I wasn't going to bother replying to the 'adoni' crap posts because you guys did a good enough job of demonstrating your own lack of credibility in
here, but seeing you shilling this 'book' again, I couldn't help but include a warning for everyone else, as I'm still smelling something suspicious about the activity of all your alt accounts (which are all very recently registered and posting heavily).
Let's be honest, as much as you say you 'just got the info in an email blast' in an attempt to convey a casual distance, but you're working for the 'company' that 'published' this ebook, as we've already established in other threads. You're obviously biased and have not yet demonstrated that the person who claims to be a Doctor a) exists, b) has any academic qualifications, so this book would be highly suspect to anyone looking to spend money on it. I recommend that anyone considering doing so does some background research of their own. I'm not saying don't buy it as it might be just what you're looking for, I'm saying do your research first and make an educated decision.
Not my thread but I did read it.
Its the financial fundamentals algorithm that correctly predicts why the last 3 btc value bubbles were the values it hit.
The same financial fundamental algorithm predicts the next three value bubbles up to only a 10% population acceptance.
So its a financial algorithm to predict btc value on solid financial fundamentals such as GWP and user base as a ratio of world population.
It explains expected peaks and valleys in the value and real financial fundamentals for support floors of value.
I know the author, Im not him nor the OP and I know both author and OP.
No encryption algorithm, its a financial value algorithm using solid financial fundamentals.
I'm glad to see you've mentioned your connection to the book here. I'm not looking for an argument here, I'm pointing out to everyone else that the above is definitely not an unbiased view or review, it's marketing from the person/people shilling this. You all seem to be essentially another alt account for the same 'adoni' network that is shilling this book, the same network which incorporates all those 1-brand websites that are just full of garbage PPC marketing keyword content in a terrible wordpress layout. The same network that claims to headed by a 'Dr Sol Adoni' who proudly claims to have a 'wall full' of doctorates, yet will not disclose any genuine information other than a bunch of web links sharing the same suspiciously bad range of spamdexing content and designs.
Last time you were advertising this book for sale you were very misleadingly called it a "signed copy of the bitcoin algorithm" which was obviously nonsense.
I'm sure we'd all like more information on the genuine credentials of the author if you'd like to share, it might give us all enough information to decide if the book is worth buying. What genuinely earned, accredited, academic qualifications does 'Dr' Sol Adoni have?
Specifically. I know from the other titles you're claiming to publish by him he's a regular modern day renaissance-man who's an expert physcician,
astrologian, physician, dietician and golfer etc. And now an expert in economics and bitcoin.
Btw, '
honorary doctorates' don't count and don't allow for the use of 'Dr' as a title. Plus, that's an insult to everyone who actually genuinely earnt a Ph.D. "
An honorary degree is not recognized as having the same stature as a corresponding earned doctorate degree and should not be represented as such."Please don't just paste another bunch of spamtastic urls, I can see enough of your collection on nameserver reverse lookups
like this, along with the relevant and equally vague 'adoni' registrant details. If you're running full disclosure, we'd be very interested in where and under what full name your main/parent legal entity is registered so we can review the public filings?
One last, straight up, question: Could you confirm if 'Dr' Sol Adoni' also happens to be the same person as acclaimed loon
Sollog and the same person otherwise known as
John Patrick Ennis, would he? I think I have just realised the answer to this, and I think it explains a lot of the recent erratic behaviour of this group of alt accounts.
Further reading: [
1], [
2], [
3], [
4], [
5]
