[ANN] XCloudcoin File hosting [Moved To New Thread]

[gagalady]

It's how all IPO's go these days!  The dev literally sets what he wants for each coin and then gets BTC up front before a wallet even comes out!  It's insanity man.  Why do people buy in?  Your guess is as good as mine.  They hate money, that's all I can figure.

It's because IPOs can make money for investors too. Look at NXT with their insane rate of return.

Even for all the failed ICOs on Bittrex, most made money for investors if they sold early. XBC on polo was like a 40x return on investment at one point. Via, another recent one (non-exchange ICO), has gone up to 6x investment.

Of course pump/dumps aren't healthy for crypto, and plenty of people have been burned on ICOs too. But that's why they are popular. But to work even short term, they probably need to sell out, and that is becoming less likely the more ICOs that Bittrex runs.

The original IPO for NXT was 2 sats per NXT!!!!!!!!!!!! This developer is asking for 10,000 sats + per coin. You are comparing apples and oranges. This developer is going to be rich on day 1.

The Total supply is 5,000,000 and there's no additional coins through mining to further dilute the value of the coin. It seems you suck at calculation  or you just plain dumb right from the womb.

How many Nxtcoin are in circulation?? I bet you wouldn't have invested in Nxt either!

[1714717073]

1714717073

[1714717073]

1714717073

[dandruff1138]

It's how all IPO's go these days!  The dev literally sets what he wants for each coin and then gets BTC up front before a wallet even comes out!  It's insanity man.  Why do people buy in?  Your guess is as good as mine.  They hate money, that's all I can figure.

It's because IPOs can make money for investors too. Look at NXT with their insane rate of return.

Even for all the failed ICOs on Bittrex, most made money for investors if they sold early. XBC on polo was like a 40x return on investment at one point. Via, another recent one (non-exchange ICO), has gone up to 6x investment.

Of course pump/dumps aren't healthy for crypto, and plenty of people have been burned on ICOs too. But that's why they are popular. But to work even short term, they probably need to sell out, and that is becoming less likely the more ICOs that Bittrex runs.

The original IPO for NXT was 2 sats per NXT!!!!!!!!!!!! This developer is asking for 10,000 sats + per coin. You are comparing apples and oranges. This developer is going to be rich on day 1.

The Total supply is 5,000,000 and there's no additional coins through mining to further dilute the value of the coin. It seems you suck at calulucaion or you just plain dumb right from the womb.

How many Nxtcoin are in circulation?? I bet you wouldn't have invested in Nxt either!

You mean "Calculation?" 

[gobpaul]

XCloudcoin Service

Free services 2GB Storage Some features
Membership Service 100GB Storage All Features ------ 220 CLD/month
Premium Service 500 GB Storage All Features (Entry to Tor/hyperboria XCloud beta)------ 500 CLD/month

Thanks for the info but your price comparing with dropbox is double and dropbox is giving unlimited storage for 5 people for $15 /month.If possible then reduce the price.

XCloudcoin Service : Premium Service 500 GB Storage All Features (Entry to Tor/hyperboria XCloud beta)------ 500 CLD/month  = 0.00010300 x 500 = 0.0515 x 600 =  $30.9 /month

dropbox  :   $15 / user / monthMinimum 5 users  ,  Storage  :As much as needed


https://www.dropbox.com/business/pricing

[xcloudcoin]

https://i.imgur.com/INJUIo3.pngXCloudcoin Service

Free services 2GB Storage Some features
Membership Service 100GB Storage All Features ------ 220 CLD/month
Premium Service 500 GB Storage All Features (Entry to Tor/hyperboria XCloud beta)------ 500 CLD/month

Thanks for the info but your price comparing with dropbox is double and dropbox is giving unlimited storage for 5 people for $15 /month.If possible then reduce the price.

XCloudcoin Service : Premium Service 500 GB Storage All Features (Entry to Tor/hyperboria XCloud beta)------ 500 CLD/month  = 0.00010300 x 500 = 0.0515 x 600 =  $30.9 /month

dropbox  :   $15 / user / monthMinimum 5 users  ,  Storage  :As much as needed


https://www.dropbox.com/business/pricing

The price is quite high right now due to economies of scale, as we expand and get a larger server farm the costs will decrease and the features will increase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

[Efelts01]

Fail....next

[MinerMario]

Ok so has the coin now nothing more than a cloud client and a wallet.
Everything else is promises.  The price will drop rapidly when these promises are not met quickly.

This is a high risk for all investors or Scam.

yes. just like icb scam.

could even be the same dev.

be very careful everyone.

we have nothing to do with icb, we are under current development and we have a product to show for.
your free to use the test account to try our service, tomorrow we will be giving beta access to everyone.

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds is going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

[xcloudcoin]

Ok so has the coin now nothing more than a cloud client and a wallet.
Everything else is promises.  The price will drop rapidly when these promises are not met quickly.

This is a high risk for all investors or Scam.

yes. just like icb scam.

could even be the same dev.

be very careful everyone.

we have nothing to do with icb, we are under current development and we have a product to show for.
your free to use the test account to try our service, tomorrow we will be giving beta access to everyone.

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

We chose Bittrex because it's the most favourable exchange with the highest trading volume. Please try and use our software and you will realise that it's good, usable and advanced. Please pm us so we can give you an invite to the service so you can personally test it and try it out.

[poornamelessme]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

[MinerMario]

Thanks xcloudcoin for the prompt reply

I see the integration of wallet into the owncloud and this is unique.This is what I want to know for this project which it seems an amazing project.

As for the content I understand that the cloud is a centralized service and I would like to ask if there is an option for making it decentralized by storing the data in the block chain (see http://bitcloudproject.org/ for example).
As for the content recognition you are mentioning I assume you are using a content ID. Is this content ID will identifying also copyrighted material like mp3, e-books, movies etc ? Cause if not then the cloud service will face legal issues from the persons - companies that they hold this materials and this may create additional problems for the cloud service or even will drive the service to the court cause it maybe stands for piracy and illegal distribution of content.In my opinion you should take care of the law about the distribution of copyrighted material.
On the other hand if the cloud service is totally decentralized (as bitcloud stands for) then there is nothing you can do for copyrighted material.

As for the wallet, I've seen that is integrated into the cloud.
I would like to ask, is this integrated via web API ?
Is there an independent wallet application that it will be distributed as well?
The wallet security will be based on the cloud's user credentials only ?
Is there a transaction fee ?
And finally is there an option for selling materials via the cloud ? (i.e. let's say I am a musician, as long as the service can stream mp3 it might be a great usage of the cloud if I can sell directly my music directly via the cloud - and of the materials can stay only in the cloud, as encrypted materials then I am protected as well).

Sorry for all those questions.This project seems very interesting and very promising but unfortunately the OP doesn't covers all of my queries on this.

Thanks

Great post Vrontis,
at this point we are still researching that possibility to have a decentralized drive has a extra feature on the cloud or wallet.

for copyright and content id we are integrating a flag o report module that is required so content could be flag or reported and taken down if is in any violation.

great example on the mp3 possibilities, like right now your able to keep what you want private or share it, everything could be password protected or have a time expiration set to it while sharing it.
 
a payment system is currently under research xcloudpay, users would be able to send and receive payments and even setup and escrow if need it, more details will be release at do time, we do have a list that everything we have under current research on our website.

the online wallet is being tested in 2 ways with a secure web api fully working and a direct module in the cloud on current development.

we would really appreciate your feedback send me an inbox so you could get an invite for beta testing.

I guess a more straight to the point question would be, why wouldn't I just use any of the existing free cloud services out their, and skip your project and the need to invest in it all together? What is going to make you better than the rest? What is the burning need for this?

And the issue brought up earlier with the porn/copyrights/etc.. are going to be very major hurdles for you to cross. Better have come before you and been raided for less, how do you see yourself overcoming these obstacles?

[xcloudcoin]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.

[MinerMario]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

[poornamelessme]

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.

I think it less an issue if the software is real, or even if it's a good coin. Perhaps you haven't kept track of Bittrex ICOs, but they have sort of gone like this:

XLC (dev never used ICO funds for coin, coin tanked)
DCM (dev team ran off with over 100 BTC, coin delisted)
Harmony (coin price tanked)
Iceberg (price tanked, no idea about devs, didn't keep track of that one)
Architect Coin (DOA, never was able to complete ICO, refund given)
Venture Coin (also appears DOA, current ICO)

Don't mistake volume for popularity, as a lot of people sort of despise Bittrex at the moment. It's just bad timing to try to run an ICO there right now, at least under their regular rules.

[xcloudcoin]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

[dandruff1138]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

[xcloudcoin]

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.

I think it less an issue if the software is real, or even if it's a good coin. Perhaps you haven't kept track of Bittrex ICOs, but they have sort of gone like this:

XLC (dev never used ICO funds for coin, coin tanked)
DCM (dev team ran off with over 100 BTC, coin delisted)
Harmony (coin price tanked)
Iceberg (price tanked, no idea about devs, didn't keep track of that one)
Architect Coin (DOA, never was able to complete ICO, refund given)
Venture Coin (also appears DOA, current ICO)

Don't mistake volume for popularity, as a lot of people sort of despise Bittrex at the moment. It's just bad timing to try to run an ICO there right now, at least under their regular rules.

it's unfortunate that this happened to these coins but obviously some people will abuse systems like anything in life. this is the reason why we are providing software to the community which was funded by ourselves so everyone can try it and understand how many features we have already implemented. not all ICOS on bittrex forever can be bad, if they are always bad there is no opportunity for growth. also we are not trying to sound arrogant but the features that we have implemented are far beyond these coins at the current state anyway and we have proof of it which you can try right now. the aim is just to develop good technology and boost everyone involved.

[xcloudcoin]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement

[dandruff1138]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement

Just like I am sure they had with all the scam coins they release

[Nyterax]

Does someone have a tl;dr comparison between this and Storj and MaidSafe?

[xcloudcoin]

You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement

Just like I am sure they had with all the scam coins they release

I think this there new terms and conditions for ICO's because at the start there were problems with some ICO's as you probably know

[mikesrevenge]

This looks pretty cool... and they are offering more than most nowadays.

Check the first post and test the software.