamic interest, which isn't a standard feature that most coins have. |
|
|
|
|
flunkie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2014, 04:56:42 PM |
|
Agreed, so what's the deal?
We're still trying to make the wallet work. Max and I are working on a fix for the current wallet and at the same time we're doing our best with the limited availability of our dev. We're also talking to a few other developers and discussing maybe adding an additional member to the dev team. As for the slow progress, we know that it's our biggest problem right now. All we can say is that it won't always be like this. It's been a perfect storm of problems that have completely thrown us off track as far as timely developmental updates go. But we're still here and we're still working on it. The problem with reverting to a standard wallet with static interest is that all of the coins that have been created through dynamic interest thus far would be invalidated. That's the only reason we're even grappling with this problem right now. The test wallet is having similar problems with dynamic interest as the first one. One proposed fix was that we lengthen the time between blocks so that the issue of different blockchains due to the dynamic interest system is mitigated. So that's where we are right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Battareus
|
|
August 14, 2014, 05:10:48 PM |
|
Agreed, so what's the deal?
... The problem with reverting to a standard wallet with static interest is that all of the coins that have been created through dynamic interest thus far would be invalidated. That's the only reason we're even grappling with this problem right now. The test wallet is having similar problems with dynamic interest as the first one. One proposed fix was that we lengthen the time between blocks so that the issue of different blockchains due to the dynamic interest system is mitigated. So that's where we are right now. It you had to do even before mining was launched!  |
|
|
|
|
k0tz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2014, 05:46:25 PM |
|
Agreed, so what's the deal?
We're still trying to make the wallet work. Max and I are working on a fix for the current wallet and at the same time we're doing our best with the limited availability of our dev. We're also talking to a few other developers and discussing maybe adding an additional member to the dev team. As for the slow progress, we know that it's our biggest problem right now. All we can say is that it won't always be like this. It's been a perfect storm of problems that have completely thrown us off track as far as timely developmental updates go. But we're still here and we're still working on it. The problem with reverting to a standard wallet with static interest is that all of the coins that have been created through dynamic interest thus far would be invalidated. That's the only reason we're even grappling with this problem right now. The test wallet is having similar problems with dynamic interest as the first one. One proposed fix was that we lengthen the time between blocks so that the issue of different blockchains due to the dynamic interest system is mitigated. So that's where we are right now. Looking forward to see a new wallet. Still holding  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deephouse
|
|
August 14, 2014, 08:29:18 PM |
|
thanks again for the update flukie. Take your time, but just keep us posted on a regular basis.
|
|
|
|
|
mightgetlucky
|
|
August 15, 2014, 02:20:28 AM |
|
this coin is so cheap u can pump it with 10-20 btc's and no news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 15, 2014, 02:22:44 AM |
|
this coin is so cheap u can pump it with .10-.20 btc's and no news.
Fixed your post. |
|
|
|
|
|
Battareus
|
|
August 15, 2014, 12:21:48 PM |
|
Let's count, Alex!
11+1+3 = 15th
Let's think about what should appear on August 15?
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
August 15, 2014, 12:39:38 PM |
|
Hey Alex,
Can we get an update on where we're at?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zulandio
|
|
August 15, 2014, 05:42:51 PM |
|
Can we get a dam working wallet and worry about the stake later?!?! This is going to kill this coin FFS>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coin-Moron
|
|
August 15, 2014, 05:50:48 PM |
|
Can we get a dam working wallet and worry about the stake later?!?! This is going to kill this coin FFS>
This is the only coin ever i haven't been impatient about. You will be happy enough very soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coin-Moron
|
|
August 15, 2014, 05:51:15 PM |
|
Some strange trade's going on |
|
|
|
|
k0tz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 05:54:02 PM |
|
Some strange trade's going on What do you mean? |
|
|
|
|
|
